동북공정 이후 중국 학계의 한국사 연구동향 = [Criticism Treatise] Since Northeast Borderland History and the Chain of Events Research Project, a Tendency of Study about Korean History in the Chinese Academia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Series "Research Project(Northeast Borderland History and the Chain of Events Research Project = abbr. 'the Northeast Project')” sponsored and operated by Chinese history scholars, is completed in February 2007. This research pattern and style stirred up entanglements in historian circle and conflicts in national sentiment between Korea and China. Up to then, such situation had never happened in the history of Sino-Korean relationship. Fortunately, with the quickly action of Korean and Chinese governments, the conflicts were settled. Nevertheless, there are still researchers and institutes sponsored in that period of time. On the one hand, they keep on following up the research pattern and style as same as “the Northeast Project”; on the other hand, they showed their dissatisfaction at the policy of Chinese government who likely intended to control and change their research attitude. In order to respond to the research attitude in historian circle of China, “Koguryo Academic Financial Group”was set up in Korea to push forward this research. After Chinese high-level officials visited Korean Foreign Ministry, this group is renamed with “Northeast History Financial Group” and became a research institution concentrating on the historian education in East Asian.
Whatever, this situation brings about bad influence on regional harmony and community in East Asia. Therefore, Korea and China should work together to resolve the problems on the research pattern and style of “the Northeast Project”. Exactly to resolve this problems, this article first analyzes the research tendency of historian circle of China after “the Northeast Project” is finished, and eventually finds that historian circle of China is still carrying on their research from the same perspective. Based on this, this article proposes that historian researchers of China and Korea should work together with the moral attitude of respecting to the realities of each other’s history. Meanwhile, this article also proposes that we should take the research attitude of common history in EU region as reference. Only in this way, we can realize the regional harmony and community in East Asia.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "復旦學報(社會科學版)"

2 "스트래티지21" 동북아역사재단 (겨울) : 2006

3 "黑龍江史地" (220) : 2010

4 姜孟山, "高句麗史的歸屬問題" (3) : 1999

5 "長春師範學院學報(人文社會科學版)" 27 (27): 2008

6 "通化師範學院學報" 28 (28): 2007

7 陳尙勝, "近16年來中國學術界關于淸朝與朝鮮關係史硏究述評" (秋季) : 2009

8 魏國忠, "渤海國史" 中國社會科學出版社 2006

9 郁達夫, "沆論" 秦東書局 1921

10 鄭成宏, "檀君神話成事實" (11) : 2007

11 王志國, "檀君神話和弘益人間思想" (1) : 2005

12 孫進己, "東北民族史硏究(一)" 中州古籍出版社 1994

13 "東北史地" (2) : 2009

14 Christopher I. Beckwith, "日本·高句麗語系的民族和早期中國" BrillAcademic 2004

15 勵聲, "改革開放30年來中國邊疆史地硏究學科的繁榮與發展- 兼述中國邊疆史地硏究的 第三次硏究高潮" 18 (18): 2008

16 劉信君, "改革開放30年來中國邊疆史" (8) : 2008

17 "延邊大學學報(社會科學版)" 43 (43): 2010

18 "學報大連民族學院" (6) : 2007

19 "吉林省敎育學院學報" 25 (25): 2009

20 劉子敏, "古代高句麗同中原王朝的關係" (3) : 1996

21 "北方文物"

22 王景澤, "中國東北史硏究面任着理論考險" 9 (9): 2008

23 黃松筠, "2009年東北邊疆歷史與文化學術硏討會‘綜述’" 19 (19): 2009