不動産登記의 公信力에 관한 硏究 = (A) Study on public reliability of real estate registration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korean civil law, while public reliability on pos session which notifies per sonal estate right publicity is recognized, there is no expressed regulation whether public reliability on real est ate registration which notifies real est ate right publicly is recognized. However, generally agreed theory and judicial practice say that public reliability is not recognizes.
When Korean civil law was est ablished, the demand for public reliability on real estate registration was not so high. Because the necessity for safe transaction and moment ary circulation, that is the necessity for mortage circulation due to economic growth has been highly increased since then, it becomes a hot issue of legislation theory whether public reliability on real est ate registration should be recognized in order to seek circulation guarantee of mortage right and the safety of real est ate transaction.
In case of German, Swiss, and T orrens system in America,
public reliability on real estate registration is recognized. In France, it is not recognized, however, the safety of transaction is protected through not arizing source certificates and, as a result, it has the same effect that public reliability is recognizes. In Japan, public reliability on real estate registration is not recognizes but Japanese civil law supplement this weak point by introducing theories like analogical application in Article 94 Clause 2.
But, Korean Civil Law does not give registration officers practical inspection authority, nor adopt not ary public system for source certificates and has problems with registration book and ledger. In short, registration system is so cripply operated that there is high chances of false registration. Of course, current law has regulation on third party protection in case of realest ate right transaction, but, which is only a tempor ary remedy. Besides Korean civil law is totally powerless regarding to circulation guarantee of mortgage right.
Here active countermeasure is required to secure the safety of real estate transaction and circulation guarantee of mortgage right. Fundamental solution is to recognize public reliability on real estate registration. But if public reliability on real estate registration is recognized, the safety of transaction and circulation og mortgage right are guaranteed, but real rightful person loses his own right. Especially under current law which has high chance of false registration, the damage will be severe.
So the system should be improved first to protect real rightful person by improving registration and ledger system, giving registration officers practical inspection authority, adopting registration source certificate and minimizing false registration.
In conclusion, it is desirable to seek the safety of transaction and the circulation guarantee of mortgage right by recognizing public reliability on real estate registration on condition that system is improved.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 方法및 範圍 = 3
• 第2章 登記의 公信力에 관 한 基礎理論과 各國의 立法例 = 4
• 第1節 序說 = 4
• 第2節 公信의 原則의 沿革 = 5
• 第3節 公示의 原則과 公信의 原則 = 6
• I. 公示의 原則 = 6
• II. 公信의 原則 = 7
• III. 兩原則의 關係 = 8
• 第4節 各國의 立法例 = 10
• I. 不動産登記의 公信力을 認定하는 立法例 = 10
• 1. 獨逸 = 10
• 2. 스위스 = 13
• 3. 美國 = 15
• II. 不動産登記의 公信力을 否定하는 立法例 = 20
• 1. 프랑스 = 20
• 2. 日本 = 22
• III. 立法例의 比較 = 23
• 第3章 우리나라의 不動産 登記制度 = 26
• 第1節 우리나라의 不動産 登記制度와 登記의 效力 = 26
• I. 우리나라의 不動産 登記制度 = 26
• 1. 沿革 = 26
• 2. 法源 = 29
• 3. 登記簿 = 30
• 4. 登記公務員의 審査權 = 30
• 5. 登記節次 = 31
• II. 登記의 效力 = 32
• 第2節 不實登記 = 34
• I. 不實登記의 槪念 = 34
• II. 不實登記가 되는 경우 = 35
• 1. 實體的 權利關係에 附合하지 않는 登記 = 35
• 2. 原因無效登記 = 36
• III. 不實登記에 대한 信賴者 保護制度 = 47
• 1. 公信力의 認定與否 = 47
• 2. 物權行爲의 無因論 = 48
• 3. 善意의 第3者 保護規定 = 48
• 4. 解除의 效果와 第3者의 權利 = 49
• 5. 取得時效 = 50
• 6. 債權法的 救濟 = 52
• 7. 通情虛僞表示規定의 類推解釋論 = 54
• 第4章 公信力 認定을 위한 不動産登記制度의 改善方案 = 57
• 第1節 序說 = 57
• 第2節 不動産登記制度의 問題點 = 58
• I. 登記簿와 臺帳 = 58
• II. 登記公務員의 審査權 = 58
• III. 登記主義 = 59
• 1. 實體法上의 原因 = 60
• 2. 建物登記의 問題點 = 60
• 3. 稅法上의 原因 = 61
• 4. 登記申請主義 = 61
• 第3節 不動産登記制度의 改善方案 = 63
• I. 臺帳의 整備 = 63
• II. 登記公務員의 實質的審査權 = 64
• III. 登記原因의 公證制度 = 65
• 1. 公證制度에 대한 反對見解 = 65
• 2. 公證對象 = 67
• 3. 公證範圍 = 69
• 4. 公證의 方式과 效力 = 70
• 5. 公證人의 資格 = 71
• IV. 登記訂正請求權 및 그 保全 = 72
• V. 補償制度 = 73
• VI. 登記强制主義 = 74
• VII. 登記의 推定力 = 74
• VIII. 經過措置 = 74
• 第5章 結論 = 76
• SUMMARY = 78
• 參考文獻 = 80