한국인 학습자들의 영어 전치사구 부가 모호성 해결 책략에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates how Korean learners resolve prepositional phrase attachment ambiguities in English verb phrase-noun phrase-prepositional phrase(VP-NP-PP) sequences. In the methodological approach of study, there is difference between previous studies and this study. Previous studies focused on linguistic performance through the on-line task, whereas this study focuses on linguistic competence by the off-line task. However, task sentences are similar to those by previous studies. The findings indicate that to resolve prepositional phrase attachment ambiguities, Korean learners in this study show different processing mechanisms with respect to argument status(argument/adjunct). When prepositional phrases are arguments, Korean learners use processing strategy based on lexical information, which supports the theory of argument preference strategy. However, when prepositional phrases are adjuncts, they depend on language-specific recency strategy. Generally, attachments as argument are preferred to attachments as adjunct.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 이론적 배경
• 2.1. 구조 정보에 근거한 책략
• 2.2. 어휘 정보에 근거한 책략
• 2.3. L2 특정적 책략
• 2.4. 선행 연구
• 3. 실험
• 3.1. 실험 방법
• 3.2. 실험 가설
• 3.3. 실험 대상
• 3.4. 실험 자료
• 3.5. 실험 결과
• 3.6. 결과 논의
• 4. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Boland, J. E, "The Role of Verb Argument Structure in Sentence Processing : Distinguishing Between Syntactic and Semantic Effects" 22 : 133-152, 1993

2 Ferreira, F., "The Independence of Syntactic Processing" 25 : 348-368, 1986

3 Fernández, E. M., "The Development of Second Language Grammars: A Genitive Approach" John Benjamins 217-239, 1999

4 Gorrell, P., "Syntax and Parsing" Cambridge University Press 1995

5 Frenck-Mestre, C., "Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution while Reading in Second and Native Languages" 50 : 119-148, 1997

6 Dussias, P., "Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Learners : Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies" 25 (25): 529-557, 2003

7 Rah, A., "Sentence Processing in a Second Language: Ambiguity Resolution in German Learners of English" University of Cologne, Germany 2009

8 1Gibson, E., "Recency Preference in the Human Sentence Processing Mechanism" 59 : 23-59, 1996

9 Speer, S., "Plausibility and Argument Structure in Sentence Comprehension" 26 : 965-978, 1998

10 Clifton, C., "Parsing Arguments : Phrase Structure and Argument Structure as Determinants of Initial Parsing Decisions" 30 : 251-271, 1991

11 Frazier, L., "Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding" MIT Press 291-307, 1987

12 Frazier, L., "Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension : Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences" 14 : 178-210, 1982

13 Boland, J. E., "Lexical Constraints and Prepositional Phrase Attachment" 39 : 684-719, 1998

14 Juffs, A., "Learnability and the Lexicon: Theories and Second Language Acquisition Research" John Benjamins 1996

15 Tarallo, F., "Interference and Natural Language Processing in Second Language Acquisition" 33 : 55-76, 1983

16 Schachter, J., "Grammaticality Judgements: Why does Anyone Object to Subject Extraction?" 12 : 379-392, 1990

17 Juffs, A., "Garden-Path Sentences and Error Data in Second Language Processing Research" 46 : 283-326, 1996

18 Schűtze, C., "Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment" 40 : 409-431, 1999

19 Boland, J. E., "Argument Status and PP-Attachment" 35 : 385-403, 2006

20 Schűtze, C., "Another Look at Minimal Attachment : Thematic Factors in PP-Attachment" 567-578, 1995

21 Abney, S., "A Computational Model of Human Parsing" 18 : 129-144, 1989