RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose : In this study we examine the evolution and current status of AEO (authorized economic operator) authorization since the AEO program was introduced, and review the existing literature to identify AEO-related issues that need to be addressed. By doing so, we aim to propose policy changes and possible improvements to promote the AEO authorization of domestic businesses.
Research design, data, methodology : Analysis is conducted through reviewing 52 journal publications on the application of AEOs by domestic companies, and other AEO-related papers, by categorizing their subjects, research methods, and data analysis methods. Additionally, based on the issues raised in the previous literature, we analyze possible policy changes by conducting interviews with the relevant authorities - the Korea Customs Service (KCS) and the Korea AEO Association.
Results : The analysis results are as follows. First, AEO programs are expanding throughout the world. Korea is no exception, with more than 903 businesses having been authorized as AEOs. Second, an increasing number of studies are being conducted on AEOs - particularly regarding the subject of ‘AEO programs by country’ - with literature reviews accounting for the majority of the research. Interview results indicate that the issue of applications - which had been a matter of concern in previous research - was addressed by the introduction of Guideline 4.0 and the 4th-generation customs administration system (UNI-PASS) by the KCS. Additionally, these changes are being supplemented with the provision of training and consulting programs for individual businesses. A diverse range of support measures are being pursued to promote post-authorization monitoring, including the reinforcement of the designated consultant program.
Conclusions : This study is the first to conduct AEO-related literature reviews mostly domestic studies, categorizing them by subject, research method, and data analysis method, in addition to interviews with the relevant authorities (KCS and the Korea AEO Association), to derive implications regarding policy changes and possible improvements.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤준모, "한국 AEO 상호인정협정의 원활화 방안에 관한연구: 중남미국가들과의 체결을 중심으로" 한국무역연구원 12 (12): 647-666, 2016

2 라공우, "한·일 AEO제도와 MRA의 실효성에 관한 고찰" 한국무역학회 39 (39): 213-232, 2014

3 최준호, "한-중 AEO MRA 체결에 따른 공인기업 확대방안에 관한 연구" 한국무역연구원 9 (9): 721-738, 2013

4 김종득, "중국내 물류보안 동향과 AEO제도 운영에 관한 고찰" 한국국제상학회 26 (26): 137-154, 2011

5 김종훈, "중국 AEO 제도의 시사점에 관한 연구" 한국해양비즈니스학회 (21) : 65-94, 2012

6 안재진, "일본의 AEO제도 추진과 우리나라 관세법상 수출입안전관리 우수공인업체 제도 추진방향 연구" 한국관세학회 9 (9): 87-110, 2008

7 정태원, "인천지역 수출입관련기업의 AEO 인증확대를 위한 실태조사와 시사점" 한국해운물류학회 28 (28): 265-284, 2012

8 김진규, "우리나라 수출입기업의 AEO 인증제도 도입에 따른 혜택 및 기대효과에 대한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 49 : 167-188, 2011

9 김귀옥, "우리나라 수출기업의 AEO 인증제도 도입확대방안에 관한 연구" 한국국제상학회 26 (26): 111-131, 2011

10 윤창기, "우리나라 무역업체의 AEO 활용에 관한 연구" 한국관세학회 12 (12): 109-131, 2011