혁신환경 변화에 대응하는 국가연구개발 행정제도 개선 방향

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to the rapidly changing economic, social and technological changes due to Covid-19, it is important to find ways to respond through R&D. In particular, Korea achieved economic growth through government-led R&D, and recently, growth through harmony with improved private R&D is becoming increasingly important. To respond to this, the government enacted the National R&D Innovation Act and the innovation of the R&D investment system.

In this study, we tried to find the issues that emerged through the enactment of the innovation act and to draw implications. First, the R&D administrative systems of major countries that can respond to Koreas innovation act were examined and related issues were derived. Second, the role of the innovation act from the point of view of the legal system and the issues of the innovation act from the perspective of R&D cooperation as a response to environmental changes were analyzed. Third, issues related to the legalization and operation of the innovation act, the issues of the innovation act from the perspective of industry-university-research, which are major R&D actors, and main issues from the point of view of intellectual property, which can be said to be the main characteristics of the innovation act, were explored and analyzed. Finally, implications were drawn based on these analyzes.

The implications of this study are as follows. First, the role of the Innovation Act needs to be expanded to not only conduct and manage current R&D, but also promote the utilization of outcomes. Second, it is necessary to clarify the main philosophical direction that the innovation act aims. In particular, it is necessary to clearly establish a philosophical standard that distinguishes autonomy and effectiveness. Third, it is necessary to consider how to engage various research and management interests for system improvement, open up the improvement process more, and lead to rational improvement by consensus rather than decision and implementation. Fourth, to further promote convergence researches, it is necessary to review regulations related to joint research and to establish an agreement method for each ministry and department. Lastly, the commercialization of research results should be included in the Innovation Act.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• [표지]
• [목차]
• 표목차
• 그림목차
• [요약]
• 1. 서론
• 2. 혁신환경의 변화와 제도적 대응
• 3. 국내외 연구개발 행정체계
• 4. 국가연구개발 행정의 핵심 제도로서의 혁신법 진단
• 5. 혁신법 운영 및 적용상의 이슈 분석
• 6. 시사점
• [제1장 서론]
• [제2장 혁신환경의 변화와 제도적 대응]
• 제1절 경제·사회·기술 환경의 변화
• 제2절 제도적 대응 현황
• [제3장 국내외 연구개발 행정체계]
• 제1절 미국
• 제2절 독일
• 제3절 일본
• 제4절 한국
• 제5절 국내외 연구개발 행정체계 분석을 통한 시사점
• [제4장 국가연구개발 행정의 핵심 제도로서의 혁신법 진단]
• 제1절 미래 환경 대응 관점의 혁신법의 역할
• 제2절 혁신법의 제도적 특징과 주요 논점
• 제3절 연구 협력 촉진 관점의 혁신법 이슈 진단
• 제4절 법·제도·연구협력 관점의 시사점
• [제5장 혁신법 운영 및 적용상의 이슈 분석]
• 제1절 국가연구개발행정제도 개선절차 및 과정
• 제2절 혁신법기반 국가연구개발행정제도 주요 이슈와 쟁점
• 제3절 연구수행 주체들의 혁신법 수용 관련 이슈
• 제4절 국가연구개발혁신법과 지식재산 이슈
• [제6장 결론 및 시사점]
• 1. 해외 연구개발 행정체계 분석을 통한 결론 및 시사점
• 2. 법제도의 속성과 역할 관점의 결론 및 시사점
• 3. 국가연구개발혁신법의 원활한 운영 및 적용 측면의 결론 및 시사점
• 4. 산학연 이해관계자 혁신법 수용성 제고측면의 결론 및 시사점
• 5. 혁신성과로서의 지식재산 측면의 결론 및 시사점
• [참고문헌]
• [부록]
• [Summary]
• [Contents]