법학 후속세대 양성에 대한 소고 = A Study on the Development of Subsequent Generations in Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The question of “how to cultivate the next generation of academics” is also a question that calls for revisiting the present of “law” in which we are currently involved, and for contemplating and awakening to its direction. Therefore, in this article, three questions - (1) WHAT: What (what law) will be passed on? (2) WHO: Who is the next generation of academics? (3) HOW: How to train?I'd like to throw a - and try to find an answer to that.
First of all, regarding the question [WHAT], I wanted to reflect on the mission and role of law in discovering and producing “the law that should be” rather than “the law that exists” through the long debate over the academic nature of law and Kirchmann's skeptical criticism, and through this, I wanted to look back at law (education), especially case law education and research, which is being discussed in the current law school system.
On the other hand, for the effectiveness of the training policy for the next generation of academics, it was proposed to limit the next generation of academics to those who have obtained doctoral courses and degrees in law schools, and reorganize the general school of law into a "training route or dedicated institution for the next generation of academics.
Regarding the last question (HOW), it was also emphasized that it is necessary to prepare a system for training the next generation of academics at the national level through a more sustainable and systematic approach at the policy and organizational level, not a one-time research fund (monetary) support or temporary training system in the form of a project group to ensure a certain size and quality of training for the next generation of academics.
As an alternative to this, it proposed a plan to provide stable status and financial support for “researchers” rather than “part-time instructors” to subsequent generations by establishing and operating specialized research institutes for each academic field under the current National Research Foundation, such as Germany's MPG (Max-Plankk-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 남기윤, "사비니의 법학 방법론 - 한국 사법학의 신과제 설정을 위한 법학 방법론 연구(8-2) -" 한국법학원 (126) : 5-62, 2011

2 심헌섭, "법학의 학문성-도전과 응답의 자취-" 23 (23): 1982

3 김영환, "법도그마틱의 개념과 그 실천적 기능" 13 : 1994

4 김성룡, "법 이론과 실무에 던지는 물음, ‘법학의 학문성’ -법학의 학문성에 관한 논의가 우리에게 던지는 과제" 한국형사소송법학회 7 (7): 1-31, 2015

5 공영호, "미국 로스쿨 교수의 양성 방식 및 로스쿨 로리뷰에 관한 쟁점-한국의 법학 학문후속세대 양성에 시사점-" 법학연구소 29 (29): 165-192, 2018

6 천경훈, "로스쿨 도입 이후 일본의 학문후속세대 양성 –서울대와 도쿄대․교토대의 비교-" 56 (56): 2015

7 Knütel, Rolf, "로마법 산책" 法文社 2008

8 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학" 을유문화사 2001

9 남기윤, "근대 자연법론과 판덱텐의 현대적 慣用 시대의 법학방법론(1600～1800) － 한국 사법학의 신과제 설정을 위한 법학방법론 연구(7) －" 안암법학회 (34) : 1-70, 2011