RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    키렌 이건의 상상력 활용 교육이론과 실천

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100007918

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Kieran Egan is an educational philosopher whose emphasis on imagination, storytelling, and other tools of understanding offers new and provocative insights into what it means to be educated.
    Egan suggests that not enough attention is given to the role imagination plays in education or in our vision of what it means to be educated. Instead of imagination, the modern world has embraced a set of ad hoc principles which continue to have a pervasive and profound influence on teaching practice and curriculum design. According to these principles, education proceeds from the concrete to the abstract, from the simple to the complex, from the known to the unknown, from active manipulation to symbolic conceptualization.
    Egan offers numerous counter-examples, not to debunk these ad hoc principles, but to suggest that they are not always the most effective way to educate and that they do not encompass the totality of education. To balance the widely accepted dictum that children learn best from concrete, hand-on experiences, Egan explains that much of the literature for young children depends upon the child's prior understanding of various underlying, but abstract, concepts. Using the story Cinderella to illustrate his point, Egan notes that five-year-old children have no trouble understanding and enjoying his story, though such understanding is dependent on their ability to grasp such abstract and conflicting concepts as fear/hope, kindness/cruelty, and good/evil.
    Egan offers us a new theory that describes education in terms of a sequence of kinds of understanding. Suggesting that human beings developed multiple tools for understanding their world, Egan characterizes several distinctive ways of understanding as the Somatic, Mythic, Romantic, Philosophic and Ironic ways of knowing. According to Egan, to be educated means to acquire these kinds of understanding as fully as possible in the sequence in which each developed historically. In short, Egan proposes a new kind of recapitulation theory which, when combined with insights from Vygotsky, leads to a new educational idea.
    Learning in Depth program (LiD) is designed as an additional contribution schools can make to students' education. Though relatively simple, it has the potential to make a major impact. The aim is to build knowledge, understanding, skills, and practices fundamental to effective learning. That sounds like a very weighty thing, but LiD is both easy to implement and does not cost much to do so, and yet it delivers a very considerable educational benefit to students, especially for developing students' imagination.
    번역하기

    Kieran Egan is an educational philosopher whose emphasis on imagination, storytelling, and other tools of understanding offers new and provocative insights into what it means to be educated. Egan suggests that not enough attention is given to the role...

    Kieran Egan is an educational philosopher whose emphasis on imagination, storytelling, and other tools of understanding offers new and provocative insights into what it means to be educated.
    Egan suggests that not enough attention is given to the role imagination plays in education or in our vision of what it means to be educated. Instead of imagination, the modern world has embraced a set of ad hoc principles which continue to have a pervasive and profound influence on teaching practice and curriculum design. According to these principles, education proceeds from the concrete to the abstract, from the simple to the complex, from the known to the unknown, from active manipulation to symbolic conceptualization.
    Egan offers numerous counter-examples, not to debunk these ad hoc principles, but to suggest that they are not always the most effective way to educate and that they do not encompass the totality of education. To balance the widely accepted dictum that children learn best from concrete, hand-on experiences, Egan explains that much of the literature for young children depends upon the child's prior understanding of various underlying, but abstract, concepts. Using the story Cinderella to illustrate his point, Egan notes that five-year-old children have no trouble understanding and enjoying his story, though such understanding is dependent on their ability to grasp such abstract and conflicting concepts as fear/hope, kindness/cruelty, and good/evil.
    Egan offers us a new theory that describes education in terms of a sequence of kinds of understanding. Suggesting that human beings developed multiple tools for understanding their world, Egan characterizes several distinctive ways of understanding as the Somatic, Mythic, Romantic, Philosophic and Ironic ways of knowing. According to Egan, to be educated means to acquire these kinds of understanding as fully as possible in the sequence in which each developed historically. In short, Egan proposes a new kind of recapitulation theory which, when combined with insights from Vygotsky, leads to a new educational idea.
    Learning in Depth program (LiD) is designed as an additional contribution schools can make to students' education. Though relatively simple, it has the potential to make a major impact. The aim is to build knowledge, understanding, skills, and practices fundamental to effective learning. That sounds like a very weighty thing, but LiD is both easy to implement and does not cost much to do so, and yet it delivers a very considerable educational benefit to students, especially for developing students' imagination.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Bettelheim, Bruno, "옛 이야기의매력1" 시공주니어 1998

    2 Root-Bernstein, Robert, "생각의 탄생" 에코의 서재 2007

    3 홍명희, "상상력과 가스통 바슐라르" 살림 출판사 2011

    4 이지헌, "가르침이란 무엇인가?" 교육과학사 2011

    5 "http://www.sfu.ca/~egan"

    6 "http://www.education.nsysu.edu.tw/TICE2011"

    7 "http://www.educ.sfu.ca/kegan/"

    8 "http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0723/p01s03-uspo.html"

    9 "http://ierg.net/lid"

    10 "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieran_Egan_(educationist)"

    1 Bettelheim, Bruno, "옛 이야기의매력1" 시공주니어 1998

    2 Root-Bernstein, Robert, "생각의 탄생" 에코의 서재 2007

    3 홍명희, "상상력과 가스통 바슐라르" 살림 출판사 2011

    4 이지헌, "가르침이란 무엇인가?" 교육과학사 2011

    5 "http://www.sfu.ca/~egan"

    6 "http://www.education.nsysu.edu.tw/TICE2011"

    7 "http://www.educ.sfu.ca/kegan/"

    8 "http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0723/p01s03-uspo.html"

    9 "http://ierg.net/lid"

    10 "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieran_Egan_(educationist)"

    11 Egan, K., "Values and Imagination in Teaching: With a Special Focus on Social Studies" 41 (41): 126-140, 2008

    12 Knoll, M., "The project method: Its origin and international influence. In Progressive education across the continent" Lang 1995

    13 Gardner, H., "The disciplined mind: What all students should understand" Simon and Schuster 1999

    14 Peters, R.S., "The Logic of Education" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1970

    15 Egan, K., "The Future of Education.: Reimagining Our Schools from the Ground up" Yale University Press 2008

    16 Egan, K., "The Educated Mind.: How Cognitive Tools Shapes Our Understanding" The University of Chicago Press 1997

    17 Egan, K., "Teaching as Story Telling: An Alternative approach to teaching and curriculum in the elementary school" The University of Chicago Press 1986

    18 Johnson, T. W., "Philosophical Documents in Education" Pearson Education, Inc 2008

    19 Russell, Bertrand, "On education" Unwin 1926

    20 Egan, K., "Learning in Depth" University Of Chicago Press 2010

    21 Egan, K., "Imagination and Education" Teachers College 1999

    22 Egan, K., "Engaging Imagination and Developing Creativity In Education" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2010

    23 Egan, K., "Education's Three Old Ideas and a Better Idea" 31 (31): 257-267, 1999

    24 Lamm, Zvi, "Conflicting theories of instruction: Conceptual dimensions" McCutchan 1976

    25 Egan, K., "An Imaginative Approach to teaching" John Wiley& Sons 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-09-26 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Educational Idea Association -> The Korean Association of Educational Ideas KCI등재
    2022-06-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Educational Idea -> The Korean Journal of Educational Ideas KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-04-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국교육사상연구회 -> 한국교육사상학회
    영문명 : The Korean Society For Study Of Educational Idea -> Korean Educational Idea Association
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.57
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.55 0.89 0.46
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼