RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      신불교운동의 현황과 종교적 한계 = The Rebirth of Buddhism in India and its Religious Limits - Focusing on the Neo-Buddhism Movement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108242998

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Buddhism in India once disappeared from India and revived in 1956 through Ambedkar's Neo-Buddhism Movement. This movement was for the liberation of Dalit. Currently, India's Buddhist population is estimated at 8.44 million, accounting for 0.7% of India's religious population. This figure is down from 0.74% of the 1961 Indian Census after 1956, and although there have been fluctuations in rise and fall since then, it has hardly increased and rather decreased. Although the influence of caste in India has not disappeared and discrimination against Dalits or human rights issues have not improved, the achievements of the Neo-Buddhism Movement have stopped.
      The purpose of this paper is to review the purpose and current status of the Neo-Buddhism Movement and to analyze the limitations of the New Buddhism from a religious perspective. To this end, first of all, the purpose and characteristics of the new Buddhism are examined. Ambedkar chose Buddhism instead of Hinduism and led the Neo-Buddhism Movement for Dalit, focusing on rationality and social equality.
      In addition, as a result of analyzing the current status of Neo-Buddhism Movement and articles related to conversion, it is found that the new Buddhism in India plays a limited role as a religion for Dalits. There is a lack of efforts by the Indian government and the state to recognize Buddhism as an institutional religion, and Hindutva hegemony inhibit the conversion of Dalits to nebulism. In this situation, for Dalit, the meaning of Buddhist conversion is only an alternative religion of Hinduism and does not work as a religion itself.
      Such religious limitations are analyzed in two ways: the doctrinal level and the religious level. On the doctrinal level, the Neo-Buddhism is based on Ambedkar's understanding of Buddhism. The aspect of pain and the problem of liberation were excluded while practicing discipline, wisdom, and mercy for the purpose of equality and emphasizing morality. At the religious level, Neo-Buddhism is not much different from Hinduism in terms of custom and worship. This limitation of Neo-Buddhism prevented the Buddhism from acting as a personal religion.
      번역하기

      Buddhism in India once disappeared from India and revived in 1956 through Ambedkar's Neo-Buddhism Movement. This movement was for the liberation of Dalit. Currently, India's Buddhist population is estimated at 8.44 million, accounting for 0.7% of Indi...

      Buddhism in India once disappeared from India and revived in 1956 through Ambedkar's Neo-Buddhism Movement. This movement was for the liberation of Dalit. Currently, India's Buddhist population is estimated at 8.44 million, accounting for 0.7% of India's religious population. This figure is down from 0.74% of the 1961 Indian Census after 1956, and although there have been fluctuations in rise and fall since then, it has hardly increased and rather decreased. Although the influence of caste in India has not disappeared and discrimination against Dalits or human rights issues have not improved, the achievements of the Neo-Buddhism Movement have stopped.
      The purpose of this paper is to review the purpose and current status of the Neo-Buddhism Movement and to analyze the limitations of the New Buddhism from a religious perspective. To this end, first of all, the purpose and characteristics of the new Buddhism are examined. Ambedkar chose Buddhism instead of Hinduism and led the Neo-Buddhism Movement for Dalit, focusing on rationality and social equality.
      In addition, as a result of analyzing the current status of Neo-Buddhism Movement and articles related to conversion, it is found that the new Buddhism in India plays a limited role as a religion for Dalits. There is a lack of efforts by the Indian government and the state to recognize Buddhism as an institutional religion, and Hindutva hegemony inhibit the conversion of Dalits to nebulism. In this situation, for Dalit, the meaning of Buddhist conversion is only an alternative religion of Hinduism and does not work as a religion itself.
      Such religious limitations are analyzed in two ways: the doctrinal level and the religious level. On the doctrinal level, the Neo-Buddhism is based on Ambedkar's understanding of Buddhism. The aspect of pain and the problem of liberation were excluded while practicing discipline, wisdom, and mercy for the purpose of equality and emphasizing morality. At the religious level, Neo-Buddhism is not much different from Hinduism in terms of custom and worship. This limitation of Neo-Buddhism prevented the Buddhism from acting as a personal religion.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박경준, "현대 아시아의 참여불교 운동 고찰" (가을) : 2000

      2 이명권, "암베드카의 불교관" 한국종교학회 26 : 175-196, 2002

      3 이명권, "암베드카르와 현대 인도 불교" 한국학술정보 2012

      4 우명주, "암베드까르의 사성제 해석과 그 배경" 동국대학교 불교사회문화연구원 18 : 2018

      5 박경준, "빔라오 람지 암베드까르(B.R. Ambedkar)의불교관 고찰- 『붓다와 그의 가르침(The Buddha and His Dhamma)』을 중심으로 -" 불교문화연구원 (78) : 199-227, 2017

      6 "마등가경"

      7 "대정신수대장경"

      8 "대장엄경론"

      9 山崎元一, "印度社會와 新佛敎運動" 한길사 1983

      10 志賀浄邦, "インド仏教復興運動の軌跡とその現況" 25 : 23-46, 2010

      1 박경준, "현대 아시아의 참여불교 운동 고찰" (가을) : 2000

      2 이명권, "암베드카의 불교관" 한국종교학회 26 : 175-196, 2002

      3 이명권, "암베드카르와 현대 인도 불교" 한국학술정보 2012

      4 우명주, "암베드까르의 사성제 해석과 그 배경" 동국대학교 불교사회문화연구원 18 : 2018

      5 박경준, "빔라오 람지 암베드까르(B.R. Ambedkar)의불교관 고찰- 『붓다와 그의 가르침(The Buddha and His Dhamma)』을 중심으로 -" 불교문화연구원 (78) : 199-227, 2017

      6 "마등가경"

      7 "대정신수대장경"

      8 "대장엄경론"

      9 山崎元一, "印度社會와 新佛敎運動" 한길사 1983

      10 志賀浄邦, "インド仏教復興運動の軌跡とその現況" 25 : 23-46, 2010

      11 Daniyal, Shoaib, "What does Mayawati’s threat to convert mean for Dalit politics in India?"

      12 Ambedkar, B.R, "The Buddha and His Dhamma, Education Department. Dr. Babasheb Ambedkar, writings and speeches. Vol. 11" Government of Maharashtra 1980

      13 Verma, Vidhu, "Reinterpreting Buddhism : Ambedkar on the Politics of Social Action" XLV (XLV): 2010

      14 Viswanathan, Nirupama, "Neo Buddhist dalits in Tamil Nadu struggle for community certificates"

      15 Bhārtī, K, "Marx in Ambedkar's thinking" Forward Press

      16 Sponberg, Alan, "Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia" State University of New York Press 1996

      17 Kadam, K. N., "Dr. Ambedkar, Buddhism and Social Change" Buddhist World Press 2010

      18 Moudgil, Manu, "Dalits Are Still Converting To Buddhism, But At A Dwindling Rate"

      19 Venugopal, Vasudha, "Buddhist, Ambedkarite bodies say UP law that penalises mass conversions is a move to quell Dalit resistance"

      20 Ahir, D. C., "Buddhism in modern India" Sri Satguru Publications 1991

      21 "Anguttara Nikāya, PTS"

      22 Rajan, K Mavali, "Ambedkar’s Thoughts on Dalits, Politics and Women Empowerment" Kaveri Books 2017

      23 Sangharakshita, "Ambedkar and Buddhism" Windhorse 1986

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-03-19 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Institute for uddhist Studies -> Korean Institute for Buddhist Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.61
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.59 0.55 1.569 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼