RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영미법상 계약교섭의 결렬에 따른 책임 = Precontractual Liability in Anglo-American Contract Law

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In modern society many contracts require long-term negotiations. Consequently the disputes between pre-contractual parties arising out of the failure of negotiations occur more increasingly. And the resolution of these disputes has assumed increasing importance. However common-law and civil-law systems have arrived at different solutions.
    According to the civil-law tradition, especially according to German legal theory, many Korean legal scholars have advocated to adapt the concept of ‘culpa in contrahendo' (fault in contracting) developed by Rudolf von Jhering and now codified in §311 II BGB to resolve these disputes. However Korean courts have applied the rule of torts with regards to this kind of cases.
    This article introduced the precontractual liability in Anglo-American Contract Law as an reference for further discussion in Korean legal theory. Above all, this article followed the theory of Farnsworth, the most famous American scholar in contract law. According to his theory, the possible grounds for the precontractual liability can be grouped under four headings: (1) unjust enrichment resulting from the negotiations; (2) a misrepresentation made during the negotiations; (3) a specific promise made during the negotiations (promissory estoppel); (4) an agreement to negotiate in good faith. This article concluded that this type of approach to the precontractual liability is available for the further development of theory in Korean legal system as well as in Anglo-American legal system.
    번역하기

    In modern society many contracts require long-term negotiations. Consequently the disputes between pre-contractual parties arising out of the failure of negotiations occur more increasingly. And the resolution of these disputes has assumed increasing ...

    In modern society many contracts require long-term negotiations. Consequently the disputes between pre-contractual parties arising out of the failure of negotiations occur more increasingly. And the resolution of these disputes has assumed increasing importance. However common-law and civil-law systems have arrived at different solutions.
    According to the civil-law tradition, especially according to German legal theory, many Korean legal scholars have advocated to adapt the concept of ‘culpa in contrahendo' (fault in contracting) developed by Rudolf von Jhering and now codified in §311 II BGB to resolve these disputes. However Korean courts have applied the rule of torts with regards to this kind of cases.
    This article introduced the precontractual liability in Anglo-American Contract Law as an reference for further discussion in Korean legal theory. Above all, this article followed the theory of Farnsworth, the most famous American scholar in contract law. According to his theory, the possible grounds for the precontractual liability can be grouped under four headings: (1) unjust enrichment resulting from the negotiations; (2) a misrepresentation made during the negotiations; (3) a specific promise made during the negotiations (promissory estoppel); (4) an agreement to negotiate in good faith. This article concluded that this type of approach to the precontractual liability is available for the further development of theory in Korean legal system as well as in Anglo-American legal system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "미국계약법입문" 2004

    2 "미국 계약법상 Good Faith 원칙" 44 (44): 40-, 2003.12

    3 "계약체결전단계의 법규범화" 10집 : 93-, 2001.8

    4 "계약의향서(Letter of Intent)에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 50-, 1998.3

    5 "계약의 합의로 인한 구속력과 계약협상의 부당파기의 한계" (25) : 167-, 2004.3

    6 "계약의 성립에 관한 입법론적 연구" 49 (49): 182-, 2000.8

    7 "계약교섭이 부당하게 파기된 경우의 법률관계" 25집 : 159-, 2003.2

    8 "계약교섭의 부당파기로 인한 책임" 27집 : 233-, 2005.2

    9 "계약교섭과 교섭자의 책임’에 대한 미국법상의 논의" 12집 : 53-, 2002.8

    10 "The Law of Contract" 1999

    1 "미국계약법입문" 2004

    2 "미국 계약법상 Good Faith 원칙" 44 (44): 40-, 2003.12

    3 "계약체결전단계의 법규범화" 10집 : 93-, 2001.8

    4 "계약의향서(Letter of Intent)에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 50-, 1998.3

    5 "계약의 합의로 인한 구속력과 계약협상의 부당파기의 한계" (25) : 167-, 2004.3

    6 "계약의 성립에 관한 입법론적 연구" 49 (49): 182-, 2000.8

    7 "계약교섭이 부당하게 파기된 경우의 법률관계" 25집 : 159-, 2003.2

    8 "계약교섭의 부당파기로 인한 책임" 27집 : 233-, 2005.2

    9 "계약교섭과 교섭자의 책임’에 대한 미국법상의 논의" 12집 : 53-, 2002.8

    10 "The Law of Contract" 1999

    11 "Textbook on Contract Law" Oxford 2004

    12 "Restatement of the Law of Restitution" 1983

    13 "Restatement of the Law of Contracts" 1981

    14 "Restatement of the Law of Contracts" 1932

    15 "Misrepresentation" Sweet & Maxwell 2002

    16 "Haftung fr in Aussicht gestellten Vertragsabschluß" 390-192, 1992

    17 "Die culpa in contrahendo in den UNDROIT-Prizipien und den Prinzipien des Europischen Vertragsrechts aus der Sicht des deutschen Brgerlichen Rechts" 2000

    18 "Der Schutz des Vertrauens bei Vertragsverhandlungen in der neueren Amerikanischen Rechtsprechung" 873-, 1978

    19 "Contractual Good Faith" 1995

    20 "Contracts" 1999

    21 "Comparative Contract Law" The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 2006

    22 "Chitty on Contracts" 1 : 2004

    23 "An Introduction to the Law of Contract" 1995

    24 "'Good Faith' in General Contract Law and the Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code" 1968

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2014-01-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Civil Law KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.42 1.42 1.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 1.08 1.392 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼