RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      교육과정의 성격에 대한 구성주의 관점이 시사 = Exploring the characteristics of curriculum : a Constructivistic point of view

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679242

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is an effort to analyze the implications of the constructivism on conceptualizing the characteristics of curriculum. During the last few years the number of references to constructivism in the educational literature has increased in a startling fashion. However, the epistemological premises of constructivism are not fully understood and many people are led to believe that the adoption of constructivism is possible adhering to their objectivistic way of thinking at the same time. In addition to that, the constructivism is often considered as a panacea which will rescue education from whatever crisis it is in. So, I tried to clarify the epistemological basis of constructivism, and based upon that, identify its implications on the characteristics of curriculum. The pivotal characteristics of curriculum accordant with constructivism are identified as follows: First, the curriculum is conceived. as an ongoing interactive practice, not as an external fact imposed on teachers and learners. Second, the curriculum is considered as value-laden, inclusive, multiple entity, not as neutral, exclusive, universal body of truth. Third, the curriculum is composed with the materials to think, explore with interest and enthusiasm, not with the authoritative truth to master and internalize. Forth, the curriculum is composed with meaningful integrated experiences, not with strictly discrete knowledge of subject matters. Finally, the curriculum is organized with recursive and reflective way which provides useful scaffoldings to enable students to get an authentic sense of learning, rather than additive and linear way which presents the most recent version of knowledge stripped of debates, confusion, and discords.
      번역하기

      This study is an effort to analyze the implications of the constructivism on conceptualizing the characteristics of curriculum. During the last few years the number of references to constructivism in the educational literature has increased in a start...

      This study is an effort to analyze the implications of the constructivism on conceptualizing the characteristics of curriculum. During the last few years the number of references to constructivism in the educational literature has increased in a startling fashion. However, the epistemological premises of constructivism are not fully understood and many people are led to believe that the adoption of constructivism is possible adhering to their objectivistic way of thinking at the same time. In addition to that, the constructivism is often considered as a panacea which will rescue education from whatever crisis it is in. So, I tried to clarify the epistemological basis of constructivism, and based upon that, identify its implications on the characteristics of curriculum. The pivotal characteristics of curriculum accordant with constructivism are identified as follows: First, the curriculum is conceived. as an ongoing interactive practice, not as an external fact imposed on teachers and learners. Second, the curriculum is considered as value-laden, inclusive, multiple entity, not as neutral, exclusive, universal body of truth. Third, the curriculum is composed with the materials to think, explore with interest and enthusiasm, not with the authoritative truth to master and internalize. Forth, the curriculum is composed with meaningful integrated experiences, not with strictly discrete knowledge of subject matters. Finally, the curriculum is organized with recursive and reflective way which provides useful scaffoldings to enable students to get an authentic sense of learning, rather than additive and linear way which presents the most recent version of knowledge stripped of debates, confusion, and discords.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼