RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Paper-based versus Image-based Scoring of Student Essays

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104736746

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Essays have been incorporated into many of the standardized language testing programs since assessing students’ writing ability directly using essays has many values. However, scoring a large quantity of student essays is costly and time consuming. Paper-based scoring, which refers to scoring of essays on paper as submitted by students, had been the standard practice of essay scoring until image-based scoring, which refers to scoring of scanned images of essays, became available due to advances in computerized scanning technicology. Because various aspects of image-based scoring could make it potentially different from paper-based scoring, causing concerns for the reliability of the assessment made, the current study compared paper-based and image-based essay scoring modes using essays from the Georgia 8th Grade Supplemental Writing Assessment in order to examine the impact of image-based scoring on the reliability of essay test scores. The results showed that paper-based and image-based scoring were similar in terms of reliability, providing evidence for the comparability of paper-based and image-based scoring. Although limited in scope, this study adds to the literature on writing assessment by presenting empirical evidence in support of the transition from paper-based scoring practice to image-based scoring practice.
    번역하기

    Essays have been incorporated into many of the standardized language testing programs since assessing students’ writing ability directly using essays has many values. However, scoring a large quantity of student essays is costly and time consuming. ...

    Essays have been incorporated into many of the standardized language testing programs since assessing students’ writing ability directly using essays has many values. However, scoring a large quantity of student essays is costly and time consuming. Paper-based scoring, which refers to scoring of essays on paper as submitted by students, had been the standard practice of essay scoring until image-based scoring, which refers to scoring of scanned images of essays, became available due to advances in computerized scanning technicology. Because various aspects of image-based scoring could make it potentially different from paper-based scoring, causing concerns for the reliability of the assessment made, the current study compared paper-based and image-based essay scoring modes using essays from the Georgia 8th Grade Supplemental Writing Assessment in order to examine the impact of image-based scoring on the reliability of essay test scores. The results showed that paper-based and image-based scoring were similar in terms of reliability, providing evidence for the comparability of paper-based and image-based scoring. Although limited in scope, this study adds to the literature on writing assessment by presenting empirical evidence in support of the transition from paper-based scoring practice to image-based scoring practice.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Powers, D., "Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word-processed essays" 31 : 220-233, 1994

    2 Sturman, L, "To e or not to e? A comparison of electronic marking and paper-based marking" 2003

    3 ETS, "The results of the NAEP 1993 field test for the 1994 National Assessment of Educational Progress" Author 1993

    4 Twing, J., "The Comparability of paper-based and image-based marking of a high-stakes, large-scale writing assessment" 2003

    5 이요안, "Reevaluating Advanced Speaking Proficiency for Korean Teachers of English: A Case Study" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 303-336, 2009

    6 Powers, D, "Qualifying essay readers for an on-line scoring network" ETS Report 1998

    7 Bennett,R.E, "On-line assessment and the comparability of score meaning (ETS RM-03-05)" Educational Testing Service 2003

    8 Chung, G., "Methodological approaches to online scoring of essays" National Center for Research on Evaluation,Standards,and Student Testing 1997

    9 Lunz, M. E, "Measuring the impact of judge severity on examination scores" 3 : 331-345, 1990

    10 Linacre,J.M, "Many-facet Rasch measurement" MESA Press 1989

    1 Powers, D., "Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word-processed essays" 31 : 220-233, 1994

    2 Sturman, L, "To e or not to e? A comparison of electronic marking and paper-based marking" 2003

    3 ETS, "The results of the NAEP 1993 field test for the 1994 National Assessment of Educational Progress" Author 1993

    4 Twing, J., "The Comparability of paper-based and image-based marking of a high-stakes, large-scale writing assessment" 2003

    5 이요안, "Reevaluating Advanced Speaking Proficiency for Korean Teachers of English: A Case Study" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 303-336, 2009

    6 Powers, D, "Qualifying essay readers for an on-line scoring network" ETS Report 1998

    7 Bennett,R.E, "On-line assessment and the comparability of score meaning (ETS RM-03-05)" Educational Testing Service 2003

    8 Chung, G., "Methodological approaches to online scoring of essays" National Center for Research on Evaluation,Standards,and Student Testing 1997

    9 Lunz, M. E, "Measuring the impact of judge severity on examination scores" 3 : 331-345, 1990

    10 Linacre,J.M, "Many-facet Rasch measurement" MESA Press 1989

    11 안경자, "Learning to Write Academic English: A Sociocultural Perspective on L2 Learners’ Writing Portfolios" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 1-34, 2009

    12 Bachman, L. F, "Language testing in practice" Oxford University Press 1996

    13 Kreiman,C, "Investigating the effects of training and rater variables on reliability measures: A comparison of standup local scoring, online distributed scoring, and online local scoring" 2007

    14 Linacre,J.M, "Facets Rasch measurement computer program. Version 3.58.0"

    15 UCLES, "Electronic return of marks project" UCLES 2004

    16 Royal-Dawson,L, "Electronic marking with ETS software" 2003

    17 Powers, D, "Effects of mode of presentation on essay scores (ETS RM-97-08)" ETS 1997

    18 Yuah Vicky Chon, "Collocations in L2 Writing and Rater's Perceived Writing Proficiency" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 101-129, 2009

    19 Zhang, Y, "Applying the online scoring network (OSN) to advanced placement program (AP) tests" Educational Testing Service 2003

    20 Whetton, C., "An evaluation of on-line marking" 2002

    21 Powers, D., "A pilot test of online essay scoring" ETS 1997

    22 Stemler, S. E, "A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating inter-rater reliability"

    23 Cohen,J, "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales" 20 : 37-46, 1960

    24 Raikes, N, "A Report on the March 2004 OCR On-Screen marking Trial: The examiners’ experience" Internal UCLES report 2004

    25 유호정, "A Description of Connecting Reading and Writing in L2 Academic Writing through an Analysis of Classroom Talk" 한국응용언어학회 24 (24): 147-169, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.76 0.75 1.472 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼