RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    초등학교 언어 영재 아동과 일반 아동의 언어적 창의성 발달에 관한 연구 = A Study for Developmental Differences of Verbal Creativity of the Verbally Gifted and the Regular Students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057680

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study explored to find developmental differences of verbal creativity of the verbally gifted and regular students. Thus, two questions were investigated. First, as the grades of the verbally gifted and regular students go up, is divergent thinking of them developed? Second, as the grades of the verbally gifted and regular students go up, is convergent thinking of them developed? Original participants in this study consisted of 720 students(grade of 2nd, 4th and 6th) who were draw from three elementary schools in Busan, Korea. Finally, the 120 students, including 60 the verbally gifted and 60 regular students, were selected through IQ, verbal fluency grades, and teachers` nomination. Then, 120 students` writing were analyzed into divergent thinking and convergent thinking. The results of this study were as follow: According to the result of two-way ANOVA analysis, the higher grade in the verbally gifted and the regular, the more significant improvement is in divergent thinking and convergent thinking. But there were significant differences in verbal creativity between 2nd grade and 6th grade, and between 4th grade and 6th grade in post hoc results, whereas there were no differences of divergent and convergent thinking between 2nd grade and 4th grade. And the verbally gifted showed the higher level of verbal creativity in writing than the regular.
    번역하기

    This study explored to find developmental differences of verbal creativity of the verbally gifted and regular students. Thus, two questions were investigated. First, as the grades of the verbally gifted and regular students go up, is divergent thinkin...

    This study explored to find developmental differences of verbal creativity of the verbally gifted and regular students. Thus, two questions were investigated. First, as the grades of the verbally gifted and regular students go up, is divergent thinking of them developed? Second, as the grades of the verbally gifted and regular students go up, is convergent thinking of them developed? Original participants in this study consisted of 720 students(grade of 2nd, 4th and 6th) who were draw from three elementary schools in Busan, Korea. Finally, the 120 students, including 60 the verbally gifted and 60 regular students, were selected through IQ, verbal fluency grades, and teachers` nomination. Then, 120 students` writing were analyzed into divergent thinking and convergent thinking. The results of this study were as follow: According to the result of two-way ANOVA analysis, the higher grade in the verbally gifted and the regular, the more significant improvement is in divergent thinking and convergent thinking. But there were significant differences in verbal creativity between 2nd grade and 6th grade, and between 4th grade and 6th grade in post hoc results, whereas there were no differences of divergent and convergent thinking between 2nd grade and 4th grade. And the verbally gifted showed the higher level of verbal creativity in writing than the regular.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼