RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    엔터테인먼트법에 대한 새로운 접근 - 주체 측면에서의 이해 - = New approach to Entertainment Law - Understanding from the Perspective of its Subjects -

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Human beings, one of whose characteristics is “Homo Ludens, Man the Player", continue to seek amusements. As “play" or “amusement" becomes commodity and goods, related industry develops and many complicated legal problems arise therefrom.
    The purpose of this article is to review the relatively short history of development of entertainment law and to attempt a new approach to it, which will lead to clear understanding of the law.
    The established approaches have been roughly divided into those focused on entertainment industry and those focused on applicable legal issues. This article approached entertainment law in terms of legal relations among interested parties in the entertainment market, which are celebrities, the public and entertainment industry, which relations have been changing since the outset of entertainment law. The benefit of this approach is to understand the law much better through the historical review of the legal relations formed in the past as well, and to contribute to efficient resolution of entertainment disputes through delineating their scope and boundary.
    For this purpose, above all, in the review of objects regulated by the entertainment law, this article covered two existing trends of approach to entertainment law and proposed a new approach that entertainment law is about legal relations among the interested parties in the entertainment market. The new paradigm is supported by historical review of the entertainment law. Finally I reviewed the characteristics of entertainment disputes, which would prove ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) the best legal dispute resolution in the field of entertainment law.
    Despite of great demand of entertainment law among practitioners, no sufficient academic discussion of entertainment law has been made by scholars. It is submitted that it is enough to give rise to a chance of discussion of entertainment law and disputes through this article.
    번역하기

    Human beings, one of whose characteristics is “Homo Ludens, Man the Player", continue to seek amusements. As “play" or “amusement" becomes commodity and goods, related industry develops and many complicated legal problems arise therefrom. The p...

    Human beings, one of whose characteristics is “Homo Ludens, Man the Player", continue to seek amusements. As “play" or “amusement" becomes commodity and goods, related industry develops and many complicated legal problems arise therefrom.
    The purpose of this article is to review the relatively short history of development of entertainment law and to attempt a new approach to it, which will lead to clear understanding of the law.
    The established approaches have been roughly divided into those focused on entertainment industry and those focused on applicable legal issues. This article approached entertainment law in terms of legal relations among interested parties in the entertainment market, which are celebrities, the public and entertainment industry, which relations have been changing since the outset of entertainment law. The benefit of this approach is to understand the law much better through the historical review of the legal relations formed in the past as well, and to contribute to efficient resolution of entertainment disputes through delineating their scope and boundary.
    For this purpose, above all, in the review of objects regulated by the entertainment law, this article covered two existing trends of approach to entertainment law and proposed a new approach that entertainment law is about legal relations among the interested parties in the entertainment market. The new paradigm is supported by historical review of the entertainment law. Finally I reviewed the characteristics of entertainment disputes, which would prove ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) the best legal dispute resolution in the field of entertainment law.
    Despite of great demand of entertainment law among practitioners, no sufficient academic discussion of entertainment law has been made by scholars. It is submitted that it is enough to give rise to a chance of discussion of entertainment law and disputes through this article.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "호모 루덴스" 까치 2005

    2 "퍼블리시티권을 아십니까? 도둑맞는 한류에 대한 보호대책" 2005

    3 "엔터테인먼트 비즈니스 분쟁사례집" 청림출판 2004

    4 "문화산업 전문인력 형성구조와 정책지원" 한국노동연구원 2006

    1 "호모 루덴스" 까치 2005

    2 "퍼블리시티권을 아십니까? 도둑맞는 한류에 대한 보호대책" 2005

    3 "엔터테인먼트 비즈니스 분쟁사례집" 청림출판 2004

    4 "문화산업 전문인력 형성구조와 정책지원" 한국노동연구원 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2014-01-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Civil Law KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.42 1.42 1.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 1.08 1.392 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼