RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    아이젠하워 행정부의 중동 집단방위체제 구상의 좌절 = Eisenhower's Failure in the Making of Middle East Collective Security System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100087755

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this article is to investigate the problem of American global strategy towards the Middle East without considering regional traits. In this sense, this article attempts to show the failure of American global cold war policy due to the conflicts between American global containment strategy and the unique aspects in the Middle East. The failure of the Baghdad Pact can be considered as a historical case in which American global cold war policy ended up failure after misperceiving regional traits of Nasserism, that is Arab nationalism led by Gamal Abdel Nasser.
    In this regard, the United States tried to manipulate Nasser's revolutionary government in order to make Egypt to join in the Middle East collective security system. However, this manipulation strategy can be seen as the outcome of misperceiving Nasser's intentions. With this in mind, after the Anglo-Egyptian treaty on the Suez Canal in 1954, Washington tried to establish good relations with the military junta through various strategies such as economic aid and the Alpha plan. However, Nasser participated in the Bandung conference and purchased weapons from the Communist bloc contrary to American expectation.
    Above all, it seems reasonable to assume that Eisenhower's idea of the Middle East collective security had fundamental limits stemming from the absence of collective identity and difference of threat perceptions among countries in the Middle East. With such inherit problems, it is difficult to bring Egypt into American sphere of influence in the context of the Cold War rivalry, thus resulting in the outbreak of the Suez War.
    On the other hand, the Eisenhower doctrine to contain Nasser's influence after the Suez War can also be regarded as the American strategy resulted from misperception of the influence of Nasserism. Contrary to American expectation, the authority of Khadim al-haramain (Keepers of the two holy places) in Saudi Arabia could not confront with Nasserism since Arab people more supported Nasser with his Arab nationalism particularly after the Suez War.
    Accordingly, after experiencing regional turmoil, Washington became aware of the Nasser's enormous influence and changed its coercive strategy into conciliatory one. Under this transformed strategy, the Baghdad Pact had to remain as the Northern Tier without expanding into the Middle East collective security system. After all, the idea of the Middle East collective security system ended in failure when the Baghdad Pact was dissolved into CENTO in 1959 after Iraqi withdrawal.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this article is to investigate the problem of American global strategy towards the Middle East without considering regional traits. In this sense, this article attempts to show the failure of American global cold war policy due to the c...

    The purpose of this article is to investigate the problem of American global strategy towards the Middle East without considering regional traits. In this sense, this article attempts to show the failure of American global cold war policy due to the conflicts between American global containment strategy and the unique aspects in the Middle East. The failure of the Baghdad Pact can be considered as a historical case in which American global cold war policy ended up failure after misperceiving regional traits of Nasserism, that is Arab nationalism led by Gamal Abdel Nasser.
    In this regard, the United States tried to manipulate Nasser's revolutionary government in order to make Egypt to join in the Middle East collective security system. However, this manipulation strategy can be seen as the outcome of misperceiving Nasser's intentions. With this in mind, after the Anglo-Egyptian treaty on the Suez Canal in 1954, Washington tried to establish good relations with the military junta through various strategies such as economic aid and the Alpha plan. However, Nasser participated in the Bandung conference and purchased weapons from the Communist bloc contrary to American expectation.
    Above all, it seems reasonable to assume that Eisenhower's idea of the Middle East collective security had fundamental limits stemming from the absence of collective identity and difference of threat perceptions among countries in the Middle East. With such inherit problems, it is difficult to bring Egypt into American sphere of influence in the context of the Cold War rivalry, thus resulting in the outbreak of the Suez War.
    On the other hand, the Eisenhower doctrine to contain Nasser's influence after the Suez War can also be regarded as the American strategy resulted from misperception of the influence of Nasserism. Contrary to American expectation, the authority of Khadim al-haramain (Keepers of the two holy places) in Saudi Arabia could not confront with Nasserism since Arab people more supported Nasser with his Arab nationalism particularly after the Suez War.
    Accordingly, after experiencing regional turmoil, Washington became aware of the Nasser's enormous influence and changed its coercive strategy into conciliatory one. Under this transformed strategy, the Baghdad Pact had to remain as the Northern Tier without expanding into the Middle East collective security system. After all, the idea of the Middle East collective security system ended in failure when the Baghdad Pact was dissolved into CENTO in 1959 after Iraqi withdrawal.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 미국의 중동 집단방위체제 구상의 실패
    • Ⅲ. 나세리즘 조정 실패와 바그다드 조약기구의 약화
    • Ⅳ. 나세리즘 봉쇄 실패와 바그다드 조약기구의 해체
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 미국의 중동 집단방위체제 구상의 실패
    • Ⅲ. 나세리즘 조정 실패와 바그다드 조약기구의 약화
    • Ⅳ. 나세리즘 봉쇄 실패와 바그다드 조약기구의 해체
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이철순, "아이젠하워 정권의 뉴룩전략과 미국의 대한정책, 동아시아 냉전과 한미일 관계" 연세대학교 현대한국학연구소 (3) : 2002

    2 권오신, "아이젠하워 대외정책의 기조: ‘뉴룩(New Look)’ 정책과 ‘아이젠하워 독트린’" 한국미국사학회 21 : 141-173, 2005

    3 황병하, "아랍민족주의와 아랍통합 운동" 16 (16): 1997

    4 서재만, "수에즈 전쟁 연구" 중동연구소 23 (23): 3-32, 2004

    5 신욱희, "비대칭적 동맹에서의 갈등:정치심리학적 측면" 국가안전보장문제연구소 50 (50): 3-29, 2007

    6 전재성, "동맹이론과 한국의 동맹정책" 국가안전보장문제연구소 47 (47): 63-94, 2004

    7 서재만, "냉전초기 중동의 안보에 관한 연구" 한국중동학회 24 (24): 45-75, 2003

    8 朴鍾坪, "낫세르 권위주의정권에 관한 연구 : 정치·경제적 시각" 慶熙大學校 大學院 1995

    9 Hemmer, C., "Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 2002

    10 Walt, Stephen, "Why Alliance Endure or Collapse" 39 (39): 1997

    1 이철순, "아이젠하워 정권의 뉴룩전략과 미국의 대한정책, 동아시아 냉전과 한미일 관계" 연세대학교 현대한국학연구소 (3) : 2002

    2 권오신, "아이젠하워 대외정책의 기조: ‘뉴룩(New Look)’ 정책과 ‘아이젠하워 독트린’" 한국미국사학회 21 : 141-173, 2005

    3 황병하, "아랍민족주의와 아랍통합 운동" 16 (16): 1997

    4 서재만, "수에즈 전쟁 연구" 중동연구소 23 (23): 3-32, 2004

    5 신욱희, "비대칭적 동맹에서의 갈등:정치심리학적 측면" 국가안전보장문제연구소 50 (50): 3-29, 2007

    6 전재성, "동맹이론과 한국의 동맹정책" 국가안전보장문제연구소 47 (47): 63-94, 2004

    7 서재만, "냉전초기 중동의 안보에 관한 연구" 한국중동학회 24 (24): 45-75, 2003

    8 朴鍾坪, "낫세르 권위주의정권에 관한 연구 : 정치·경제적 시각" 慶熙大學校 大學院 1995

    9 Hemmer, C., "Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 2002

    10 Walt, Stephen, "Why Alliance Endure or Collapse" 39 (39): 1997

    11 Shemesh, Moshe, "The Suez-Sinai Crisis, 1956: retrospective and reappraisal" Taylor & Francis 1990

    12 Hasou, Tawfiq, "The Struggle for the Arab World : Egypt's Nasser and the Arab League" KPI 1982

    13 Podeh, Elie, "The Struggle Over Arab Hegemony after the Suez Crisis" 29 (29): 1993

    14 Touval, Saadia, "The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-1979" Princeton University Press 1982

    15 Takeyh, Ray, "The Origins of Eisenhower Doctrine: The US, Britain, and Nasser;s Egypt, 1953-57" St. Martin's Press 2000

    16 Yesilbursa, Behcet Kemal, "The Baghdad Pact: Anglo-American defence policies in the Middle East, 1950-1959" Frank Cass 2005

    17 Gaddis, J. L., "Strategies of Containment" Oxford University Press 1982

    18 Adler, Emanuel, "Security Communities" Cambridge University Press 1998

    19 Jervis, Robert, "Perception and Misperception in International Politics" Princeton University Press 1976

    20 Haykal, Muhammad Hasanayn, "Li misr La Li Abd al-Nasr" Dar Al-Shuruq 2003

    21 Dann, Uriel, "Hussein and the Challenge of Arab Radicalism, Jordan, 1955-1967" Oxford University Press 1989

    22 U.S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958-1960. Vol. 12" U.S. Government Printing Office 1989

    23 U.S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958-1960. Vol. 11" U.S. Government Printing Office 1992

    24 U. S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955-1957. Vol. 13. Near East : Jordan-Yemen" Government Printing Office 1989-1991, 1989

    25 U. S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955-1957. Vol. 12. Near East : Multilateral Relations; Iran; Iraq" Government Printing Office 1989-1991, 1992

    26 U. S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. Vol. 9. The Near and Middle East" Government Printing Office 1989-1991, 1986

    27 Yaqub, Salim, "Containing Arab Nationalism: The Eisenhower Doctrine and the Middle East" University of North Carolina Press 1991

    28 Hahn, Peter L, "Caught in the Middle East, 1945-1961" The University of North Carolina Press 2004

    29 Stevens, George. G, "Arab Nationalism and Bandung" (Spring) : 1957

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-10-27 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of The Middle East Studies -> Korean Association Of Middle East Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-06-16 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국중동학회 논총
    외국어명 : Korean Journal of the Middle East Studies
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.33 0.716 0.05
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼