RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대학생의 도덕지향과 딜레마의 내용, 성별 및 개방성의 관계 = The relationships among dilemmas content, gender, openness, and moral orientations of undergraduates

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82569723

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships among dilemma content, gender, openness, and moral orientations of undergraduates. The subjects were 149(males 66, females 83)undergraduates. The two moral dilemmas were used in the present study were adopted from Crandall et al(1999). The data were processed by paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, chi-square and Pearson`s product correlation. The results of the study were as follows; First, moral orientations were significant difference in dilemma content. Second, moral orientations were not significant difference in gender but female participants evidenced more degree of caring orientation than male in dilemma of child custody decision, so we would be proper consideration gender and dilemma content together. Third, there was a significant positive correlation between openness and caring orientation, but there was not significant correlation between openness and justice orientation. We need to develop standardized dilemmas that the content is included in justice and caring contexts equally.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships among dilemma content, gender, openness, and moral orientations of undergraduates. The subjects were 149(males 66, females 83)undergraduates. The two moral dilemmas were used in the present st...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships among dilemma content, gender, openness, and moral orientations of undergraduates. The subjects were 149(males 66, females 83)undergraduates. The two moral dilemmas were used in the present study were adopted from Crandall et al(1999). The data were processed by paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, chi-square and Pearson`s product correlation. The results of the study were as follows; First, moral orientations were significant difference in dilemma content. Second, moral orientations were not significant difference in gender but female participants evidenced more degree of caring orientation than male in dilemma of child custody decision, so we would be proper consideration gender and dilemma content together. Third, there was a significant positive correlation between openness and caring orientation, but there was not significant correlation between openness and justice orientation. We need to develop standardized dilemmas that the content is included in justice and caring contexts equally.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kurtines, W. M., "도덕성의 발달과 심리(Moral development)" 학지사 2004

    2 문용린, "도덕성 발달과 심리" 학지사 2004

    3 서미옥, "대학생의 도덕행동에 영향을 미치는 4구성요소의 경로분석" 한국교육학회 45 (45): 25-51, 2007

    4 김광웅, "가상적 딜레마와 실생활 딜레마에 관한 토론상황에 나타난 어머니와 자녀의 도덕적 추리수준" 2 (2): 83-94, 1995

    5 서미옥, "가상적 딜레마와 교직 실생활 딜레마에서 나타난 예비교사들의 도덕지향" 중등교육연구소 57 (57): 169-190, 2009

    6 Wark, G. R., "The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life" 29 (29): 5-21, 2000

    7 Hart, J. W., "The big five and achievement motivation: Exploring the relationship between personality and a tow-factor model of motivation" 5 (5): 267-274, 2007

    8 Costa, P. T., "The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Odessa" Psychological Assessment Resources 1985

    9 Walker, L., "The Model and the measure: an appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development" 31 (31): 353-367, 2002

    10 Dollinger, S. J., "On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience" 30 (30): 12-41, 1996

    1 Kurtines, W. M., "도덕성의 발달과 심리(Moral development)" 학지사 2004

    2 문용린, "도덕성 발달과 심리" 학지사 2004

    3 서미옥, "대학생의 도덕행동에 영향을 미치는 4구성요소의 경로분석" 한국교육학회 45 (45): 25-51, 2007

    4 김광웅, "가상적 딜레마와 실생활 딜레마에 관한 토론상황에 나타난 어머니와 자녀의 도덕적 추리수준" 2 (2): 83-94, 1995

    5 서미옥, "가상적 딜레마와 교직 실생활 딜레마에서 나타난 예비교사들의 도덕지향" 중등교육연구소 57 (57): 169-190, 2009

    6 Wark, G. R., "The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life" 29 (29): 5-21, 2000

    7 Hart, J. W., "The big five and achievement motivation: Exploring the relationship between personality and a tow-factor model of motivation" 5 (5): 267-274, 2007

    8 Costa, P. T., "The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Odessa" Psychological Assessment Resources 1985

    9 Walker, L., "The Model and the measure: an appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development" 31 (31): 353-367, 2002

    10 Dollinger, S. J., "On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience" 30 (30): 12-41, 1996

    11 Crandall, C. S., "Newsworthy moral dilemmas: Justice, caring, and gender" 40 (40): 187-209, 1999

    12 Dawson, T. L., "New tools, new insights: Kohlberg's moral judgement stages revisited. International" 26 (26): 154-166, 2002

    13 Rest, J. R., "Morality. in: Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development. vol. 3" John Willy & Sons 1983

    14 Agerstrom, J., "Moral reasoning: The influence of affective personality, dilemma, content and gender" 34 (34): 1259-1276, 2006

    15 Haviv, D., "Moral decision-making in real life: factors affecting moral orientation and behaviour justification" 31 (31): 121-140, 2002

    16 Kurtines, W. M., "Moral Development: An introduction" Allyn & Bacon 1995

    17 Redford, J. L., "Intuition and moral development" 129 (129): 91-101, 1994

    18 Krebs, D. L., "Interpersonal moral conflicts between couples: Effects of type of dilemma, role, and partner's judgements on level of moral reasoning and probability" 9 (9): 307-316, 2002

    19 Gilligan, C., "In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development" Harvard University Press 1982

    20 Clancy, S. M., "Identity, self, and personality: Identity status and the five-factor model of personality" 3 (3): 227-245, 1993

    21 Wark, G. R., "Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judg" 32 (32): 220-230, 1996

    22 Bjorklund, F., "Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: Effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness" 44 (44): 459-466, 2003

    23 Bjorklund, F., "Defense mechanisms and morality: A ilnk between isolation and moralization" 41 (41): 55-61, 2000

    24 Gilligan, C., "ADolescent development reconsidered. in: Mapping the Moral Domai: a contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education" Harvard University Press 1988

    25 Dollinger, S. J., "A Note on moral reasoning and the five-factor model" 13 (13): 349-358, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-03-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SECONDARY EDUCATION RESEARCH KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.63 1.63 1.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.38 1.27 1.781 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼