RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Efficient Net- B0 baseline for three class Alzheimer MRI with imbalance remedies

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110095993

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Class imbalance in structural MRI can bias Alzheimer disease classifiers toward majority categories and raise the risk of clinically costly false negatives. We compare two simple and widely used remedies within the same EfficientNet-B0 transfer learning pipeline for three class slice level classification of AD, CN, and MCI. Method A uses balanced sampling each epoch with standard cross entropy. Method B uses natural sampling with class weighted cross entropy. With identical preprocessing, augmentations, label smoothing 0.05, the AdamW optimizer, and a two-phase schedule with 8 epochs of warm up followed by 10 epochs of fine tuning, we evaluate on a stratified 15% validation split that reflects natural prevalence with AD 18,440 slices, CN 26,892, and MCI 42,744. Method B attains accuracy 0.9938, macro F1 0.9938, and AD recall 0.9946, exceeding Method A with 0.9839, 0.9829, and 0.9646. AD false negatives decreased from 98% of method A to 15% of method B. The gain arises from exposure to all unique training samples each epoch and from an objective that matches the unbalanced validation distribution by reweighting errors without altering batch priors. These results support class weighted loss as a strong and architecture agnostic baseline for imbalanced AD MRI and agree with prior evidence that weighting can outperform synthetic oversampling on related Alzheimer datasets.
      번역하기

      Class imbalance in structural MRI can bias Alzheimer disease classifiers toward majority categories and raise the risk of clinically costly false negatives. We compare two simple and widely used remedies within the same EfficientNet-B0 transfer learni...

      Class imbalance in structural MRI can bias Alzheimer disease classifiers toward majority categories and raise the risk of clinically costly false negatives. We compare two simple and widely used remedies within the same EfficientNet-B0 transfer learning pipeline for three class slice level classification of AD, CN, and MCI. Method A uses balanced sampling each epoch with standard cross entropy. Method B uses natural sampling with class weighted cross entropy. With identical preprocessing, augmentations, label smoothing 0.05, the AdamW optimizer, and a two-phase schedule with 8 epochs of warm up followed by 10 epochs of fine tuning, we evaluate on a stratified 15% validation split that reflects natural prevalence with AD 18,440 slices, CN 26,892, and MCI 42,744. Method B attains accuracy 0.9938, macro F1 0.9938, and AD recall 0.9946, exceeding Method A with 0.9839, 0.9829, and 0.9646. AD false negatives decreased from 98% of method A to 15% of method B. The gain arises from exposure to all unique training samples each epoch and from an objective that matches the unbalanced validation distribution by reweighting errors without altering batch priors. These results support class weighted loss as a strong and architecture agnostic baseline for imbalanced AD MRI and agree with prior evidence that weighting can outperform synthetic oversampling on related Alzheimer datasets.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼