검사작성 피의자신문 영상녹화물에 대한 비판적 검토 = A Critical Study on Video Recording of Suspect's Statement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The amendment of Article 312 of Criminal Procedure Act proposed by the Presidential Committee on Judicial Reform and the Legislation and Judiciary Committee of the Korean National Assembly contains the limitation on the admissibility of interrogatory, on par with the previous Supreme Court finding. It also eliminates that admissibility of the video recording of interrogation as prosecutory evidence or impeachment. Yet, the Act contains some elements that contradict the purport of amendment. It allows that video recording can be used to prove interrogatory’s substantial authenticity. The failure to prescribe the presence of defense counsel under reliable condition while videotaping interrogation is another setback. That the prosecutory authorities still can videotape interrogation with notice to the suspect and without his or her approval is also subject to controversy.
The intent of videotaping interrogation is to protect the rights of the suspect, so it should be 1) allowed only with the suspect’s approval, or 2) if it is allowed with notice only, then it should be stopped as soon as the suspect refuses to be videotaped or 3) when the suspect requests withdrawal or exerts the right of deniability. The bill could be complemented with such stipulations as 4) a specification of the cases in which interrogation can be videotaped, 5) a rule that the entire interrogation should be taped, not a targeted moment or period of time, and 6) videotaping being granted at the request of the suspect or defense counsel.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 형사소송법 제244조의2 제1항에 대한 검토 및 관련문제
• Ⅲ. 형사소송법 제312조 제2항과 제318조의2 제2항에 대한 검토 및 관련문제
• Ⅳ. 결 론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이완규, "형사소송법의 쟁점" 탐구사 152-, 2007

2 류지영, "형사소송법 제312조의 영상녹화물의 증거능력" 중앙법학회 10 (10): 115-136, 2008

3 김현숙, "피의자신문조서와 영상녹화물의 증거능력에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2008

4 나영민, "피의자신문제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 59-, 2006

5 오기두, "영상녹화물의 증거능력 및 증거조사방법" 사법제도개혁추진위원회 28-29, 2005

6 안성수, "영상녹화물의 녹화 및 증거 사용방법" 법학연구소 10 (10): 33-51, 2007

7 이동희, "사개추위안의 피의자신문 녹음· 녹화제도 도입방안에 대한 검토" 한국비교형사법학회 8 (8): 501-534, 2006

8 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 조서와 영상녹화물" 한국비교형사법학회 9 (9): 143-196, 2007

9 D.C. CODE ANN, "§ 5-133.20(2004): holding police must record entire interrogation in dangerous, violent crimes"

10 G.D. Lassiter, "Videotaped Confessions: Panacea or Pandora's Box?" 28 (28): 192-, 2006

11 "TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 38.22(2001): Providing Texas Rules of Evidence require recording of interrogation"

12 "ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 25, § 2803-B(2004): requiring videotaping when suspect questioned at police facility"

13 "ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/103-2.1(2003): indicating custodial interrogation in homicide and sexual offense cases not admissible unless recorded"