RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      北京奥运体育仲裁的理论与实践 = The Theory and Practice of the Beijing Olympic Games Sports Arbitration

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104237445

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      由于通过诉讼途径解决体育纠纷存在种种困难,目前奥运会期间的体育纠纷都是由国际体育仲裁院(CAS)特别仲裁机构的快速仲裁机制解决的,2008年北京奥运会亦不例外。《奥林匹克宪章》第59条明确了CAS特别仲裁机构对奥运会期间体育纠纷的排他性管辖权,所有参加奥运会的运动员、教练员、裁判员所填写的参赛报名表中,都包含了接受CAS专属管辖权的强制性仲裁条款。北京奥运会CAS特别仲裁实践维护了体育法的一些基本原则,如禁止反言原则、保护运动员参赛权利原则、技术事项不予审查原则等。中国最高司法机关对CAS北京特别仲裁机制的运作明确表示了支持。
      번역하기

      由于通过诉讼途径解决体育纠纷存在种种困难,目前奥运会期间的体育纠纷都是由国际体育仲裁院(CAS)特别仲裁机构的快速仲裁机制解决的,2008年北京奥运会亦不例外。《奥林匹克宪章》...

      由于通过诉讼途径解决体育纠纷存在种种困难,目前奥运会期间的体育纠纷都是由国际体育仲裁院(CAS)特别仲裁机构的快速仲裁机制解决的,2008年北京奥运会亦不例外。《奥林匹克宪章》第59条明确了CAS特别仲裁机构对奥运会期间体育纠纷的排他性管辖权,所有参加奥运会的运动员、教练员、裁判员所填写的参赛报名表中,都包含了接受CAS专属管辖权的强制性仲裁条款。北京奥运会CAS特别仲裁实践维护了体育法的一些基本原则,如禁止反言原则、保护运动员参赛权利原则、技术事项不予审查原则等。中国最高司法机关对CAS北京特别仲裁机制的运作明确表示了支持。

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As the disadvantages in the litigation settlement of sports disputes, all the sports disputes arising from the Olympic Games now are settled by the special fast track arbitration mechanism of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Article 59 of the Olympic Charter provides the exclusive jurisdiction of the CAS Olympic Games ad hoc Division to the sports disputes during the Olympic Games, while all the athletes, trainers and referees need to sign an entrance form which includes a mandatory clause to accept the exclusive jurisdiction of CAS. The special sports arbitration practice in the Beijing Olympic Games upholds the general principles of sports law, such as the estoppel, protect of sports rights of athletes, non review of the technical issues, etc. The supreme judicial organ of China expressed its supports to the operation of the CAS Beijing Olympic Games ad hoc Division.
      번역하기

      As the disadvantages in the litigation settlement of sports disputes, all the sports disputes arising from the Olympic Games now are settled by the special fast track arbitration mechanism of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as in the...

      As the disadvantages in the litigation settlement of sports disputes, all the sports disputes arising from the Olympic Games now are settled by the special fast track arbitration mechanism of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Article 59 of the Olympic Charter provides the exclusive jurisdiction of the CAS Olympic Games ad hoc Division to the sports disputes during the Olympic Games, while all the athletes, trainers and referees need to sign an entrance form which includes a mandatory clause to accept the exclusive jurisdiction of CAS. The special sports arbitration practice in the Beijing Olympic Games upholds the general principles of sports law, such as the estoppel, protect of sports rights of athletes, non review of the technical issues, etc. The supreme judicial organ of China expressed its supports to the operation of the CAS Beijing Olympic Games ad hoc Division.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 黄世席, "奥运会争议仲裁" 法律出版社 2006

      2 黄世席, "奥林匹克赛事争议与仲裁" 法律出版社 2005

      3 奥林匹克委员会, "奥林匹克宪章" 奥林匹克出版社 2001

      4 郭树理, "体育纠纷的多元化救济机制探讨—比较法与国际法的视野" 法律出版社 2004

      5 米歇尔, "体育法" 武汉大学出版社 2008

      6 BLACKSHAW, SIEKMANN, "The Court of Arbitration for Sport 1984‐2004" T.M.C.Asser Press 2005

      7 SIMON GARDINER, "Sports Law" Cavendish Publishing 2006

      8 JAMES A.R.NAFZIGER, "International Sports Law" Transnational Publishers 2004

      9 MATTHIEU REEB, "Digest of CAS Awards 1998‐2000, 2002‐2004" Kluwer Law International 2004

      10 ABRIELLE KAUFMANN‐KOHLER, "Arbitration at the Olympics: Issues of fast‐track dispute resolution and sports law" Kluwer Law International 2001

      1 黄世席, "奥运会争议仲裁" 法律出版社 2006

      2 黄世席, "奥林匹克赛事争议与仲裁" 法律出版社 2005

      3 奥林匹克委员会, "奥林匹克宪章" 奥林匹克出版社 2001

      4 郭树理, "体育纠纷的多元化救济机制探讨—比较法与国际法的视野" 法律出版社 2004

      5 米歇尔, "体育法" 武汉大学出版社 2008

      6 BLACKSHAW, SIEKMANN, "The Court of Arbitration for Sport 1984‐2004" T.M.C.Asser Press 2005

      7 SIMON GARDINER, "Sports Law" Cavendish Publishing 2006

      8 JAMES A.R.NAFZIGER, "International Sports Law" Transnational Publishers 2004

      9 MATTHIEU REEB, "Digest of CAS Awards 1998‐2000, 2002‐2004" Kluwer Law International 2004

      10 ABRIELLE KAUFMANN‐KOHLER, "Arbitration at the Olympics: Issues of fast‐track dispute resolution and sports law" Kluwer Law International 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-06-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 스포츠와 법 -> 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법 KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-09-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국스포츠법학회 -> 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
      영문명 : The Korean Association Of Sports Law -> The Korean Association of Sports & Entertainment Law
      KCI등재후보
      2007-09-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Sports and Law -> The Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.7
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.78 0.741 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼