RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 학습자의 발화에 대한 한국어 교사와 비교사 원어민 간의 평가 차이 연구 = An investigation of the differences between novice teachers, experienced teachers and non-teacher native speakers in evaluation of Korean language learners’ speech.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104191027

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aim is to investigate the scoring patterns in speaking test evaluation amongst novice teachers, experienced teachers and non-teacher natives and to know to what extent they are different from each other. To this end, ten novice teachers, ten experienced teachers and ten non-teacher natives scored twenty examinee’s responses to a semi-direct speaking test consisting of three tasks using a six-point Likert scale for accuracy (segmental; suprasegmental), fluency(speech rate; pause), vocabulary, grammar, content, consistency/conjunction, comprehensibility, and intelligibility. The analysis of raters’ scores through a multi-facet Rasch measurement model showed distinctive variability between the rating patterns of three groups. Novice teachers scored the most strictly, while the non-teachers scored the most leniently. Furthermore the analysis displayed different rating patterns amongst the three groups on the scoring criteria, the task type and the leaners’ Korean language ability. Such findings are expected to contribute not only to a better understanding of the raters’ scoring processes and to the development of a more valid speaking assessment, but also getting more information which part of speech we have to focus on in teaching speaking. (George Mason University, Korea)
    번역하기

    This study aim is to investigate the scoring patterns in speaking test evaluation amongst novice teachers, experienced teachers and non-teacher natives and to know to what extent they are different from each other. To this end, ten novice teachers, te...

    This study aim is to investigate the scoring patterns in speaking test evaluation amongst novice teachers, experienced teachers and non-teacher natives and to know to what extent they are different from each other. To this end, ten novice teachers, ten experienced teachers and ten non-teacher natives scored twenty examinee’s responses to a semi-direct speaking test consisting of three tasks using a six-point Likert scale for accuracy (segmental; suprasegmental), fluency(speech rate; pause), vocabulary, grammar, content, consistency/conjunction, comprehensibility, and intelligibility. The analysis of raters’ scores through a multi-facet Rasch measurement model showed distinctive variability between the rating patterns of three groups. Novice teachers scored the most strictly, while the non-teachers scored the most leniently. Furthermore the analysis displayed different rating patterns amongst the three groups on the scoring criteria, the task type and the leaners’ Korean language ability. Such findings are expected to contribute not only to a better understanding of the raters’ scoring processes and to the development of a more valid speaking assessment, but also getting more information which part of speech we have to focus on in teaching speaking. (George Mason University, Korea)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이향, "한국어 말하기 평가의 발음 영역 채점에서의 채점자 특성에 따른 채점 경향 연구 -한국어 교육 경험과 전공을 중심으로-" 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당 39 : 213-245, 2013

    2 강석한, "외국인 한국어 말하기 시험의 평가자 요소가 채점에 미치는 영향" 이중언어학회 (55) : 1-29, 2014

    3 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 개발" 국립국어원 2010

    4 Lynch, B. K, "Using G-theory and many-facet Rasch Measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants" 15 : 158-180, 1998

    5 Bambose, A., "Torn between norms: innovations in world English" 17 (17): 1-14, 1998

    6 Clark, L. D., "The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research" Indiana University 8-15, 1987

    7 Frith, J. R., "Testing the FSI testing kit" 11 : 12-14, 1979

    8 Walker, R., "Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca" Oxford University Press 2010

    9 Hadden, B. L., "Teacher and Nonteacher Perception of second language Communication" 41 (41): 1-24, 1991

    10 Shohamy, E., "Rater reliability of the oral interview speaking test" 16 : 219-222, 1983

    1 이향, "한국어 말하기 평가의 발음 영역 채점에서의 채점자 특성에 따른 채점 경향 연구 -한국어 교육 경험과 전공을 중심으로-" 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당 39 : 213-245, 2013

    2 강석한, "외국인 한국어 말하기 시험의 평가자 요소가 채점에 미치는 영향" 이중언어학회 (55) : 1-29, 2014

    3 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 개발" 국립국어원 2010

    4 Lynch, B. K, "Using G-theory and many-facet Rasch Measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants" 15 : 158-180, 1998

    5 Bambose, A., "Torn between norms: innovations in world English" 17 (17): 1-14, 1998

    6 Clark, L. D., "The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research" Indiana University 8-15, 1987

    7 Frith, J. R., "Testing the FSI testing kit" 11 : 12-14, 1979

    8 Walker, R., "Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca" Oxford University Press 2010

    9 Hadden, B. L., "Teacher and Nonteacher Perception of second language Communication" 41 (41): 1-24, 1991

    10 Shohamy, E., "Rater reliability of the oral interview speaking test" 16 : 219-222, 1983

    11 Schaefer, E., "Rater bias patterns in an EFL Writing assessment" 25 : 465-493, 2008

    12 Byrnes, H., "Proficiency: concepts and developments" 18 : 9-10, 1986

    13 Bachman, L., "Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview" 10 : 149-163, 1988

    14 Galloway, V., "Perceptions of the Communicative Efforts of American Students of Spanish" 64 : 429-433, 1980

    15 Henning, G., "Oral proficiency testing: comparative validities of interview, imitation, and completion models" 33 : 315-332, 1983

    16 Ludwig, J., "Native-Speaker Judgments of Second-Language Learners’ Efforts at Communication: A Review" 66 (66): 274-283, 1982

    17 Chastain, K., "Native Speaker Reaction to Instructor-Identified Student Second-Language Errors" 64 : 210-215, 1980

    18 Chastain, K., "Native Speaker Evaluation of Student Composition Errors" 65 : 288-294, 1981

    19 Barnwell, D., "Naive’ native speakers and judgements of oral proficiency in Spanish" 6 : 152-163, 1989

    20 McNamara, T. F., "Measuring second Language Performance" Longman 1996

    21 Nichols, J., "Language study, international study, and education, Profession 88 (MLA)"

    22 Smith, L. E., "International intelligibility of English: directions and resources" 4 (4): 333-342, 1985

    23 Olsson, M., "Intelligibility: A Study of Errors and Their Importance"

    24 Piazza, L. G., "French Tolerance for Grammatical Errors Made by Americans" 64 : 422-427, 1980

    25 Ensz, K., "French Attitudes toward Typical Speech Errors of American Speakers of French" 66 : 133-139, 1982

    26 Cumming, A., "Expertise in evaluating second language compositions" 7 : 31-51, 1990

    27 Eckes, T., "Examing rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-facet Rasch analysis" 2 : 197-221, 2005

    28 Politzer, R. L., "Errors of English Speakers of German as Perceived and Evaluated by German natives" 62 : 253-261, 1978

    29 Politzer, R. L., "Errors of English Speakers of German as Perceived and Evaluated by German Natives" 62 : 257-, 1982

    30 Carey, M. D., "Does a rater familiarity with a candidate’s Pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interview?" 28 (28): 201-219, 2011

    31 Council of Europe, "Common Europe framework of reference for language: Learning, teaching, assessment" Cambridge university Press 2001

    32 Wolfe, E. W., "Cognitive differences in Proficient and Nonproficient Essay Scores" 15 (15): 465-492, 1998

    33 김현정, "An investigation of novice, developing, and experienced raters’ rating patterns on a second language speaking assessment." 한국응용언어학회 26 (26): 151-182, 2010

    34 Guntermann, G., "A Study of the Frequency and Communicative Effects of Errors in Spanish" 62 : 251-, 1978

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-10-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국어 교육 -> 한국어교육 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 1.03 1.37 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼