RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털사회에서의 언론자유의 가치의 정립

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76189068

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the digital society, the principle of law in the freedom of speech is construed as two opposite ways. One argues that internet, a new digital technology, depends on the free market of thought. The other argues that we must establish a theory of the new freedom of press in tandem with developing internet, and that we must make a law of cyber press.
    Now, the point of judicial precedent in the US Supreme Court shows that internet, which compared with the press or broadcasting, has different properties, depends on the free market of thought. Internet is overlapped with the freedom of press and the freedom of communication. It is very difficult to solve this overlapping problem with respect to existing laws of press. Especially the conflict between the freedom of press and the freedom of communication takes place in this case. Since the freedom of press is superior to that of communication, we must deal with this conflict in terms of defending the freedom of press.
    Peculiarities in digital society appear in disharmony of pro-function and anti-function with respect to digital technology, and the settlement to this disharmony could be regarded as the paradigm of value theory of the new freedom of press. But there are a lot of actual barriers to obstruct the settlement. Due to national, cultural, political and social differences, We cannot make a standard. The municipal law is not helpful to get rid of this obstacle. In contrast, it is possible to solve this problem by establishing the value theory of new cyber press law system in terms of international cooperation and correspondence.
    번역하기

    In the digital society, the principle of law in the freedom of speech is construed as two opposite ways. One argues that internet, a new digital technology, depends on the free market of thought. The other argues that we must establish a theory of the...

    In the digital society, the principle of law in the freedom of speech is construed as two opposite ways. One argues that internet, a new digital technology, depends on the free market of thought. The other argues that we must establish a theory of the new freedom of press in tandem with developing internet, and that we must make a law of cyber press.
    Now, the point of judicial precedent in the US Supreme Court shows that internet, which compared with the press or broadcasting, has different properties, depends on the free market of thought. Internet is overlapped with the freedom of press and the freedom of communication. It is very difficult to solve this overlapping problem with respect to existing laws of press. Especially the conflict between the freedom of press and the freedom of communication takes place in this case. Since the freedom of press is superior to that of communication, we must deal with this conflict in terms of defending the freedom of press.
    Peculiarities in digital society appear in disharmony of pro-function and anti-function with respect to digital technology, and the settlement to this disharmony could be regarded as the paradigm of value theory of the new freedom of press. But there are a lot of actual barriers to obstruct the settlement. Due to national, cultural, political and social differences, We cannot make a standard. The municipal law is not helpful to get rid of this obstacle. In contrast, it is possible to solve this problem by establishing the value theory of new cyber press law system in terms of international cooperation and correspondence.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 도전받는 언론자유의 법체계
    • Ⅲ. 디지털사회에서의 언론자유의 가치 패러다임
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 〈SUMMARY〉
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 도전받는 언론자유의 법체계
    • Ⅲ. 디지털사회에서의 언론자유의 가치 패러다임
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 〈SUMMARY〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.07 1.07 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.08 1.07 1.097 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼