컴퓨터 전자기록에 대한 대물적 강제처분의 해석론적 쟁점

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the democratization of Korea, the reform of its criminal procedure has strengthened procedural rights of criminal suspects and defendants. The Korean judiciary has made progressive decisions for such rights. Compared with arrest, detention, and police interrogation, however, the requirement of legitimate search-and-seizure has not been much scrutinized. This Article is to review major issues regarding the requirements of legitimate search-and-seizure warrant, focusing on searches and seizures of computer data. This Article attempts to answer the following questions which are not familiar issues in the Korean jurisprudence: Can computer data be classified as an object of seizure even though the Criminal Procedure Code prescribes the object as a tangible thing?; Can copying computer data be included in the category of seizure?; Which is the place where searches of computer data should be specified in a warrant, the place where computer is seized or the place where law enforcement authorities actually start to search computer data?; Is the search strategy or protocol required to be specifically explained in a warrant?; Are law enforcement authorities allowed to seize all of he
intermingled computer data including irrelevant data for off-site review without a separate warrant?; Can law enforcement authorities open the files encrypted by a suspect or recover the hard drive formatted by a suspect?; Are saved e-mails regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code or by the Act for Communication Secrecy Protection? Then this Article concludes that more judicial control is necessary to prevent the general warrant for searches and seizure of compute data; The object, scope and method of searches and seizures should be thoroughly scrutinized when law enforcement authorities apply for a warrant and courts review it.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 오기두, "형사절차상 컴퓨터관련증거의 수집 및 이용에 관한 연구" 서울대 1997

2 "한겨레"

3 "한겨레"

4 "한겨레"

5 "한겨레"

6 "한겨레"

7 "파이낸셜 뉴스"

8 "파이낸셜 뉴스"

9 박용철, "컴퓨터 압수, 수색의 문제점" 한국형사법학회 20 (20): 129-148, 2008

10 강동욱, "컴퓨터 관련범죄의 수사에 있어서의 문제점에 대한 고찰. in: 죽헌 박양빈 교수 화감기념논문집: 현대형사법론" 707-708, 1996

11 조국, "위법수집증거배제법칙 재론" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 197-221, 2008

12 조국, "위법수집증거배제법칙" 박영사 2005

13 조국, "위법수집증거배제법칙"

14 "오마이뉴스"

15 "아시아경제"

16 "서울지방법원 제5형사부 2003.5.14 선고 2002노9492 판결"

17 "서울지방법원 제5형사부 2003.5.14 선고 2002노9492 판결"

18 "서울지방법원 2002.9.10 선고 2002고단3514 판결"

19 "보안뉴스"

20 "민중의 소리"

21 "대법원 2003.8.22 선고 2003도3344 판결"

22 "대법원 1989.3.14. 선고 88도1399 판결"

23 "노컷뉴스"

24 "경향신문"

25 "最高裁 昭和 33. 7. 29. 刑集12卷12号"

26 안경옥, "情報化社會의 새로운 搜査기법과 개인의 情報保護" 한국비교형사법학회 5 (5): 13-334, 2003

27 "大阪高判 平成 3. 11. 6. 判タ 796号"

28 小津博司, "令狀による差押え(2)―フロツピ-ドィスクの差押え. in: 刑事訴訟法判例百選(第七版)" 1998

29 "United States Department of Justice, Search & Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations, Chapter 2, C, 2. b"

30 Josua Dressler, "Understanding Criminal Procedure(3rd ed.)" 205-210, 2002

31 Kuk Cho, "The Unfinished “Criminal Procedure Revolution” of Post-Democratization South Korea" 377 : 380-388, 2002

32 Kuk Cho, "The Ongoing Reconstruction of Korean Criminal Justice System" 1 : 2006

33 Orin S. Kerr, "Searches and Seizures in a Digital World" Harv. L. Rev.

34 Orin S. Kerr, "Search Warrants in an Era Digital Evidence" 85 : 101-102, 2005

35 Orin S. Kerr, "Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data" 119 : 702-705, 2010

36 Susan W. Brenner, "Computer Searches and Seizures: Unsolved Issues" 39 : 46-55, 2001

37 "<시사저널> (1037호, 2009년 9월 2일자)"