RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신용장거래에 있어서 Fraud Rule의 적용범위에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Application Scope of Fraud Rule in Letters of Credit

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76518466

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The fraud rule in the law governing letters of credit is a developing area. Sztejn is the landmark case in the course of the development of the fraud rule in the law of letters of credit. It has not only been codified in the UCC but also has been cited with approval outside the United States throughout the common law world. Nowadays unlike the ICC rules, the UNCITRAL Convention have provided the fraud rule.
    A letter of credit transaction is a multi-transaction arrangement. So when a letter of credit fraud case comes before a court, this raises the question of where attention may be directed in determining whether or not fraud is involved. There are controversy in the application of fraud rule. The purpose of this paper is to analysis the scope of locus the fraud rule. At first the controversy in the United States came from the confusion caused by different interpretation of the previous version of UCC Article 5, s5-114(2). But this controversy was resolved by the revised UCC Article 5 which included fraud in the underlying transaction within the scope of fraud under fraud rule. The purpose of this paper is to study about the application scope of the fraud rule in international trade by letters credit.
    번역하기

    The fraud rule in the law governing letters of credit is a developing area. Sztejn is the landmark case in the course of the development of the fraud rule in the law of letters of credit. It has not only been codified in the UCC but also has been cite...

    The fraud rule in the law governing letters of credit is a developing area. Sztejn is the landmark case in the course of the development of the fraud rule in the law of letters of credit. It has not only been codified in the UCC but also has been cited with approval outside the United States throughout the common law world. Nowadays unlike the ICC rules, the UNCITRAL Convention have provided the fraud rule.
    A letter of credit transaction is a multi-transaction arrangement. So when a letter of credit fraud case comes before a court, this raises the question of where attention may be directed in determining whether or not fraud is involved. There are controversy in the application of fraud rule. The purpose of this paper is to analysis the scope of locus the fraud rule. At first the controversy in the United States came from the confusion caused by different interpretation of the previous version of UCC Article 5, s5-114(2). But this controversy was resolved by the revised UCC Article 5 which included fraud in the underlying transaction within the scope of fraud under fraud rule. The purpose of this paper is to study about the application scope of the fraud rule in international trade by letters credit.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. Fraud Rule의 준거법규
    • Ⅲ. Fraud Rule의 적용범위에 관한 논쟁
    • Ⅳ. 수익자외 당사자의 사기
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. Fraud Rule의 준거법규
    • Ⅲ. Fraud Rule의 적용범위에 관한 논쟁
    • Ⅳ. 수익자외 당사자의 사기
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 오원석, "화환신용장에서 사기제외법칙의 근거와 적용기준" 수출보험학회 2003

    2 이대우, "화환신용장거래에 있어서 지급거절에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 대학원 1992

    3 양정호, "신용장거래에서의 사기관련 한미사례 검토" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 199-222, 2005

    4 유중원, "신용장-법과 관습(상)" 청림출판 2007

    5 김선국, "보증신용장의 법적문제에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 1991

    6 유중원, "국제무역과 판례" 청림출판 2005

    7 오원석, "貨煥信用狀에서 詐欺除外法則(Fraud Exception Rule)이 개설신청인이나 제3당사자의 사기에도 적용되는가?" 한국무역학회 29 (29): 203-224, 2004

    8 Comment, "“Fraud in the Transaction”: Enjoining Letters of Credit during the Iranian Revolution" 93 : 1980

    9 White & Summers, "Uniform Commercial Code"

    10 Goode, R. M, "The New ICC Uniform Rules of Demand Guarantee" 1992

    1 오원석, "화환신용장에서 사기제외법칙의 근거와 적용기준" 수출보험학회 2003

    2 이대우, "화환신용장거래에 있어서 지급거절에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 대학원 1992

    3 양정호, "신용장거래에서의 사기관련 한미사례 검토" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 199-222, 2005

    4 유중원, "신용장-법과 관습(상)" 청림출판 2007

    5 김선국, "보증신용장의 법적문제에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 1991

    6 유중원, "국제무역과 판례" 청림출판 2005

    7 오원석, "貨煥信用狀에서 詐欺除外法則(Fraud Exception Rule)이 개설신청인이나 제3당사자의 사기에도 적용되는가?" 한국무역학회 29 (29): 203-224, 2004

    8 Comment, "“Fraud in the Transaction”: Enjoining Letters of Credit during the Iranian Revolution" 93 : 1980

    9 White & Summers, "Uniform Commercial Code"

    10 Goode, R. M, "The New ICC Uniform Rules of Demand Guarantee" 1992

    11 Dolan, J. F, "The Law of Letters of Credit: Commercial and Standby Credit" Warren, Gorham & Lamont 1996

    12 Hans Van Houtte, "The Law of International Trade" Sweet & Maxwell 1995

    13 Clark, B, "The Law of Bank Deposits Collections and Credit Cards"

    14 Davis, A, G, "The Law Relating to Commercial Letter of Credit" 3rd Sir Issac Pitman Ltd 1963

    15 Xiang Gao, "The Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit - A Comparative Study"

    16 Megrah, M, "Risk Aspects of the Irrevocable Documentary Credit" 24 : 1982

    17 Tuner, P. S, "Revised UCC Article 5: The New UC Uniform Law on Letters of Credit"

    18 Symons, E. L, "Letter of Credit: Fraud, Good Faith and the Basis for Injunctive Relief" 54 : 1980

    19 Fellinger, G. A, "Letter of Credit : The Autonomy Principle and the Fraud Exception"

    20 ICC, "ICC Opinions of the ICC Banking Commission"

    21 ICC, "ICC Opinions of the ICC Banking Commission"

    22 Gets, H. A, "Enjoining the International Standby Letter of Credit : The Iranian, Letter of Credit Cases" 21 : 1980

    23 Harfield, H, "Enjoining Letter of Credit Transactions"

    24 Raymond, J, "Documentary Credits"

    25 "An Examination of UCC Article 5(Letter of Credit)"

    26 Benjamin, A. B, ""Sale of Goods" the Common Law Library" Sweet & Maxwell 1981

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 0.93
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.92 0.87 1.057 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼