RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    LULUCF 온실가스 인벤토리 산정에서의 국제 기술전문가 검토 쟁점 분석 및 국내 시사점 = Analysis of technical expert review issues in LULUCF greenhouse gas inventories and their implications for South Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110404146

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Paris Agreement establishes the principles of Transparency, Accuracy, Consistency, Comparability, and Completeness (TACCC) under the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), strengthening the Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system beyond the approach used under the Kyoto Protocol. TACCC principles serve as criteria in the Technical Expert Review (TER), which assesses each country’s implementation and progress by reviewing Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs) and National Inventory Documents (NIDs). Among inventory sectors, Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), which accounts for approximately 6 17% of total CO2 emissions, plays an important role as both a carbon sink and a land-based resource. Therefore, examining TER findings with a focus on the LULUCF sector is essential. However, previous studies have generally examined transparency systems and inventory estimation separately, with limited application of TACCC principles to TER findings. This study analyzes TER issues in relation to Tier levels within the LULUCF sector.
    Annex I Parties that submitted TER reports and addenda were selected for analysis. The study reviews key categories and Tier levels in greenhouse gas inventories, identifies TER issues in the LULUCF sector, and examines how these issues vary according to key category status and Tier level. The results indicate that key categories and higher-tier approaches require greater transparency in inventory estimation, whereas non-key categories and lower-tier approaches place greater emphasis on completeness. Based on these findings, this study proposes three national strategies and provides policy implications for South Korea’s upcoming TER process and future BTR preparation.
    번역하기

    The Paris Agreement establishes the principles of Transparency, Accuracy, Consistency, Comparability, and Completeness (TACCC) under the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), strengthening the Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system bey...

    The Paris Agreement establishes the principles of Transparency, Accuracy, Consistency, Comparability, and Completeness (TACCC) under the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), strengthening the Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system beyond the approach used under the Kyoto Protocol. TACCC principles serve as criteria in the Technical Expert Review (TER), which assesses each country’s implementation and progress by reviewing Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs) and National Inventory Documents (NIDs). Among inventory sectors, Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), which accounts for approximately 6 17% of total CO2 emissions, plays an important role as both a carbon sink and a land-based resource. Therefore, examining TER findings with a focus on the LULUCF sector is essential. However, previous studies have generally examined transparency systems and inventory estimation separately, with limited application of TACCC principles to TER findings. This study analyzes TER issues in relation to Tier levels within the LULUCF sector.
    Annex I Parties that submitted TER reports and addenda were selected for analysis. The study reviews key categories and Tier levels in greenhouse gas inventories, identifies TER issues in the LULUCF sector, and examines how these issues vary according to key category status and Tier level. The results indicate that key categories and higher-tier approaches require greater transparency in inventory estimation, whereas non-key categories and lower-tier approaches place greater emphasis on completeness. Based on these findings, this study proposes three national strategies and provides policy implications for South Korea’s upcoming TER process and future BTR preparation.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼