RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      헌법 개정에 관한 연구 -책임정치구현과 통일 헌법을 중심으로- = A Study on Constitutional Revision in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100425760

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper reexamines the discussion about Constitutional Revision that has recently occurred in Korea. There have been a lot of discussion on the revision of the constitution law in Korea. While it is necessary to analyze the discussions, it is also important to investigate the necessity of the constitutional revision despite great expense and to discuss the relevance of the basic direction for the constitutional revision. This paper will attempt to identify the characteristics of the recent amendment debates, as well as the historical meaning of the Constitution. And then it will reexamine the reformists’ arguments regarding the necessity of the amendment, and it will analyze the concrete issues through a critical and cautious view. This study discussed an actual necessity of the revision of articles for fundamental rights in the constitution based on the results of review above and complementary measures through constitutional interpretation and enactment in case of the practical difficulty to the immediate constitutional revision Using references to the Constitutional Amendment debates about the form of government, will argue that in the current Constitution, the issue with the form of government is caused by institutional operations rather than by the institution itself. I will thus suggest that the Constitution should be partly amended while maintaining the current presidential system, rather than being fully amended through the introduction of new institutions such as the parliamentary system. Nevertheless we must establish new constitution to assure real protection of fundamental rights, check and balance of power and, rule of law. Finally, I maintain that long-term constitutional research through a neutral Institute must continue in order to adopt the new Constitution for the coming united Korean period and for the future constitutional vision.
      번역하기

      This paper reexamines the discussion about Constitutional Revision that has recently occurred in Korea. There have been a lot of discussion on the revision of the constitution law in Korea. While it is necessary to analyze the discussions, it is also...

      This paper reexamines the discussion about Constitutional Revision that has recently occurred in Korea. There have been a lot of discussion on the revision of the constitution law in Korea. While it is necessary to analyze the discussions, it is also important to investigate the necessity of the constitutional revision despite great expense and to discuss the relevance of the basic direction for the constitutional revision. This paper will attempt to identify the characteristics of the recent amendment debates, as well as the historical meaning of the Constitution. And then it will reexamine the reformists’ arguments regarding the necessity of the amendment, and it will analyze the concrete issues through a critical and cautious view. This study discussed an actual necessity of the revision of articles for fundamental rights in the constitution based on the results of review above and complementary measures through constitutional interpretation and enactment in case of the practical difficulty to the immediate constitutional revision Using references to the Constitutional Amendment debates about the form of government, will argue that in the current Constitution, the issue with the form of government is caused by institutional operations rather than by the institution itself. I will thus suggest that the Constitution should be partly amended while maintaining the current presidential system, rather than being fully amended through the introduction of new institutions such as the parliamentary system. Nevertheless we must establish new constitution to assure real protection of fundamental rights, check and balance of power and, rule of law. Finally, I maintain that long-term constitutional research through a neutral Institute must continue in order to adopt the new Constitution for the coming united Korean period and for the future constitutional vision.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2008

      2 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2006

      3 계희열, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2007

      4 "헌법연구자문위원회 결과보고서" 2009

      5 김형성, "헌법개정의 과제와 전망" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 9-36, 2006

      6 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2010

      7 강태수, "집행부에 관한 헌법개정론" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 485-513, 2006

      8 최봉석, "지방자치의 보장을 위한 헌법개정의 과제" 한국선진화정책학회 25-69, 2008

      9 열린정책연구원, "주요개헌쟁점 자료집"

      10 이관희, "정치개혁의 입법적 과제" 21 : 1-34, 2001

      1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2008

      2 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2006

      3 계희열, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2007

      4 "헌법연구자문위원회 결과보고서" 2009

      5 김형성, "헌법개정의 과제와 전망" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 9-36, 2006

      6 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2010

      7 강태수, "집행부에 관한 헌법개정론" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 485-513, 2006

      8 최봉석, "지방자치의 보장을 위한 헌법개정의 과제" 한국선진화정책학회 25-69, 2008

      9 열린정책연구원, "주요개헌쟁점 자료집"

      10 이관희, "정치개혁의 입법적 과제" 21 : 1-34, 2001

      11 신우철, "정부형태, 과연 바꾸어야 하는가? - 최근 개헌론에 대한 헌법공학적 비판과 대안 -" 한국헌법학회 8 (8): 451-480, 2002

      12 권영성, "비교헌법학" 법문사 1981

      13 계희열, "독일헌법학원론" 박영사 1991

      14 임종훈, "국정감사·조사제도의 재조명" 한국헌법학회 10 (10): 47-73, 2004

      15 장영수, "국민과 함께하는 개헌이야기" 국회 미래한국헌법연구회 2010

      16 임종훈, "국가권력구조의 개편방향" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 73-94, 2006

      17 김승환, "大統領選擧制度와 憲法改正" 한국헌법학회 7 (7): 169-188, 2001

      18 Creifelds, Carl, "Rechtswoeterbuch" C.H.Beck 551-, 1983

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-10-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Law & Policy Institute -> The Institute of Law & Policy Jeju National University KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-04-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 법과정책연구소 -> 법과정책연구원 KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-10-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Law & Policy Review KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-04-02 학회명변경 한글명 : 사회과학연구소 -> 법과정책연구소
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Law & Policy Institute
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.57 0.51 0.735 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼