RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SCOPUS SCIE KCI등재

    원발 병소로부터의 전이기간에 따른 전이성 뇌종양 환자의 예후 = Prognosis of the Parenchymal Brain Metastasis According to Primary-to-Metastatic Interval

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40034511

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The authors analyzed and compared three prognostic factors of the intraparenchymal metastatic brain tumors, regardless of therapeutic modalities to evaluate the value of time-interval between diagnosis of primary cancer and brain metastasis as a prognostic factor. Out of the 109 patients of metastatic brain tumor admitted to Kosin Medical College from 1984 to 1991, 93 patients were included in this retrospective study. The survival time of these patients was statistically evaluated according to each prognostic factor. The results were as follows. Patients with mild or no neurological deficits and patients with moderate neurological deficits showed longer survival than the patients with severe neurological deficits(P<0.001).
    The presence of systemic metastasis at the time of diagnosis also significantly shortened overall survival(P<0.0095). Primary-to-metastatic interval did not significantly affect overall survival(P<0.6164), but the patients with brain metastasis detected within 1 year after diagnosis of the primary cancer had a longer median survival than those detected after 1 year(P<0.001).
    We conclude that the primary-to-metastatic interval is not valuable as a prognostic factor for intraparenchymal metastatic brain tumor, and further prospective study tailored to each specific condition will be needed for more accurate evaluation of prognostic factors.

    번역하기

    The authors analyzed and compared three prognostic factors of the intraparenchymal metastatic brain tumors, regardless of therapeutic modalities to evaluate the value of time-interval between diagnosis of primary cancer and brain metastasis as a progn...

    The authors analyzed and compared three prognostic factors of the intraparenchymal metastatic brain tumors, regardless of therapeutic modalities to evaluate the value of time-interval between diagnosis of primary cancer and brain metastasis as a prognostic factor. Out of the 109 patients of metastatic brain tumor admitted to Kosin Medical College from 1984 to 1991, 93 patients were included in this retrospective study. The survival time of these patients was statistically evaluated according to each prognostic factor. The results were as follows. Patients with mild or no neurological deficits and patients with moderate neurological deficits showed longer survival than the patients with severe neurological deficits(P<0.001).
    The presence of systemic metastasis at the time of diagnosis also significantly shortened overall survival(P<0.0095). Primary-to-metastatic interval did not significantly affect overall survival(P<0.6164), but the patients with brain metastasis detected within 1 year after diagnosis of the primary cancer had a longer median survival than those detected after 1 year(P<0.001).
    We conclude that the primary-to-metastatic interval is not valuable as a prognostic factor for intraparenchymal metastatic brain tumor, and further prospective study tailored to each specific condition will be needed for more accurate evaluation of prognostic factors.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼