RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공정거래위원회에 의한 사전심사청구제도의 현황 및 개선방안 = A Legal Research on the Business Review Scheme by the Korean Fair Trade Commission

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101615012

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since the scheme of Business Review run by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) was introduced in 2004 in Korea, it has received wide attention from many aspects of the korean society. Besides of the KFTC, the U.S. DOJ(Antitrust Division) and the japanese FTC has already managed similar scheme for the purpose of proliferating law-abiding culture among business sectors and letting firms avoid infringement of law in advance.
    But the number of application of business review has been rapidly decreasing year by year. Although the reason is not clear, it is time to make concentrated analysis on the scheme is certain at least. Furthermore, fundamental course on which the KFTC should take is needed to be decided, between activating and abolishing it.
    Upon this circumstance, this paper attempts to examine current status of the business review scheme by the KFTC in Korea, and find out main causes of decline in usage of the scheme. After making a empirical and systematic analysis on the U.S. and japanese legislations, it presents legal issues regarding on the business review and suggests some idea for improvement of the scheme, instead of a conclusion.
    번역하기

    Since the scheme of Business Review run by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) was introduced in 2004 in Korea, it has received wide attention from many aspects of the korean society. Besides of the KFTC, the U.S. DOJ(Antitrust Division) and the ja...

    Since the scheme of Business Review run by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) was introduced in 2004 in Korea, it has received wide attention from many aspects of the korean society. Besides of the KFTC, the U.S. DOJ(Antitrust Division) and the japanese FTC has already managed similar scheme for the purpose of proliferating law-abiding culture among business sectors and letting firms avoid infringement of law in advance.
    But the number of application of business review has been rapidly decreasing year by year. Although the reason is not clear, it is time to make concentrated analysis on the scheme is certain at least. Furthermore, fundamental course on which the KFTC should take is needed to be decided, between activating and abolishing it.
    Upon this circumstance, this paper attempts to examine current status of the business review scheme by the KFTC in Korea, and find out main causes of decline in usage of the scheme. After making a empirical and systematic analysis on the U.S. and japanese legislations, it presents legal issues regarding on the business review and suggests some idea for improvement of the scheme, instead of a conclusion.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박균성, "행정법강의" 博英社 2010

    2 공정거래위원회, "사전심사청구업무매뉴얼"

    3 한국공정경쟁연합회, "사전심사청구 주요사례" 144-151, 2007

    4 공정거래위원회, "공정위 법률자문서비스(사전심사청구제), 기업들 반응 좋아"

    5 공정거래위원회, "공정거래 자율준수프로그램(CP)도입현황과 운영실태"

    6 久保陽子, "米國による內部統制ルールの見直し" (15) : 2007

    7 高山奎奈子, "ノーアクション․レターに對する信賴と民․刑事責任(1)" (720) : 2001

    8 M. Porter, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" Macmillan 1990

    9 Office of Fair Trading, "The Cartel Offence Guidance on the issue of no action letters for individuals"

    10 Kirk S. Jordan, "Compliance Programs,In What the Government Really Wants" 2 : 2003

    1 박균성, "행정법강의" 博英社 2010

    2 공정거래위원회, "사전심사청구업무매뉴얼"

    3 한국공정경쟁연합회, "사전심사청구 주요사례" 144-151, 2007

    4 공정거래위원회, "공정위 법률자문서비스(사전심사청구제), 기업들 반응 좋아"

    5 공정거래위원회, "공정거래 자율준수프로그램(CP)도입현황과 운영실태"

    6 久保陽子, "米國による內部統制ルールの見直し" (15) : 2007

    7 高山奎奈子, "ノーアクション․レターに對する信賴と民․刑事責任(1)" (720) : 2001

    8 M. Porter, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" Macmillan 1990

    9 Office of Fair Trading, "The Cartel Offence Guidance on the issue of no action letters for individuals"

    10 Kirk S. Jordan, "Compliance Programs,In What the Government Really Wants" 2 : 2003

    11 Julian O. von Kalinowski, "Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation" LexisNexis 2003

    12 William J. Kolasky, "Antitrust Compliance Programs:The Government Perspective" US DOJ 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.74 0.74 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.53 0.667 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼