도청된 자료의 보도와 언론의 책임에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of the study is to balance freedom of the press with the privacy of wire communication and to analyze other legal issues involved in the media publication of illegally intercepted materials.
If the media did not engage in the illegal interception, but lawfully obtained the tapes from the unknown person or persons, the media should not be responsible for the infringement of the privacy of wire communications. Without overriding importance, debates on a matter of public concern should be wide-open, robust and uninhibited. Imposing sanction on the media would not deter unknown persons from illegally intercepting private communications. The person who engages in the illegal interception must be responsible for such activities rather than the media that merely receive and broadcast the content of the intercepted communications. In other words, the application of the wiretap statute to an innocent disclosure of public information is plainly insufficient to justify the violation of the constitutional guarantee for the freedom of the press. The sanction will not only chill the freedom of the press but also result in self-regulation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 선 호, "현직기자 직무상 취재행위 조사 자체가 이례적" 2005

2 우병동, "한국 언론의 탐사 보도 연구" 18 (18): 213-242, 1997

3 유일상, "취재보도 특권의 윤리 법제적 허용범위에 관한 연구:TV보도를 중심으로" (49) : 158-190, 1999

4 김창룡, "취재관행과 법윤리상의 일고찰" 15 (15): 24-35, 1995

5 "최초 투고일 2005년 12월 16일"

6 박춘식, "최근 국내 언론을 통해 본 도청 실태" 6 (6): 87-92, 1996

7 김창룡, "이상호 기자 소환, 언론자유 위축시켜" 2005.8

8 유한호, "의혹 폭로 중계보도의 문제점" 120-125, 2001

9 이창근, "은폐적 취재행위의 위법성과 헌법적 구제에 대하여" 11 : 77-116, 1998

10 이재경, "위장취재와 몰래카메라 취재보도의 윤리적 문제" 17 (17): 27-37, 1997

11 이용성, "위법적 취재관행과 탐사저널리즘" 60-65, 2002

12 김재협, "위법적 취재 관행과 법적 환경" 19 (19): 62-79, 1999

13 이승선, "언론인 저작물에 나타난 취재행위의 형사법적 위법 가능성에 관한 연구" 46 (46): 344-387, 2001

14 나세영, "사진과 녹음테이프의 증거능력에 관한 고찰:과학수사의 효용성을 중심으로" 2003

15 권혜선, "불법 자료 보도라도 국민 알권리 우선" 2005

16 김경호, "몰래카메라를 이용한 취재와 인격권의 침해에 관한 연구:한국과 미국의 사례 비교를 통한 상충된 법익의 균형" 47 (47): 246-273, 2003

17 김형준, "도청의 형사법상 법리" 14 (14): 277-300, 1989

18 권영설, "도청의 헌법상 문제" 305 : 29-36, 1982

19 방정환, "도청의 법적 규제에 관한 고찰" 2001

20 원혜욱, "도청감청 및 비밀녹음(녹화)의 제한과 증거사용" 한국형사정책연구원 2000

21 김동훈, "도청, 감청에 관한 형사법적 규제" 2002

22 유의선, "도,감청에 대한 법적 소고: 이익형량 추정에 따른 법적 대응방안을 중심으로" (3) : 261-288, 1999

23 황성기, "경찰공무수행시 동행취재와 프라이버시와의 관계" 50-57, 2001

24 "게재 확정일 2006년 1월 21일"

25 Bast, C. M, "What’s bugging you? Inconsistencies and irrationalities of the law of eavesdropping" 47 : 837-914, 1998

26 Garrie, D. B, "Voice over Internet protocol and the wiretap act: Is your conversation protected?" 29 : 97-138, 2005

27 LeBel, P. A, "Undercover newsgathering techniques: Issues and concerns: The constitutional interest in getting the news: Toward a First Amendment protection from tort liability for surreptitious newsgathering" 4 : 1145-1163, 1996

28 Baron, S. S, "Tortious interference: The limits of common law liability for newsgathering" 4 : 1027-1068, 1996

29 Warren,S.D, "The right to privacy" 4 : 193-220, 1890

30 Whitlow, M.A, "The electronic communications privacy act protects individual privacy but not at the expense of the media’s free press right" 27 : 339-361, 2002

31 Greenwald, M, "The big chill:Investigative reporting in the current media environment" Iowa State University Press 2000

32 Tison, E, "Straddling the fence: Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Bartnicki v. Vopper gives protection of privacy and still manges to protect the press: 532 U.S. 514 (2001)" 27 : 661-686, 2003

33 Halstuk, M.E, "Shielding private lives from prying eyes:The escalating conflict between constitutional privacy and the accountability principle of democracy" 1 : 71-96, 2003

34 Mudd, J. A, "Right to privacy v. freedom of speech: A review and analysis of Bartnicki v. Vopper" 41 : 179-197, 2002

35 Fuson, J.H, "Protecting the press from privacy" 148 : 629-671, 1999

36 Dienes, C.T, "Protecting investigative journalism" 67 : 1139-1151, 1999

37 Smolla, R.A, "Privacy and the First Amendment right to gather news" 67 : 1097-1138, 1999

38 Prosser,W.L, "Privacy" 48 : 383-423, 1960

39 "Peavy v. WFAA-TV, Inc., 221 F.3d 158" 2000

40 "Peavy v. New Times, Inc., 976 F.Supp. 532" 1997

41 Walsh, J. J, "Media misbehavior and the wages of sin: The constitutionality of consequential damages for publication of ill-gotten information" 4 : 1111-1144, 1996

42 Kim, G. H, "Media liability for surreptitious and other intrusive newsgathering practices" Southern Illinois University 2001

43 "McDermott v. Boehner, 532 U.S. 1050" 2001

44 "Keller v. Aymond, 722 So.2d 1224" 1998

45 Hodges, "Journal of Mass Media Ethics" 1988

46 Wilkinson, T, "Is anyone listening to me?: Bartnicki v. Vopper" 63 : 589-607, 2003

47 Raymond, "Intrusion by news-gathering entity as invasion of right of privacy" 1989

48 Goger,T.J, "First Amendment as immunizing newsman from liability for tortious conduct while gathering news" 28 : 904-910, 1976

49 Swarthout, A.M, "Eavesdropping as violating right of privacy" 11 : 1296-1306, 2001

50 Patterson, M. D, "Constitutional law: The intersection of title III and the First Amendment: A diminishing right to privacy in an expanding technological age" 54 : 543-566, 2002

51 Patterson, "Case studies in investigative reporting" Columbia University Press 1986

52 Bond, K. M, "Bartnicki v. Vopper: It’s a matter of public concern! Exposing the myth of electronic privacy and protecting the press" 31 : 597-626, 2003

53 Paradis, D. P, "Bartnicki v. Vopper: Cell phones and throwing stones" 37 : 1117-1155, 2003

54 Hunt, J. N, "Bartnicki v. Vopper: Another media victory or ominous warning of potential change in Supreme Court First Amendment jurisprudence?" 30 : 367-402, 2003

55 "Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514" 2001

56 Easton, E. B, "Balancing proprietary interests and the right to know" 21 : 139-193, 2003

57 Zirkle, L. E, "A public concern exception for the press and its disclosure of unlawfully obtained information" 11 : 441-461, 2002

58 서울고등법원, "99나43440" 서울고등법원 2000.3

59 서울지방법원, "99가합64112" 서울지방법원 2000.2

60 서울지방법원, "99가합34685" 서울지방법원 2000.3

61 대법원, "98도2188" 대법원 2000.2

62 서울지방법원, "98가합51935" 서울지방법원 1999.7

63 서울지방법원, "98가합107982" 서울지방법원 2001.8

64 대법원, "97다10215/97다10222 병합" 대법원 1999.1

65 서울지방법원 남부지원, "97가합8022" 서울지방법원 남부지원 1997.8

66 대법원, "96다17257" 대법원 1998.7

67 대법원, "96다11327" 대법원 1998.9

68 대법원, "2004도3912" 대법원 2004.10

69 대법원, "2003도3000" 대법원 2003.9

70 황호출, "2002년 언론상 어떤 작품들이 수상했나 : 게이트 기사가 압도적, 탐사보도 증가" (385) : 70-74, 2003

71 서울고등법원, "2000나25745" 서울고등법원 2001.7