RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독서와 작문: 그 개념의 변천과 지도 방법에의 시사점 = Reading and Writing: The Conceptual Change and its Implications for Literacy Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102063237

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this theoretical review about the relationship between reading and writing, the article focused on three aspects of literacy education: 1) the communication media development(communication by oral language, by written language, and by multi-mode media), 2) the conceptual development about reading and writing(cognitive constructivism, social constructivism, and sociocultural constructivism), and 3) the models of literacy instruction(explicit instruction model, process learning model, and ``reading-talking-writing`` instruction model). The three aspects of literacy, that is, media, concepts, and instructional models are very closely inter-related. The development of media brought about, in its natural outcome, the changes of the concept of reading and writing. And also the change of reading/writing concept brought about the instructional models of literacy. But, Although the technology of media has extensively developed, and the concept of literacy(reading and writing) has paradigmatically changed, the structural frame of communication and the agent of reading/writing are still unchanged. People use the three media(oral, written, and multi-mode media) in their daily communication. The readers and writers are also still unchanged. The meaning making processes in reading and writing are three-dimensional, that is, the processes are cognitive, social, and sociocultural at one time. In the paper, three instructional models are recommended for literacy education: Explicit instruction model, process learning model, and ``reading-talking-writing`` model. These three instructional models have their own unique characteristics. Teachers in classroom need to be well aware of the models, and select discreetly the best model in literacy education.
    번역하기

    In this theoretical review about the relationship between reading and writing, the article focused on three aspects of literacy education: 1) the communication media development(communication by oral language, by written language, and by multi-mode me...

    In this theoretical review about the relationship between reading and writing, the article focused on three aspects of literacy education: 1) the communication media development(communication by oral language, by written language, and by multi-mode media), 2) the conceptual development about reading and writing(cognitive constructivism, social constructivism, and sociocultural constructivism), and 3) the models of literacy instruction(explicit instruction model, process learning model, and ``reading-talking-writing`` instruction model). The three aspects of literacy, that is, media, concepts, and instructional models are very closely inter-related. The development of media brought about, in its natural outcome, the changes of the concept of reading and writing. And also the change of reading/writing concept brought about the instructional models of literacy. But, Although the technology of media has extensively developed, and the concept of literacy(reading and writing) has paradigmatically changed, the structural frame of communication and the agent of reading/writing are still unchanged. People use the three media(oral, written, and multi-mode media) in their daily communication. The readers and writers are also still unchanged. The meaning making processes in reading and writing are three-dimensional, that is, the processes are cognitive, social, and sociocultural at one time. In the paper, three instructional models are recommended for literacy education: Explicit instruction model, process learning model, and ``reading-talking-writing`` model. These three instructional models have their own unique characteristics. Teachers in classroom need to be well aware of the models, and select discreetly the best model in literacy education.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 노명완, "초등 저학년을 위한 문식성 교육" 초등국어교육학회 2010

    2 옥현진, "다중모드 문식성, In 문식성 교육 연구" 한국문화사 2008

    3 노명완, "국어과 교육론" 갑을 1988

    4 Graves. D. H., "Writing: Teachers and Children at Work" Heinemann 1991

    5 Slobin, D. I., "Psycholinguistics" Foresman and Company 1979

    6 Atwell, N., "In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning" Heinemann 1998

    7 Olson, D. R., "From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing" 3 : 257-, 1977

    8 Olson, D. R., "Culture, Technology and Intellect, In The Nature of Intelligence" Erlbaum 1976

    9 Collins, A., "Children's Reading Problems" Center for the Study of Reading 1979

    10 Rubin, A., "A “Theoretical Taxonomy of the Differences between Oral and Written Language”, In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension" Erlbaum 1980

    1 노명완, "초등 저학년을 위한 문식성 교육" 초등국어교육학회 2010

    2 옥현진, "다중모드 문식성, In 문식성 교육 연구" 한국문화사 2008

    3 노명완, "국어과 교육론" 갑을 1988

    4 Graves. D. H., "Writing: Teachers and Children at Work" Heinemann 1991

    5 Slobin, D. I., "Psycholinguistics" Foresman and Company 1979

    6 Atwell, N., "In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning" Heinemann 1998

    7 Olson, D. R., "From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing" 3 : 257-, 1977

    8 Olson, D. R., "Culture, Technology and Intellect, In The Nature of Intelligence" Erlbaum 1976

    9 Collins, A., "Children's Reading Problems" Center for the Study of Reading 1979

    10 Rubin, A., "A “Theoretical Taxonomy of the Differences between Oral and Written Language”, In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension" Erlbaum 1980

    11 Gelb, I. J., "A Study of Writing" The University of Chicago Press 1952

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼