RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      슬래브 道路橋에서 標準斷面과 最適斷面의 比較解析 = A Relative Analysis of Optimum Design Section and the Standard Section for Highway Slab Bridge

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75024697

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The revised Ministry of Construction (MOC) standard plans for highway slab bridge sections are analyzed and compared with optimum design section, according to the current requirement.
      The following observations are made;
      1. In using material, The optimum design section is showed more economical than the MOC standard section.
      2. The MOC standard plans does not utilize fully the capabilities of materials, of exceeds the allowable values.
      e.q.: Working stress of steel and concrete show significant amount of allowance(13 to 15% in the span 8 and 10m, while in the span 10m and 12m, the steel show 5 to 6%, and the concrete shows 1% to 4% exceedingly in comparison with the allowable values.)
      3. The distributor bars of the MOC standard plans are used ver 31 to 213% and contain some obvious discrepancies in details.
      e.q.: Distributor bars are either over under placed, and main reinforcements are placed inside the distributors to reduce the effective depths of the given sections.
      This indicates that the MOC standard plans are far from optimal and have plenty room to improve under the provailing design conditions.
      번역하기

      The revised Ministry of Construction (MOC) standard plans for highway slab bridge sections are analyzed and compared with optimum design section, according to the current requirement. The following observations are made; 1. In using material, The op...

      The revised Ministry of Construction (MOC) standard plans for highway slab bridge sections are analyzed and compared with optimum design section, according to the current requirement.
      The following observations are made;
      1. In using material, The optimum design section is showed more economical than the MOC standard section.
      2. The MOC standard plans does not utilize fully the capabilities of materials, of exceeds the allowable values.
      e.q.: Working stress of steel and concrete show significant amount of allowance(13 to 15% in the span 8 and 10m, while in the span 10m and 12m, the steel show 5 to 6%, and the concrete shows 1% to 4% exceedingly in comparison with the allowable values.)
      3. The distributor bars of the MOC standard plans are used ver 31 to 213% and contain some obvious discrepancies in details.
      e.q.: Distributor bars are either over under placed, and main reinforcements are placed inside the distributors to reduce the effective depths of the given sections.
      This indicates that the MOC standard plans are far from optimal and have plenty room to improve under the provailing design conditions.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼