侵犯消费者知情权与欺诈认定的关系探究 — 宾利豪车天价赔偿案评释

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The facts of car sales fraud cases are different, and the role of details in the identification of fraud cannot be ignored. Whether the operator constitutes fraud as he fails to fulfill his statutory obligation to inform consumers and violates consumers’ right to know or not, it is necessary to explore the relationship between these two. The judgment of this case provides a principled path for the future trial of similar cases: while judging whether the operator violates the statutory disclosure obligation constitutes fraud in the Consumer Protection Law should Focus on the following factors: whether it affects the fundamental purpose of consumer contracting, and whether there is a subjective intention to conceal relevant information. It has guiding significances for promoting the reasonable protection of automobile consumers’ right to know and the orderly development of the automobile industry.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 摘要
• 引言
• 一、案例梳理
• 二、案例评析
• 三、结语
• 參考文獻
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 牟宪魁, "说明义务违反与沉默的民事诈欺构成" (4) : 2007

2 陆青, "论消费者保护法上的告知义务——兼评最高人民法院第17号指导性案例" (4) : 2014

3 梁慧星, "消费者权益保护法第49条的解释与适用" 2001

4 张淳, "浅议对告知义务不履行与沉默欺诈" (秋季) : 2001

5 维尔纳, "法律行为论" 法律出版社 2013

6 张蜀俊, "汽车销售：局部欺诈应整体双倍赔偿" 2007

7 近江幸治, "民法讲义Ⅰ民法总则" 北京大学出版社 2015

8 山本敬三, "民法讲义Ⅰ总则" 北京大学出版社 2012

9 梅仲协, "民法要义" 中国政法大学出版社 1998

10 朱庆育, "民法总论" 北京大学出版社 2016

11 梁慧星, "民法总论" 法律出版社 2017

12 孙宪忠, "民法总论" 社会科学文献出版社 2010

13 李永军, "民法总论" 法律出版社 2009

14 史尚宽, "民法总论" 中国政法大学出版社 2000

15 王泽鉴, "民法总则" 北京大学出版社 2014

16 海因, "欧洲合同法(上）" 法律出版社 2001

17 林春艳, "新消法后首例汽车销售欺诈“退一赔三”案述评" (6) : 2018

18 杨立新, "我国消费者保护惩罚性赔偿的新发展" (2) : 2014

19 卡尔, "德国民法通论(下册）" 法律出版社 2013

20 本德, "德国民法总论" 法律出版社 2017

21 迪特尔, "德国民法总论" 法律出版社 2013

22 肖斌, "<消费者权益保护法>中“欺诈行为”的认定" (10) : 2015