산성배수 비탈면의 중화층 종류에 따른 녹화효과 = The Vegetation Effect of under Neutralizing Layer Type on the Acid Drainage Slope

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is composed of nine treatments [Control : “no neutralizing layer+vegetation layer” 3 cm, Treatment 1 : “no neutralizinglayer+vegetation layer” 5 cm, Treatment 2 : “no neutralizing layer+vegetation layer” 7 cm, Treatment 3 :“neutralizing layer (cement 3 %)+ vegetation layer (cement 1 %)” 3 cm, Treatment 4 : “neutralizing layer (cement 3 %)+vegetation layer (cement 1 %)” 5 cm, Treatment 5 : “neutralizing layer (cement 3 %)+vegetation layer (cement 1 %)” 7 cm, Treatment 6 : “neutralizing layer [(Ca·Mg)CO3]+vegetation layer” 3 cm, Treatment 7 : “neutralizing layer [(Ca·Mg)CO3]+vegetation layer” 5 cm, Treatment 8 : “neutralizing layer[(Ca·Mg)CO3]+vegetation layer” 7 cm] to find out the vegetation effects according to neutralizing layer types of the acid drainage slope.
There were no significant differences observed in soil hardness and soil moisture content of neutralizing layer type while highly difference of moisture content was observed according to the neutralizing and vegetation layer thickness. As for soil acidity, strong acid was shown in the control, treatment 1 and treatment 2. Neutralizing effects were outstanding in treatments of 3, 4, 5 (cement treatment group), 6, 7 and 8 (limestone treatment group). Concerning plants growth characteristics, surface coverage rates, number of germinating woody plants, plant height, and plant root status, there were excellent effects observed in the experimental groups mixed with cement (treatments 3, 4 and 5) and limestone (treatments 6, 7 and 8). At the initial stage, however, plant roots were negativelyaffected in cement layer treatments of 3, 4 and 5. However, no difference was shown in each layer thickness on the acid drainage slopewhereas 3~5 cm thickness neutralizing layer was appropriate in consideration of economic feasibility.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

산성배수 비탈면의 중화층 종류에 따른 녹화 효과를 알아보고자 9개의 실험구 [대조구: “무처리층+식생층 3 cm”, 실험1구: “무처리층+식생층 5 cm”, 실험2구: “무처리층+식생층 7 cm”, 실험3구: “중화층(cement 3 %)+식생층(cement 1 %) 3 cm”, 실험4구: “중화층(cement 3 %)+식생층(cement 1 %) 5 cm”, 실험5구: “중화층(cement 3 %) + 식생층(cement 1 %) 7cm”, 실험6구: “중화층[(Ca·Mg)CO3]+식생층 3 cm”, 실험7구: “중화층[(Ca·Mg)CO3]+식생층 5 cm”, 실험8구: “중화층[(Ca·Mg)CO3]+식생층 7 cm”]를 조성하였다. 중화층 종류에 따른 표면경도 및 함수율의 유의차이는 없었으나 두께에 따른 함수율의 차이는 있었다. 토양산도(pH)는 중화제를 처리하지 않은 실험구(대조구, 실험1구, 실험2구)에서 높게 나타났고, 시멘트를 배합한 실험구(실험3구, 실험4구, 실험5구)와 석회고토를 배합한 실험구(실험6구, 실험7구, 실험8구)에서 중화효과가 크게 나타났다. 식물생육 특성은 지면피복율, 목본류 발아개체수 및 수고, 식물 뿌리상태 등이 시멘트를 배합한 실험구 및 석회고토를 배합한 실험구에서 우수했으나 시멘트를 배합한 실험구는 초기 식물 뿌리생장에 좋지 못한 결과가 나타나 주의가 요구된다. 또한, 산성배수 비탈면의 중화층 두께에 따른 차이는 없었으며 경제성을 고려할 때 3~5 cm가 적정할 것으로 판단된다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장창희, "종자발아에 영향을 미치는 울산 정자동 절토비탈면강산성 토양의 화학적 특성" 한국환경복원기술학회 9 (9): 133-142, 2006

2 박문수, "임도 절토비탈면의 우점식물과 식물피복에 미치는 인자들의 영향 - 전라북도를 대상으로 -" 한국환경복원기술학회 5 (5): 19-27, 2002

3 김재곤, "암석의 산성배수 발생개연성 평가 및 피해저감대책: 터널건설예정구간 사례" 대한자원환경지질학회 41 (41): 335-344, 2008

4 정용호, "석탄폐광지에서의 식생기반재 처리별 수목 초기 생육상황 비교" 한국환경복원기술학회 13 (13): 87-96, 2010

5 김재환, "동절기 파종시기에 따른 훼손비탈면의 녹화특성" 한국환경복원기술학회 12 (12): 29-39, 2009

6 이진수, "고속도로 건설현장의 산성배수 발생개연성평가 및 피해저감대책:OO고속도로건설현장" 대한자원환경지질학회 46 (46): 411-424, 2013

7 김재곤, "건설현장 산성배수의 발생현황 및 피해저감대책" 대한자원환경지질학회 40 (40): 651-660, 2007

8 Smith, R. A. H., "The use of metal tolerant plant populations for the reclamation of metalliferous wastes" 16 : 595-612, 1979

9 Wilkins, D. A., "The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth" 80 : 623-633, 1978

10 SAS Institute Inc., "The SAS system for window Release 9.1"

11 Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, "Technology development for damage reduction and ecosystem restoration in acid drainage producing construction site" 5-83, 2017

12 Chung, D. Y., "Soil and Life"

13 Anonymous, "Proceedings of the association of official seed analysts" 54 (54): 1-112, 1965

14 "Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA)"

15 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Design and construction guidelines for road slope reconstruction work"

16 Matlock, M. M., "Covalent coating of coal refuse to inhibit leaching" 7 : 495-501, 2003

17 Ulrich, B., "Chemical changes due to acid precipitation in a loss-derived soil in Central Europe" 193-199, 1980

18 Johnson, D. B., "Acid mine drainage remediation options : a review" 338 : 3-14, 2005

19 Lunt, I. D., "A protocol for integrated management, monitoring, and enhancement of degraded Themeda triandra grasslands based on planting of indicator species" 11 : 223-230, 2003