RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    성행동 상황에서 여성의 거절 이유 평가의 성차 = Gender Difference in the Evaluated Reason Why Women Refused in Sexual Behavior Situations

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103718109

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There is a common belief that women's refusal in sexual behavior situations is not a true one. In this respect, this study aims to identify why women refuse to accept men's proposal to sexual interaction in sexual behavior situations and whether there is a difference in evaluated reason why women refuse such a proposal between men and women. Sexual behavior scenarios were presented to 152 male and female college students and asked to describe the reason why women refused as freely as they wanted. Based on this, questionable items on why women refused were organized and then sexual behavior situational scenarios were presented to 536 male and female college students and asked to evaluate the importance of the reason of women's refusal. As a result of factor analysis, the reason why women refused men's proposal could be classified into six sub-factors: ‘sense of chastity,’ ‘gender role norm,’ ‘manipulation,’ ‘relational changes,’ ‘lack of communion,’ and ‘practical issues.’ Female participants evaluated that the woman in a scenario refused man's sexual proposal for ‘sense of chastity,’ ‘relational changes,’ and ‘practical issue’ reasons more than male participants. On the other hand, male participants evaluated that the woman in the scenario refused man's sexual proposal for ‘gender role norm’ and ‘manipulation’ reasons more than female participants. Such a result was discussed with difference in sexual communication between men and women.
    번역하기

    There is a common belief that women's refusal in sexual behavior situations is not a true one. In this respect, this study aims to identify why women refuse to accept men's proposal to sexual interaction in sexual behavior situations and whether there...

    There is a common belief that women's refusal in sexual behavior situations is not a true one. In this respect, this study aims to identify why women refuse to accept men's proposal to sexual interaction in sexual behavior situations and whether there is a difference in evaluated reason why women refuse such a proposal between men and women. Sexual behavior scenarios were presented to 152 male and female college students and asked to describe the reason why women refused as freely as they wanted. Based on this, questionable items on why women refused were organized and then sexual behavior situational scenarios were presented to 536 male and female college students and asked to evaluate the importance of the reason of women's refusal. As a result of factor analysis, the reason why women refused men's proposal could be classified into six sub-factors: ‘sense of chastity,’ ‘gender role norm,’ ‘manipulation,’ ‘relational changes,’ ‘lack of communion,’ and ‘practical issues.’ Female participants evaluated that the woman in a scenario refused man's sexual proposal for ‘sense of chastity,’ ‘relational changes,’ and ‘practical issue’ reasons more than male participants. On the other hand, male participants evaluated that the woman in the scenario refused man's sexual proposal for ‘gender role norm’ and ‘manipulation’ reasons more than female participants. Such a result was discussed with difference in sexual communication between men and women.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안귀여루, "이성교제 폭력행동과 관련된 개인적 변인들에 관한 연구" 한국가족사회복지학회 (9) : 56-75, 2002

    2 전중환, "욕망의 진화" 사이언스북스 2007

    3 박혜경, "여성학 : 페미니즘 시각에서 본 또 다른 세상" 미래 M&B 2007

    4 윤병해, "양가적 성차별 태도에 따른 성폭력 피해자에 대한 비난 차이: 강간통념의 매개효과" 한국여성심리학회 11 (11): 1-19, 2006

    5 김정인, "성희롱문제 지각에서 성차 및 성역할태도의 영향" 6 : 1-22, 2001

    6 윤가현, "성문화외 심리" 학지사 2006

    7 교육부, "성교육 표준 강의안"

    8 류승아, "생애 주기에 따른 성과 심리" 학지사 2015

    9 한국여성민우회 성폭력상담소, "데이트, 짜릿함과 난감한 사이"

    10 이지연, "대학생의 데이트 성폭력 피해와 가해에 대한 설명모형" 한국상담심리학회 17 (17): 419-436, 2005

    1 안귀여루, "이성교제 폭력행동과 관련된 개인적 변인들에 관한 연구" 한국가족사회복지학회 (9) : 56-75, 2002

    2 전중환, "욕망의 진화" 사이언스북스 2007

    3 박혜경, "여성학 : 페미니즘 시각에서 본 또 다른 세상" 미래 M&B 2007

    4 윤병해, "양가적 성차별 태도에 따른 성폭력 피해자에 대한 비난 차이: 강간통념의 매개효과" 한국여성심리학회 11 (11): 1-19, 2006

    5 김정인, "성희롱문제 지각에서 성차 및 성역할태도의 영향" 6 : 1-22, 2001

    6 윤가현, "성문화외 심리" 학지사 2006

    7 교육부, "성교육 표준 강의안"

    8 류승아, "생애 주기에 따른 성과 심리" 학지사 2015

    9 한국여성민우회 성폭력상담소, "데이트, 짜릿함과 난감한 사이"

    10 이지연, "대학생의 데이트 성폭력 피해와 가해에 대한 설명모형" 한국상담심리학회 17 (17): 419-436, 2005

    11 장휘숙, "대학생 이성교제폭력의 실태와 위험요인들" 8 : 179-204, 2001

    12 신경림, "대학생 성태도 실태조사" 한국건강증진개발원 2011

    13 김정애, "국내 대학생들의 성경험 실태 및 성경험 예측 요인 분석" 사단법인 대한보건협회 40 (40): 71-80, 2014

    14 이석재, "강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증" 2 : 131-148, 1999

    15 이석재, "강간통념 수용도에 따른 성행동, 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각" 15 : 97-116, 2001

    16 김은경, "가정폭력 목격이 자녀의 데이트 성폭력에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 성역할태도의 매개효과" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 759-777, 2010

    17 Walker, S. J., "When"no"becomes"yes" : Why girls and women consent to unwanted sex" 6 : 157-166, 1997

    18 Sprecher, S., "Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse : College student's dating experiences in three countries" 31 : 125-132, 1994

    19 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Token resistance to sex : New perspectives on an old stereotype" 22 : 443-463, 1998

    20 Kreager, D., "The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance" 72 : 143-164, 2009

    21 Van Wie, V. E., "The role of woman’s explanations for refusal on men’s ability to discriminate unwanted sexual behavior in a date rape scenario" 16 : 331-334, 2001

    22 Woo, J. S. T., "The role of sex guilt in the relationship between culture and women’s sexual desire" 40 : 385-394, 2011

    23 Buss, D. M., "Social Psychology and human sexuality" Sheridan Books 57-94, 2001

    24 Malamuth, N. M., "Sexual arousal to rape depictions : Individual differences" 89 : 763-766, 1980

    25 Abraham, M., "Sexual abuse in South Asian immigrant marriages" 5 : 591-618, 1999

    26 Check, J. V., "Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape" 45 : 344-356, 1983

    27 DeSouza, E. R., "Reactions to refusals of sexual advances among U. S. and Brazilian men and women" 34 : 549-564, 1996

    28 Lonsway, K. A., "Rape myths : In review" 18 : 133-164, 1994

    29 Lee, J., "Rape myth acceptance among Korean college students : The roles of gender, attitudes toward women, and sexual double standard" 25 : 1200-1223, 2010

    30 Osman, S., "Predicting men’s perceptions of date rape using the heuristic-systematic model" 22 : 25-32, 1997

    31 Osman, S. L., "Predicting men's rape perceptions based on the belief that"no"really means, "yes"" 33 : 683-692, 2003

    32 Garcia, L. T., "Perceptions of resistance to unwanted sexual advances" 10 : 43-52, 1998

    33 Gunter, B., "Medial sex : What are the issue?" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002

    34 Choi, S., "Late adolescents’ perception of their peers who report a large number of sex partners" 4 : 1-4, 2015

    35 Oliver, M., "Gender differences in sexuality : A meta-analysis" 114 : 29-51, 1993

    36 Taris, T., "Gender as a moderator of the effects of the love motive and relational context on sexual experience" 26 : 159-180, 1997

    37 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Examining stereotypes about token resistance to sex" 35 : 676-683, 2011

    38 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Doble standard/double bind : The sexual double standard and women's communication about sex" 15 : 447-461, 1991

    39 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates women's token resistance to sex" 5 : 872-879, 1988

    40 O’Sullivan, L. F., "Disassembling a stereotype : Gender differences in the use of token resistance" 24 : 1035-1055, 1994

    41 Kalin, R., "Development and validation of a sex role ideology scale" 42 : 731-738, 1978

    42 Fischer, G., "Deceptive, verbally coercive college males : Attitudinal predictors and lies told" 25 : 527-533, 1996

    43 Knox, D., "Dating behaviors of university students" 30 : 255-258, 1981

    44 Kanin, E. J., "Date rape : Unofficial criminals and victims" 9 : 95-108, 1984

    45 Marx, B. P., "Date rape : An analysis of two contextual variables" 19 : 45-463, 1995

    46 Burt, M. R., "Cultural myths and supports of rape" 38 : 217-230, 1980

    47 Osman, S., "Belief in token resistance and type of resistance as predictors of men’s perceptions of date rape" 24 : 189-196, 1999

    48 Lonsway, K. A., "Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance : A theoretical and empirical reexamination" 68 : 704-711, 1995

    49 Krahé, B., "Ambiguous communication of sexual intentions as a risk marker of sexual aggression" 42 : 313-337, 2000

    50 Abbey, A., "Alcohol's effects on sexual perception" 61 : 688-697, 2000

    51 Abbey, A., "Alcohol's effects on perceptions of a potential date rape" 64 : 669-677, 2003

    52 Van Wie, V. E., "A replication of a contextual analysis of date rape" 1 : 351-365, 1995

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.59 1.59 1.81
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.73 1.74 2.599 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼