市場歪曲行爲로부터의 消費者 保護 ― 消費者 被害에 대한 損害賠償責任을 中心으로 ― = The Liabilities for Tort on Consumer Welfare

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The issue on liabilities by infringing consumers welfare on tort law has important meaning in capitalism. So anti-competitive practice has been regulated by application of special statutes, such as antitrust law. But, these special statutes are insufficient to cover all the matters of anti-competitive practice. Rather, competitive injury should be fallen under the control of civil law. This study attempts to solve the problem on the liabilities on tort law, in particular, measuring the damages of consumers.
It is hard work that calculating the consumer damages by unfair competition. To solve that problem, courts have usually depended on “yardstick" or “before-and-after" method. The yardstick method calculates damages by comparing the price plaintiff paid to the prevailing price in some different but similar market in which anti-competitive practice at issue is not occurring. The before-and-after method compares the plaintiff's price to those prevailing in the same market prior to and subsequent to the violation period.
On the other hand, there is another tremendous difficulty in determining accurately indirect purchasers damages. The direct purchaser, however, may collect the entire amount of any overcharges, even if he/she has passed on some of the overcharges to downstream, so the indirect purchasers are required to prove the proportion of an overcharge passed on to them. This study suggests that some notes including Hovenkamp's insistence should be considered importantly in Korean civil law.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍천룡, "소비자피해구제론" 삼영사 1980

2 권오승, "소비자의 지위와 소비자문제 in : 법과 소비자보호" 삼영사 1981

3 이시윤, "민사소송법" 박영사 1999

4 이호영, "독점규제법의 이론과 실무" 홍문사 2006

5 홍춘의, "독점규제법위반행위와 손해배상책임" 전북대학교 법학연구소 21 : 1999

6 이기종, "독점규제법위반행위에 대한 공정거래위원회의 시정조치와 법원의 손해배상판결의 관계" 8 : 1997

7 양창수, "독점규제법에서의 손해배상" 5 : 1999

8 김영갑, "독점규제법상의 손해배상책임" 30 (30): 1997

9 F. 리트너, "독일경쟁법" 법문사 1997

10 이병준,독일 민법상의 소비자개념,민사법학,제26호, "독일 민법상의 소비자개념" (26) : 2004

11 김동훈, "공정거래법상의 손해배상청구" 7 : 1999

12 홍대식, "공정거래법상 손해배상청구-실무의 관점에서-" 한국경영법률학회 13 (13): 2003

13 권오승, "경제법" 법문사 2005

14 윤태영, "경쟁질서 위반행위에 대한 불법행위책임" 14 (14): 2007

15 "田村義之? 競?的利益? ジュリスト? 第1126?? 有斐閣? 1998"

16 大村郭志,消費者法, "消費者法" 有斐閣 2003

17 ?中俊雄, "民法綱要" 創文社 1989

18 大村郭志, "取引と公序(上), ジュリスト, 1023?, 1993"

19 山本敬三, "取引?係における公法的規律と私法の役割(1), ジュリスト, 1087?, 1996"

20 浦川道太郞, "不法行?法の新時代を語る? 法律時報? 78?8?? 日本評論社? 2006"

21 Lambert, Thomas A., "Tweaking Antitrust's Business Model, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 153. (2006)"

22 Hovenkamp, Herbert, "The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution" Harvard University Press 2005

23 Pollock, Earl E., "Standing to Sue, Remoteness of Injury, and the Passing- On Doctrine, 32 ANTITRUST L. J. 5 (1966)"

24 Helfrich, James S., "Limiting a Regulated Pass-on Exception to Illiois Brick, 62 St. John's L. Rev. 647 (1988)"

25 Larenz, Karl, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Ⅱ Bd., 13. Aufl., C. H. Beck, 1994"