RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      동북아 경제협력을 위한 농업생산요소 및 농산물 교역구조 분석 = Analysis of the Factor Endowments and Agricultural Trade for Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104155423

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Agricultural production factors, productivity and trade structures of China, Japan and Korea were analyzed. Their agriculture has mutual complementarity arising from differences in factor endowments as well as mutual competitiveness caused by similarities in production structure. Although agriculture of the three countries can be characterized by small-scale farming in common, the capital/labor ratio and the labor/land ratios are much different by country. As a result, Japan and Korea have advantages in producing labor saving and capital intensive products while China has advantages in labor intensive and capital saving products. Since agricultural productivity of factors such as labor, land and capital showed huge differences by country, mutually beneficiary development might be possible through the agricultural cooperation in the Northeast Asian region. Agricultural products of China, Japan and Korea can be classified into two groups of mutually competitive and complementary products. Regional cooperation in agriculture can be vitalized by combining production of mutually competitive products at certain levels in each country with internalizing trade of mutually complementary products. Unfortunately, however, agricultural exports are more and more competitive as the export similarity indices are high and degree of export competition is increasing in the region. For the regional agriculture, sharing markets in the region through establishing complementary systems of utilizing production factors would be better than seeking monopolistic rent or market domination through unlimited competition with each other. Price competition based on the concept of comparative advantage assumes production specialization. However, such kind of competitive advantage is likely to disappear when relative factor prices change as the national economy grows. Consequently, agricultural markets in the region might be dominated by any competitor outside the region. China, Japan and Korea are at different stages of economic development and have huge differences in income levels that would result in different consumer's tastes in each country. Accordingly, diverse measures of agricultural cooperation could be sought including continuous introduction of new products, differentiation of existing products, technological transfer, and production sharing among the countries in the region. If these measures for the cooperation could contribute to establishing systems for intra-industry division of labor in agricultural sector, social welfare will apparently increase through the trade creation and diversions in the region.
      번역하기

      Agricultural production factors, productivity and trade structures of China, Japan and Korea were analyzed. Their agriculture has mutual complementarity arising from differences in factor endowments as well as mutual competitiveness caused by similari...

      Agricultural production factors, productivity and trade structures of China, Japan and Korea were analyzed. Their agriculture has mutual complementarity arising from differences in factor endowments as well as mutual competitiveness caused by similarities in production structure. Although agriculture of the three countries can be characterized by small-scale farming in common, the capital/labor ratio and the labor/land ratios are much different by country. As a result, Japan and Korea have advantages in producing labor saving and capital intensive products while China has advantages in labor intensive and capital saving products. Since agricultural productivity of factors such as labor, land and capital showed huge differences by country, mutually beneficiary development might be possible through the agricultural cooperation in the Northeast Asian region. Agricultural products of China, Japan and Korea can be classified into two groups of mutually competitive and complementary products. Regional cooperation in agriculture can be vitalized by combining production of mutually competitive products at certain levels in each country with internalizing trade of mutually complementary products. Unfortunately, however, agricultural exports are more and more competitive as the export similarity indices are high and degree of export competition is increasing in the region. For the regional agriculture, sharing markets in the region through establishing complementary systems of utilizing production factors would be better than seeking monopolistic rent or market domination through unlimited competition with each other. Price competition based on the concept of comparative advantage assumes production specialization. However, such kind of competitive advantage is likely to disappear when relative factor prices change as the national economy grows. Consequently, agricultural markets in the region might be dominated by any competitor outside the region. China, Japan and Korea are at different stages of economic development and have huge differences in income levels that would result in different consumer's tastes in each country. Accordingly, diverse measures of agricultural cooperation could be sought including continuous introduction of new products, differentiation of existing products, technological transfer, and production sharing among the countries in the region. If these measures for the cooperation could contribute to establishing systems for intra-industry division of labor in agricultural sector, social welfare will apparently increase through the trade creation and diversions in the region.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Transformation of Agricultural Structure: Its Beginning and Ending" 21 : 1997

      2 "NE Asian Trade Structure and Comparison of Regional Export Competitiveness" 1992

      3 "Measures for Expanding Agricultural Trade and Cooperations between Korea and China after China's Joining to the WTO" Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2002

      4 "Korea's Strategy for Becoming a Northeast Asian Business Hub" KIEP -20, 2002

      5 "Korea's FTA Policy Background and Long-Term Strategy" 2002

      6 "Korea's Agricultural Technology Development and Cooperation Possibility with China" 2001

      7 "China-Japan-Korea Industrial Competitiveness; Comparative Analysis" 2003

      8 "China-Japan- Korea Economic Cooperation: Directions of Development" KIET 2000

      9 "China's Farm Products Supply and Production Structure" Korea Rural Economic Institute 2002

      10 "China's Economic Developments and Potential, Seo Jong-Hyuk et al., Measures for Enhancing Agricultural Cooperation in Northeast Asia" Korea Rural Economic Institute 2001

      1 "Transformation of Agricultural Structure: Its Beginning and Ending" 21 : 1997

      2 "NE Asian Trade Structure and Comparison of Regional Export Competitiveness" 1992

      3 "Measures for Expanding Agricultural Trade and Cooperations between Korea and China after China's Joining to the WTO" Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2002

      4 "Korea's Strategy for Becoming a Northeast Asian Business Hub" KIEP -20, 2002

      5 "Korea's FTA Policy Background and Long-Term Strategy" 2002

      6 "Korea's Agricultural Technology Development and Cooperation Possibility with China" 2001

      7 "China-Japan-Korea Industrial Competitiveness; Comparative Analysis" 2003

      8 "China-Japan- Korea Economic Cooperation: Directions of Development" KIET 2000

      9 "China's Farm Products Supply and Production Structure" Korea Rural Economic Institute 2002

      10 "China's Economic Developments and Potential, Seo Jong-Hyuk et al., Measures for Enhancing Agricultural Cooperation in Northeast Asia" Korea Rural Economic Institute 2001

      11 "Changing Patterns of East Asia's Trade and Direct Investment and a Policy Agenda" 1997

      12 "Agricultural Strategy for Korea- China FTA" KREI 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-09-15 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) KCI등재
      2016-05-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of East Asian Economic Integration -> East Asian Economic Review
      외국어명 : Journal of East Asian Economic Integration -> East Asian Economic Review
      KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-03-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대외경제연구 -> Journal of East Asian Economic Integration KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of International Economic Studies -> Journal of East Asian Economic Integration KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대외경제연구
      외국어명 : Journal of International Economic Studies
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.37 0.37 0.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.27 0.838 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼