RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Analysis of Human Tissue Management Models for Medical Research: Preparation for Implementation of the 2012 Revision of the Bioethics and Safety Act of Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104781988

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Efficient management of human tissue samples is a critical issue; the supply of samples is unable to satisfy the current demands for research. Lack of informed consent is also an ethical problem. One of the goals of the 2012 revision of Korea’s Bioethics and Safety Act was to implement regulations that govern the management of human tissue samples. To remain competitive, medical institutions must prepare for these future changes. In this report, we review two tissue management models that are currently in use; model 1 is the most common system utilized by hospitals in Korea and model 2 is implemented by some of the larger institutions. We also propose three alternative models that offer advantages over the systems currently in use. Model 3 is a multi-bank model that protects the independence of physicians and pathologists. Model 4 utilizes a comprehensive single bioresource bank; although in this case, the pathologists gain control of the samples,which may make it difficult to implement. Model 5, which employs a bioresource utilization steering committee (BUSC), is viable to implement and still maintains the advantages of Model 4. To comply with the upcoming law, we suggest that physicians and pathologists in an institution should collaborate to choose one of the improved models of tissue management system that best fits for their situation.
      번역하기

      Efficient management of human tissue samples is a critical issue; the supply of samples is unable to satisfy the current demands for research. Lack of informed consent is also an ethical problem. One of the goals of the 2012 revision of Korea’s Bioe...

      Efficient management of human tissue samples is a critical issue; the supply of samples is unable to satisfy the current demands for research. Lack of informed consent is also an ethical problem. One of the goals of the 2012 revision of Korea’s Bioethics and Safety Act was to implement regulations that govern the management of human tissue samples. To remain competitive, medical institutions must prepare for these future changes. In this report, we review two tissue management models that are currently in use; model 1 is the most common system utilized by hospitals in Korea and model 2 is implemented by some of the larger institutions. We also propose three alternative models that offer advantages over the systems currently in use. Model 3 is a multi-bank model that protects the independence of physicians and pathologists. Model 4 utilizes a comprehensive single bioresource bank; although in this case, the pathologists gain control of the samples,which may make it difficult to implement. Model 5, which employs a bioresource utilization steering committee (BUSC), is viable to implement and still maintains the advantages of Model 4. To comply with the upcoming law, we suggest that physicians and pathologists in an institution should collaborate to choose one of the improved models of tissue management system that best fits for their situation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 류영준, "한국의 연구중심병원의 연구용 인체조직 관리체계 향상을 위한 제언" 대한의사협회 55 (55): 292-303, 2012

      2 Gefenas E, "Turning residual human biological materials into research collections: playing with consent" 38 : 351-355, 2012

      3 Bevilacqua G, "The role of the pathologist in tissue banking: European Consensus Expert Group Report" 456 : 449-454, 2010

      4 Baik SJ, "Summary of bioethics and safty act: bioethics forum"

      5 Stephenson J, "Pathologists enter debate on consent for genetic research on stored tissue" 275 : 503-504, 1996

      6 "Medical Service Act of Korea. No.10387: article 22"

      7 Giannini C, "Maintaining clinical tissue archives and supporting human research: challenges and solutions" 135 : 347-353, 2011

      8 "Bioethics and Safety Act of Korea. No.11250: article 36 ②: enforcement rule: article 33①"

      9 Riegman PH, "Biobanking residual tissues" 130 : 357-368, 2011

      10 Hewitt RE, "Biobanking : the foundation of personalized medicine" 23 : 112-119, 2011

      1 류영준, "한국의 연구중심병원의 연구용 인체조직 관리체계 향상을 위한 제언" 대한의사협회 55 (55): 292-303, 2012

      2 Gefenas E, "Turning residual human biological materials into research collections: playing with consent" 38 : 351-355, 2012

      3 Bevilacqua G, "The role of the pathologist in tissue banking: European Consensus Expert Group Report" 456 : 449-454, 2010

      4 Baik SJ, "Summary of bioethics and safty act: bioethics forum"

      5 Stephenson J, "Pathologists enter debate on consent for genetic research on stored tissue" 275 : 503-504, 1996

      6 "Medical Service Act of Korea. No.10387: article 22"

      7 Giannini C, "Maintaining clinical tissue archives and supporting human research: challenges and solutions" 135 : 347-353, 2011

      8 "Bioethics and Safety Act of Korea. No.11250: article 36 ②: enforcement rule: article 33①"

      9 Riegman PH, "Biobanking residual tissues" 130 : 357-368, 2011

      10 Hewitt RE, "Biobanking : the foundation of personalized medicine" 23 : 112-119, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼