RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    ‘자율교섭’과 ‘교섭단위분리’에 관한 법적 쟁점

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60082859

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (TULRA) was revised in 2010 and the implementation of the multiple union systems started in 2011. This implementation means a shift from a system permitting only one labor union per company to one that allows many unions for the same company. Autonomous agreement under the “voluntary collective bargaining system” is the ideal way to negotiate. However, if multiple trade unions are organized in the same workplace, it appears that competition between labor unions to acquire the right to represent workers during negotiations will be intensify and labor disputes not only between unions but also between labor and management will be prone to occur. Moreover, we can also imagine that there will be discriminations in working conditions between unions. Therefore, to solve these problems, TULRA introduced “bargaining channel unification system”.
    On the other hand, the system to separate bargaining unit is based on the unification of bargaining channel, thus its object differs from voluntary bargaining. Nevertheless, both systems are designed to bring the same outcomes depending on their operation methods. The voluntary bargaining, of course, can be conducted under the agreements between labor and management (strictly speaking ‘consents by employers’). However, the separation of bargaining unit is premised on the decision of Labor Relations Commission, and if the labor committee accepts the separation of bargaining units, even a minority union will be able to engage in bargaining individually as well. In other words, there is possibility for the labor and management to strategically select the voluntary bargaining and the separation of bargaining unit.
    Although the voluntary bargaining and the separation of bargaining unit are very important issue in collective bargaining, there are no related regulations on these bargaining systems but general clauses. Of course, since the labor and management have their own initiatives in choosing the negotiations such as voluntary bargaining or separation of bargaining unit, it is not to be desired that when the legislation is deeply involved in the negotiations of unions, the principle of labor-management autonomy will be damaged.
    Therefore, it is imperative to operate the system of unification of bargaining window that was introduced in the revised TULRA in 2010 in accordance with the original purpose of legislation. Furthermore, regarding to voluntary bargaining and separation of bargaining unit, this paper presents the rational standard of interpretation towards the legal issues mentioned in the paper to make an effort to minimize and to overcome the confusions at the actual scene of labor.
    번역하기

    Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (TULRA) was revised in 2010 and the implementation of the multiple union systems started in 2011. This implementation means a shift from a system permitting only one labor union per company to one that al...

    Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (TULRA) was revised in 2010 and the implementation of the multiple union systems started in 2011. This implementation means a shift from a system permitting only one labor union per company to one that allows many unions for the same company. Autonomous agreement under the “voluntary collective bargaining system” is the ideal way to negotiate. However, if multiple trade unions are organized in the same workplace, it appears that competition between labor unions to acquire the right to represent workers during negotiations will be intensify and labor disputes not only between unions but also between labor and management will be prone to occur. Moreover, we can also imagine that there will be discriminations in working conditions between unions. Therefore, to solve these problems, TULRA introduced “bargaining channel unification system”.
    On the other hand, the system to separate bargaining unit is based on the unification of bargaining channel, thus its object differs from voluntary bargaining. Nevertheless, both systems are designed to bring the same outcomes depending on their operation methods. The voluntary bargaining, of course, can be conducted under the agreements between labor and management (strictly speaking ‘consents by employers’). However, the separation of bargaining unit is premised on the decision of Labor Relations Commission, and if the labor committee accepts the separation of bargaining units, even a minority union will be able to engage in bargaining individually as well. In other words, there is possibility for the labor and management to strategically select the voluntary bargaining and the separation of bargaining unit.
    Although the voluntary bargaining and the separation of bargaining unit are very important issue in collective bargaining, there are no related regulations on these bargaining systems but general clauses. Of course, since the labor and management have their own initiatives in choosing the negotiations such as voluntary bargaining or separation of bargaining unit, it is not to be desired that when the legislation is deeply involved in the negotiations of unions, the principle of labor-management autonomy will be damaged.
    Therefore, it is imperative to operate the system of unification of bargaining window that was introduced in the revised TULRA in 2010 in accordance with the original purpose of legislation. Furthermore, regarding to voluntary bargaining and separation of bargaining unit, this paper presents the rational standard of interpretation towards the legal issues mentioned in the paper to make an effort to minimize and to overcome the confusions at the actual scene of labor.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2019-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼