RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독일의 외국인 정책 사례 연구와 한국에의 시사점

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korean society has faced much social and educational problems from foreign workers and migrant wives, because korean society has remained as a single race country for long time and has very few historic experiences to treat foreigners fairly and reasonably. So the german policy of foreign workers is very meaningfull in solving social conflicts in korean society. The hint of german policy of foreign workers are as follows. First. we must change the viewpoint of foreign workers. Foreign workers in Korea are evaluated very lowly compared with their roles. Now their role must be newly lighted on korean economy, because middle sized companies can not be operated without their labour forces. Foreign workers are indipensable in contemprary and future period, because birth rate will decrease so sharply year by year. Foreign workers must be considered as basic human resources of korean economy. Secondly, “Encouragement Law for Multi-Culture Family(ELMC)” was enacted in year of 2010. But this law focus on only supporting for the multi-cultural families. It does not regulate whole governance of realisation of multi culturism in korean society. The problemes of migrant wives and foreign workers can not be solved only by economical aid, but by whole social systems. German policy focus on the social intergration of migrant workers, migrant families and their children Third, policies of foreign workers must be changed from recruitment of low skilled man powers to employment of professionals. German and other developed governments give an many incentives to the foreign professionals by inviting them in their own countries. The examples of incentives are exemption of employment visa issue or quota control of nummbers of employees. issuing of permanent residential visa. Now korean government must introduce permanent visa for the high skilled foreign workers Forth. illegal workers must have some opportunities to be legalized under some conditions. Most of developed countries give them legal status occasionally. German government support illegal workers air fares and tuition fees of job creation in their borned countries. In any cases, illegal worker can not be avoided in the all of the world, because they can not have chances in their own countries. Korean employers want also to employ them so long, because they can become high skilled workers in few years, and they are so productive comparing with new comers. Now government must consider to invite foreign workers with their families and give them permanent residential visa, if they have high skilled technology and their employers agree to employ in long term. Finally, the policy of foreign workers must be changed from the economic view point. Foreign workers should find their vision in Korea and have success story. They have human rights and must be protected by labour laws. They deserve respect for their role and royalty to the companies. If companies need them, korean government must give them rights to work in Korea.
    번역하기

    Korean society has faced much social and educational problems from foreign workers and migrant wives, because korean society has remained as a single race country for long time and has very few historic experiences to treat foreigners fairly and reaso...

    Korean society has faced much social and educational problems from foreign workers and migrant wives, because korean society has remained as a single race country for long time and has very few historic experiences to treat foreigners fairly and reasonably. So the german policy of foreign workers is very meaningfull in solving social conflicts in korean society. The hint of german policy of foreign workers are as follows. First. we must change the viewpoint of foreign workers. Foreign workers in Korea are evaluated very lowly compared with their roles. Now their role must be newly lighted on korean economy, because middle sized companies can not be operated without their labour forces. Foreign workers are indipensable in contemprary and future period, because birth rate will decrease so sharply year by year. Foreign workers must be considered as basic human resources of korean economy. Secondly, “Encouragement Law for Multi-Culture Family(ELMC)” was enacted in year of 2010. But this law focus on only supporting for the multi-cultural families. It does not regulate whole governance of realisation of multi culturism in korean society. The problemes of migrant wives and foreign workers can not be solved only by economical aid, but by whole social systems. German policy focus on the social intergration of migrant workers, migrant families and their children Third, policies of foreign workers must be changed from recruitment of low skilled man powers to employment of professionals. German and other developed governments give an many incentives to the foreign professionals by inviting them in their own countries. The examples of incentives are exemption of employment visa issue or quota control of nummbers of employees. issuing of permanent residential visa. Now korean government must introduce permanent visa for the high skilled foreign workers Forth. illegal workers must have some opportunities to be legalized under some conditions. Most of developed countries give them legal status occasionally. German government support illegal workers air fares and tuition fees of job creation in their borned countries. In any cases, illegal worker can not be avoided in the all of the world, because they can not have chances in their own countries. Korean employers want also to employ them so long, because they can become high skilled workers in few years, and they are so productive comparing with new comers. Now government must consider to invite foreign workers with their families and give them permanent residential visa, if they have high skilled technology and their employers agree to employ in long term. Finally, the policy of foreign workers must be changed from the economic view point. Foreign workers should find their vision in Korea and have success story. They have human rights and must be protected by labour laws. They deserve respect for their role and royalty to the companies. If companies need them, korean government must give them rights to work in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 독일의 외국인 정책 사례 연구와 한국에의 시사점
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 독일외국인력 현황과 외국인력정책의 개요와 특이점 및 우리나라와의 비교
    • Ⅲ. 독일 외국인 근로자 고용과 근로 관련 주요 법규내용 및 입국 후 고용관리
    • Ⅳ. 독일(OECD)외국인력 정책의 시사점(결론을 대신하여)
    • 독일의 외국인 정책 사례 연구와 한국에의 시사점
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 독일외국인력 현황과 외국인력정책의 개요와 특이점 및 우리나라와의 비교
    • Ⅲ. 독일 외국인 근로자 고용과 근로 관련 주요 법규내용 및 입국 후 고용관리
    • Ⅳ. 독일(OECD)외국인력 정책의 시사점(결론을 대신하여)
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 현대경제연구원, "주요국 외국인력 정책비교 및 시사점- 산업노동력확보를 위한 외국인력 정책방안-" 11 (11): 2011

    2 최 홍, "외국인 고용허가제의 현황과 개선 방안" (326) : 2011

    3 "연합뉴스"

    4 "국회입법조사처 보도자료"

    5 "국회입법조사처 보도자료"

    6 "국제노동브리프, 2007년 8월호"

    7 설동훈, "각국의 외국인근로자 고용관리체계 사례연구" 노동부 연구용역 2004

    8 "日本經濟新聞"

    9 "Spiegel, 2011.6. 22, Fachkräftemangel: Schwarz-Gelb lockt ausländische Arbeitnehmer"

    10 "Presse Info 09/2003 vom 15/01/2003; Presse Info 013/2003 vom 13/02/2003"

    1 현대경제연구원, "주요국 외국인력 정책비교 및 시사점- 산업노동력확보를 위한 외국인력 정책방안-" 11 (11): 2011

    2 최 홍, "외국인 고용허가제의 현황과 개선 방안" (326) : 2011

    3 "연합뉴스"

    4 "국회입법조사처 보도자료"

    5 "국회입법조사처 보도자료"

    6 "국제노동브리프, 2007년 8월호"

    7 설동훈, "각국의 외국인근로자 고용관리체계 사례연구" 노동부 연구용역 2004

    8 "日本經濟新聞"

    9 "Spiegel, 2011.6. 22, Fachkräftemangel: Schwarz-Gelb lockt ausländische Arbeitnehmer"

    10 "Presse Info 09/2003 vom 15/01/2003; Presse Info 013/2003 vom 13/02/2003"

    11 주OECD 대표부, "OECD국가의 외국인력정책 동향과 시사점" 2007

    12 "Federal Republic of Germany"

    13 "Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.62 0.62 0.57
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.57 0.63 0.876 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼