한국사회 청년층의 중심상담연결망: 2002년과 2011년 비교 분석 = Core Discussion Networks of Korean Youths: A Comparative Analysis of 2002 and 2011

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Discussion network consists of social ties to others with whom people talk over important matters in everyday life in times of trouble. With data from national surveys conducted in 2002 and 2011, the current study examines the composition and structure of core discussion networks of Korean adults aged 30s or younger and their determinants and then cluster-analyze the 2011 core discussion networks. First, family/kin members and schoolmates/alumni have been consistently the most significant others, with neighbors and acquaintances from various social activities less important over the last ten years. The core composition varies according to socio-demographic factors, but it has rarely changed over time. It is most seriously affected by marital status, and the relative importance of marital status and whether to have a job has become greater. Second, discussion networks are considerably closed with strong ties between ego and alters, with a marked tendency of homophily by sex, age, and education. The proportion of family/kin has had the highest leverage on network properties, followed by: sex on network density; marital status on the kin proportion and age heterophily; employment status on tie duration; and four-year university degree on network size, contact frequency, and educational heterophily. Lastly, the core discussion networks are distinguishable into a kin-centered cluster and three non-kin based ones. What type of personal community networks to belong to is significantly affected not only by sex and marital status and also by employment status, four-year university degree, subjective identification of social strata, and the perception of residential area. Overall, there will be likely in the near future growing diversification and stratification of psychological and social support networks of young Korean adults due to social and economic issues critical for them hard to be solved.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재혁, "한국인의 사회 연결망과 연고주의" 15 : 117-141, 2000

2 鄭在杞, "한국인의 개인적 연줄망에 대한 경험적 연구 : 사회적 자본개념을 바탕으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1997

3 한국일보, "한국인 47%만 “행복하다”... 조사 4개국 중 꼴찌. 2016. 01. 18"

4 김영범, "한국노인의 가족관계망과 삶의 만족도: 서울 지역 노인을 중심으로" 한국노년학회 24 (24): 169-185, 2004

5 박경숙, "한국 노인의 사회적 관계: 가족과 지역사회와의 연계 정도" 34 : 621-647, 2000

6 한겨레21, "포기, 실패, 불신: 빈곤 청년에 드리운 스산한 마음의 풍경. 2015. 08. 25"

7 김태형, "청춘 심리 상담" 다시봄 2016

8 이순미, "청년기 연장의 젠더 차이와 가족 유대의 재구성" 비판사회학회 2016

9 후루이치 노리토시, "절망의 나라의 행복한 젊은이들" 민음사 2014

10 오인근, "여성노인의 사회적 관계망이 우울에 미치는 영향 연구-건강증진행위의 매개효과를 중심으로-" 한국아동가족복지학회 14 (14): 113-136, 2009

11 김선기, "세대연구를 다시 생각한다 : 세대주의적 경향에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국문화사회학회 17 : 207-248, 2014

12 박재흥, "세대명칭과 세대갈등 담론에 대한 비판적 검토" 비판사회학회 (81) : 10-34, 2009

13 한경혜, "세대간 사회적 지원의 교환과 노인의 심리적 복지" 12 (12): 55-80, 2000

14 김홍중, "서바이벌, 생존주의, 그리고 청년 세대:마음의 사회학의 관점에서" 한국사회학회 49 (49): 179-212, 2015

15 박바름, "삼자관계와 사회적 고립이 준법의식과 뇌물공여 행위에 미치는 영향" 한국사회학회 45 (45): 176-202, 2011

16 김재우, "사회적 지지와 연결망 배태: 자아연결망 다층분석의 활용" 한국사회학회 49 (49): 43-76, 2015

17 최정아, "도시노인의 사회적 지원망에 관한 연구" 12 (12): 65-78, 1992

18 매일경제, "대한민국 30대 보고서" 2016

19 엄기호, "단속사회" 창작과 비평 2014

20 이영자, "단독가구 노인의 스트레스와 우울감: 사회적 지지의 완충효과를 중심으로" 19 (19): 79-93, 1999

21 배진희, "농촌지역 노인의 사회적 지지와 생활만족도 : 자녀와 이웃지원의 기능적 측면을 중심으로" 한국사회복지정책학회 (20) : 197-216, 2004

22 박미진, "노인의 우울과 지지네트워크가 삶의 만족감에 미치는 영향 - 빈곤노인과 비빈곤노인의 비교" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 40 (40): 207-233, 2012

23 이미숙, "노년기 사회경제적 불평등의 다차원적 구조 분석" 한국보건사회연구원 209-252, 2008

24 정경희, "노년기 사회경제적 불평등의 다차원적 구조 분석" 한국보건사회연구원 176-208, 2008

25 경향신문, "과부하 걸린 한국의 가족. 2011. 05. 18"

26 김안나, "가족과 사회연결망 : 독일과 한국의 개인관계에 대한 비교연구" 한국사회학회 37 (37): 67-99, 2003

27 주간동아, "“사람이 그리워” 청년, 고독을 말하다. 2016. 09. 14"

28 최종렬, "‘복학왕’의 사회학: 지방대생의 이야기에 대한 서사 분석" 한국사회학회 2016

29 Helliwell, J. F., "World Happiness Report 2016" Sustainable Development Solutions Network 2016

30 Wenger, G. C., "Using network variation in practice: Identification of support network type" 10 (10): 28-35, 2002

31 Litwin, H., "The social networks of elderly immigrants: An analytic typology" 9 (9): 155-174, 1995

32 Suh, M. K., "The elderly population in Korea: their health status and kin-based social support" 21 (21): 175-196, 1992

33 Ruan, D., "The content of the General Social Survey discussion networks: an exploration of General Social Survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context" 20 (20): 247-264, 1998

34 Hamilton, M. J., "The complex structure of hunter–gatherer social networks" 274 (274): 2195-2203, 2007

35 Wellman, B., "The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers" 84 : 1201-1231, 1979

36 van Groenou, M. B., "The Social Networks of Older People: A Cross-National Analysis" Praeger 163-182, 1996

37 Auslander, G., "The Social Networks of Older People: A Cross-National Analysis" Praeger 183-203, 1996

38 Stone, L., "The Social Networks of Older People: A Cross-National Analysis" Praeger 77-97, 1996

39 Moore, G., "Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks" 55 (55): 726-735, 1990

40 Yee, J., "Social networks of Koreans" 40 (40): 325-352, 2000

41 Fiori, K. L., "Social network typologies and mental health among older adults" 61 (61): P25-P32, 2006

42 McPherson, M., "Social isolation in America:Changes in core discussion networks over two decades" 71 : 353-375, 2006

43 Mollenhorst, G., "Social contexts and core discussion networks:Using a choice approach to study similarity in intimate relationships" 86 (86): 937-965, 2008

44 Vaux, A., "Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention" Praeger 1988

45 Lin, N., "Social Support, Life Events, and Depression" Academic 17-30, 1986

46 Wills, T. A., "Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists" Oxford University Press 86-135, 2000

47 Scott, J., "Social Network Analysis: A Handbook" Sage Publications 2000

48 Brashears, M. E., "Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of American discussion networks" 33 (33): 331-341, 2011

49 van Tubergen, F., "Size and socio-economic resources of core discussion networks in the Netherlands: differences by national-origin group and immigrant generation" 37 (37): 1020-1042, 2014

50 White, M. J., "Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution" 52 (52): 198-221, 1986

51 Ransom, M. R., "Sampling distributions of segregation indexes" 28 (28): 454-475, 2000

52 Zhu, X., "Pathways to happiness: From personality to social networks and perceived support" 35 (35): 382-393, 2013

53 Otani, S., "Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities" Westview Press 279-298, 1999

54 Wellman, B., "Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities" Westview Press 49-82, 1999

55 Burt, R. S., "Network items and the general social survey" 6 (6): 293-339, 1984

56 Dunbar, R. I., "Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates" 22 (22): 469-493, 1992

57 Cohen, S., "Issues in the study and application of social support" 3 : 3-22, 1985

58 Wooldridge, J. M., "Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach" South-Western Cengage Learning 2009

59 OECD, "How's Life? 2015: Measuring Well-being" OECD Publishing

60 Kalmijn, M., "Homogeneity of social networks by age and marital status: A multilevel analysis of ego-centered networks" 29 (29): 25-43, 2007

61 Marsden, P. V., "Homogeneity in confiding relations" 10 (10): 57-76, 1988

62 Perry, B. L., "Functional specificity in discussion networks: the influence of general and problem-specific networks on health outcomes" 32 (32): 345-357, 2010

63 Sung, K. T., "Family-centered informal support networks of Korean elderly: The resistance of cultural traditions" 6 (6): 431-447, 1991

64 Barrera Jr, M., "Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models" 14 (14): 413-445, 1986

65 Zhou, W. X., "Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes" 272 (272): 439-444, 2005

66 Wellman, B., "Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support" 95 : 558-588, 1990

67 Marsden, P. V., "Core discussion networks of Americans" 52 : 122-131, 1987

68 Boase, J., "Core discussion networks in Japan and America" 38 (38): 95-119, 2012

69 Binder, J. F., "Closeness, loneliness, support: Core ties and significant ties in personal communities" 34 (34): 206-214, 2012

70 Lin, N., "Building a network theory of social capital" 22 (22): 28-51, 1999

71 OECD, "Better Life Index 2015. OECD Social and Welfare Statistics (database)"

72 Micklewright, J., "Analyzing Social and Political Change: A Casebook of Methods" Sage publications 78-97, 1994

73 Borgatti, S. P., "Analyzing Social Networks" Sage Publications 2013

74 Wenger, G. C., "A network typology: From theory to practice" 5 (5): 147-162, 1991

75 Duncan, O. D., "A methodological analysis of segregation indexes" 20 (20): 210-217, 1955

76 Sarstedt, M., "A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics" Springer 2011

77 오마이뉴스, "20대는 오포세대인가, 과연 정말?. 2015. 02. 16"

78 한겨레신문, "2030세대 58% “나도 오포세대!”. 2015. 03. 03"