RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Classification of 18F-Florbetaben Amyloid Brain PET Image using PCA-SVM

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106109335

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) allows early and accurate diagnosis in suspected cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and contributes to future treatment plans. In the present study, a method of implementing a diagnostic system to distinguish ...

      Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) allows early and accurate diagnosis in suspected cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and contributes to future treatment plans. In the present study, a method of implementing a diagnostic system to distinguish β-Amyloid (Aβ) positive from Aβ negative with objectiveness and accuracy was proposed using a machine learning approach, such as the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). 18F-Florbetaben (FBB) brain PET images were arranged in control and patients (total n = 176) with mild cognitive impairment and AD.
      An SVM was used to classify the slices of registered PET image using PET template, and a system was created to diagnose patients comprehensively from the output of the trained model. To compare the per-slice classification, the PCA-SVM model observing the whole brain (WB) region showed the highest performance (accuracy 92.38, specificity 92.87, sensitivity 92.87), followed by SVM with gray matter masking (GMM) (accuracy 92.22, specificity 92.13, sensitivity 92.28) for Aβ positivity. To compare according to per-subject classification, the PCA-SVM with WB also showed the highest performance (accuracy 89.21, specificity 71.67, sensitivity 98.28), followed by PCA-SVM with GMM (accuracy 85.80, specificity 61.67, sensitivity 98.28) for Aβ positivity. When comparing the area under curve (AUC), PCA-SVM with WB was the highest for per-slice classifiers (0.992), and the models except for SVM with WM were highest for the per-subject classifier (1.000). We can classify 18F-Florbetaben amyloid brain PET image for Aβ positivity using PCA-SVM model, with no additional effects on GMM.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강현, "VGG-based BAPL Score Classification of 18F-Florbetaben Amyloid Brain PET" 대한의생명과학회 24 (24): 418-425, 2018

      2 Segovia F, "Using CT data to improve the quantitative analysis of 18F-FBB PET neuroimages" 10 : 158-, 2018

      3 Moćkus J, "The Application of Bayesian Methods for Seeking the Extremum: Toward global optimization 2" Elsevier 117-, 1978

      4 Illán IA, "The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative" 181 : 903-916, 2011

      5 Piramal Imaging Limited, "Summary of product characteristics" Piramal Imaging Limited 2014

      6 Haass C, "Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide" 8 : 101-, 2007

      7 Lopresti BJ, "Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis" 46 : 1959-1972, 2005

      8 Lundeen TF, "Signs and artifacts in Amyloid PET" 38 : 2123-2133, 2018

      9 Pedregosa F, "Scikit-learn: machine learning in python" 12 : 2825-2830,

      10 Bergstra J, "Random search for hyper-parameter optimization" 13 : 281-305, 2012

      1 강현, "VGG-based BAPL Score Classification of 18F-Florbetaben Amyloid Brain PET" 대한의생명과학회 24 (24): 418-425, 2018

      2 Segovia F, "Using CT data to improve the quantitative analysis of 18F-FBB PET neuroimages" 10 : 158-, 2018

      3 Moćkus J, "The Application of Bayesian Methods for Seeking the Extremum: Toward global optimization 2" Elsevier 117-, 1978

      4 Illán IA, "The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative" 181 : 903-916, 2011

      5 Piramal Imaging Limited, "Summary of product characteristics" Piramal Imaging Limited 2014

      6 Haass C, "Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide" 8 : 101-, 2007

      7 Lopresti BJ, "Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis" 46 : 1959-1972, 2005

      8 Lundeen TF, "Signs and artifacts in Amyloid PET" 38 : 2123-2133, 2018

      9 Pedregosa F, "Scikit-learn: machine learning in python" 12 : 2825-2830,

      10 Bergstra J, "Random search for hyper-parameter optimization" 13 : 281-305, 2012

      11 Platt J, "Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods" 10 : 61-74, 1999

      12 Oh IS, "Pattern recognition" Kyobobook 137-173, 2008

      13 Bullich S, "Optimized classification of 18F-Florbetaben PET scans as positive and negative using an SUVR quantitative approach and comparison to visual assessment" 15 : 325-332, 2017

      14 Tamil Iniyan Gunasekaran, "MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Modern Advancements in the Treatment" 대한의생명과학회 21 (21): 1-8, 2015

      15 Brucher N, "Measurement of inter- and intra-observer variability in the routine clinical interpretation of brain 18-FDG PET-CT" 29 : 233-239, 2015

      16 Snoek J, "In Advances in Neural Information Processing System" 2951-2959, 2012

      17 Seibyl J, "Impact of training method on the robustness of the visual assessment of 18F-Florbetaben PET scan: results from a phase-3 study" 57 : 900-906, 2016

      18 Gonçalves AB, "Feature extraction and machine learning for the classification of Brazilian savannah pollen grains" 11 : e0157044-, 2016

      19 Chaves R, "FDG and PIB biomarker PET analysis for the Alzheimer's disease detection using Association Rules" s2576-s2579, 2012

      20 Gulshan V, "Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs" 316 : 2402-2410, 2016

      21 Lakhani P, "Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks" 284 : 574-582, 2017

      22 Taylor JC, "Comparison of machine learning and semiquantification algorithms for (I123) FP-CIT classification: the beginning of the end for semi-quantification?" 4 : 29-, 2017

      23 DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach" 44 : 837-845, 1988

      24 Barthel H, "Cerebral amyloid-β PET with florbetaben (18F) in patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls: a multicenter phase 2 diagnostic study" 10 : 424-435, 2011

      25 Blanc-Durand P, "Cerebral 18F-FDG PET in macrophagic myofasciitis: An individual SVM-based approach" 12 : e0181152-, 2017

      26 Xue DX, "CNN-SVM for microvascular morphological type recognition with data augmentation" 36 : 755-764, 2016

      27 Varma S, "Bias in error estimation when using crossvalidation for model selection" 7 : 91-, 2006

      28 Choi WH, "Automated quantification of amyloid positron emission tomography: a comparison of PMOD and MIMNEURO" 30 : 682-689, 2016

      29 Zhang Y, "A hybrid method for MRI brain image classification" 38 : 10049-10053, 2011

      30 Sherman M, "A comparison between bootstrap methods and generalized estimating equations for correlate outcomes in generalized linear models" 26 : 901-925, 1997

      31 Vapnik VN, "10.5 Support Vector Machine: Statistical Learning Theory" Wiley-Interscience 421-441, 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-04-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Experimental and Biomedical Sciences -> Biomedical Science Letters KCI등재
      2011-03-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences -> Journal of Experimental and Biomedical Sciences KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.4 0.4 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.19 0.347 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼