RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      대장암에서 폐색이 예후에 미치는 영향 = The Prognostic Impact of Obstructed Colorectal Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104788699

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a
      poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This
      study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction
      on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December
      1999 to December 2005, patients undergoing single stage
      operation for OB were examined prospectively. OB (n=
      193) was compared with a NOB (n=444) used in a
      primary tumor resection during the same period. 637
      colorectal cancers were examined in this study. Results:
      The overall operative mortality was 21 (3.3%) and the
      postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the OB
      (OB: 16, 8.3%) group than in the NOB (NOB: 5, 1.1%)
      group. The proportion of OB was higher in the left-colon
      (52.8%) than in the right colon (16.0%) and rectum
      (31.1%, P<0.001). However, OB was associated with
      an older age (P=0.013). The proportion of advanced
      tumor stage was higher in OB (II: 35.8%, III: 39.5%, IV:
      24.7%) than in NOB (II: 53.2%, III: 35.8%, IV: 11.0%,
      P<0.001). The 5-year cancer-related survival for OB was
      worse than NOB (OB: 77.3%, NOB: 57.8%, P<0.05).
      However, in the cases of a colorectal cancer performed
      curative resection (stage II and III), the survival for OB
      was not worse than NOB: stage II (OB: 82.8%, NOB:
      92.2%, P=0.24), stage III (OB: 65.2%, NOB: 56.9%,
      P=0.43). Conclusions: OB has older and more advanced
      disease characteristics. However, if an oncologically
      curative resection is performed, the survival for OB is
      similar to that of a NOB.
      번역하기

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December 1999 to December 2005, patients und...

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a
      poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This
      study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction
      on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December
      1999 to December 2005, patients undergoing single stage
      operation for OB were examined prospectively. OB (n=
      193) was compared with a NOB (n=444) used in a
      primary tumor resection during the same period. 637
      colorectal cancers were examined in this study. Results:
      The overall operative mortality was 21 (3.3%) and the
      postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the OB
      (OB: 16, 8.3%) group than in the NOB (NOB: 5, 1.1%)
      group. The proportion of OB was higher in the left-colon
      (52.8%) than in the right colon (16.0%) and rectum
      (31.1%, P<0.001). However, OB was associated with
      an older age (P=0.013). The proportion of advanced
      tumor stage was higher in OB (II: 35.8%, III: 39.5%, IV:
      24.7%) than in NOB (II: 53.2%, III: 35.8%, IV: 11.0%,
      P<0.001). The 5-year cancer-related survival for OB was
      worse than NOB (OB: 77.3%, NOB: 57.8%, P<0.05).
      However, in the cases of a colorectal cancer performed
      curative resection (stage II and III), the survival for OB
      was not worse than NOB: stage II (OB: 82.8%, NOB:
      92.2%, P=0.24), stage III (OB: 65.2%, NOB: 56.9%,
      P=0.43). Conclusions: OB has older and more advanced
      disease characteristics. However, if an oncologically
      curative resection is performed, the survival for OB is
      similar to that of a NOB.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a
      poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This
      study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction
      on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December
      1999 to December 2005, patients undergoing single stage
      operation for OB were examined prospectively. OB (n=
      193) was compared with a NOB (n=444) used in a
      primary tumor resection during the same period. 637
      colorectal cancers were examined in this study. Results:
      The overall operative mortality was 21 (3.3%) and the
      postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the OB
      (OB: 16, 8.3%) group than in the NOB (NOB: 5, 1.1%)
      group. The proportion of OB was higher in the left-colon
      (52.8%) than in the right colon (16.0%) and rectum
      (31.1%, P<0.001). However, OB was associated with
      an older age (P=0.013). The proportion of advanced
      tumor stage was higher in OB (II: 35.8%, III: 39.5%, IV:
      24.7%) than in NOB (II: 53.2%, III: 35.8%, IV: 11.0%,
      P<0.001). The 5-year cancer-related survival for OB was
      worse than NOB (OB: 77.3%, NOB: 57.8%, P<0.05).
      However, in the cases of a colorectal cancer performed
      curative resection (stage II and III), the survival for OB
      was not worse than NOB: stage II (OB: 82.8%, NOB:
      92.2%, P=0.24), stage III (OB: 65.2%, NOB: 56.9%,
      P=0.43). Conclusions: OB has older and more advanced
      disease characteristics. However, if an oncologically
      curative resection is performed, the survival for OB is
      similar to that of a NOB.
      번역하기

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December 1999 to December 2005, patients undergo...

      Purpose: An obstructed colorectal cancer (OB) has a
      poorer survival than a non-obstructed cancer (NOB). This
      study examined the prognostic impact of bowel obstruction
      on colorectal cancer. Methods: From December
      1999 to December 2005, patients undergoing single stage
      operation for OB were examined prospectively. OB (n=
      193) was compared with a NOB (n=444) used in a
      primary tumor resection during the same period. 637
      colorectal cancers were examined in this study. Results:
      The overall operative mortality was 21 (3.3%) and the
      postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the OB
      (OB: 16, 8.3%) group than in the NOB (NOB: 5, 1.1%)
      group. The proportion of OB was higher in the left-colon
      (52.8%) than in the right colon (16.0%) and rectum
      (31.1%, P<0.001). However, OB was associated with
      an older age (P=0.013). The proportion of advanced
      tumor stage was higher in OB (II: 35.8%, III: 39.5%, IV:
      24.7%) than in NOB (II: 53.2%, III: 35.8%, IV: 11.0%,
      P<0.001). The 5-year cancer-related survival for OB was
      worse than NOB (OB: 77.3%, NOB: 57.8%, P<0.05).
      However, in the cases of a colorectal cancer performed
      curative resection (stage II and III), the survival for OB
      was not worse than NOB: stage II (OB: 82.8%, NOB:
      92.2%, P=0.24), stage III (OB: 65.2%, NOB: 56.9%,
      P=0.43). Conclusions: OB has older and more advanced
      disease characteristics. However, if an oncologically
      curative resection is performed, the survival for OB is
      similar to that of a NOB.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Stower MJ, "The results of 1115 patients with colorectal cancer treated over an 8-year period in a single hospital" 11 : 119-123, 1985

      2 Wolmark N, "The prognostic significance of tumor location and bowel obstruction in Dukes B and C colorectal cancer. Findings from the NSABP clinical trials" 198 : 743-752, 1983

      3 McArdle CS, "The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer" 93 : 483-488, 2006

      4 Villar JM, "Surgical options for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction" 35 : 275-281, 2005

      5 Single-stage treatment for malignant lef, "Subtotal Colectomy versus On-table Irrigation and Anastomosis" The SCOTIA Study Group 82 : 1622-1627, 1995

      6 Steinberg SM, "Stablein DM. Prognostic indicators of colon tumors. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group experience" 57 : 1866-1870, 1986

      7 Park UC, "Single-stage procedure with intraoperative colonoscopy and colonic irrigation in patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer" 19 : 487-492, 2004

      8 Watt AM, "Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review" 246 : 24-30, 2007

      9 Deen KI, "Rothenberger DA. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: the University of Minnesota experience" 187 : 573-576, 1998

      10 Scott NA, "Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer" 82 : 321-323, 1995

      1 Stower MJ, "The results of 1115 patients with colorectal cancer treated over an 8-year period in a single hospital" 11 : 119-123, 1985

      2 Wolmark N, "The prognostic significance of tumor location and bowel obstruction in Dukes B and C colorectal cancer. Findings from the NSABP clinical trials" 198 : 743-752, 1983

      3 McArdle CS, "The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer" 93 : 483-488, 2006

      4 Villar JM, "Surgical options for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction" 35 : 275-281, 2005

      5 Single-stage treatment for malignant lef, "Subtotal Colectomy versus On-table Irrigation and Anastomosis" The SCOTIA Study Group 82 : 1622-1627, 1995

      6 Steinberg SM, "Stablein DM. Prognostic indicators of colon tumors. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group experience" 57 : 1866-1870, 1986

      7 Park UC, "Single-stage procedure with intraoperative colonoscopy and colonic irrigation in patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer" 19 : 487-492, 2004

      8 Watt AM, "Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review" 246 : 24-30, 2007

      9 Deen KI, "Rothenberger DA. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: the University of Minnesota experience" 187 : 573-576, 1998

      10 Scott NA, "Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer" 82 : 321-323, 1995

      11 Chen HS, "Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends" 127 : 370-376, 2000

      12 Garcia-Valdecasas JC, "Obstructing colorectal carcinomas. Prospective study" 34 : 759-762, 1991

      13 Serpell JW, "Obstructing carcinomas of the colon" 76 : 965-969, 1989

      14 Borie F, "Management and prognosis of colon cancer in patients with intestinal obstruction or peritonitis: a French population-based study" 11 : 266-273, 2005

      15 Phillips RK, "Malignant large bowel obstruction" 72 : 296-302, 1985

      16 Biondo S, "Large bowel obstruction: predictive factors for postoperative mortality" 47 : 1889-1897, 2004

      17 Runkel NS, "Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine" 85 : 1260-1265, 1998

      18 Lee YM, "Emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancers: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions" 192 : 719-725, 2001

      19 Jestin P, "Emergency surgery for colonic cancer in a defined population" 92 : 94-100, 2005

      20 Papanicolaou G, "Effect of large-bowel obstruction on colonic blood flow. An experimental study" 32 : 673-679, 1989

      21 Kim JH, "Complete single-stage management of left colon cancer obstruction with a new device" 19 : 1381-1387, 2005

      22 Kim JH, "Complete single stage management of left colon cancer with a new devices" 18 : 30-36, 2002

      23 Kronborg O, "Acute obstruction in cancer of the colon and rectum" 18 : 22-27, 1975

      24 Biondo S, "A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer" 189 : 377-383, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-03-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-11-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.06 0.312 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼