RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      地域開發의 理論的 接近 II = Theoretical Approach to Regional Development II

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19657305

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There are two sources of regional development theories; one is diffusion theory, the other is dependencia. Diffusion theory explains that innovation diffusion takes the role of development, and the mechanism of innovation diffusion will achieve prosperity of lagging region in a spatial system in a nation. Urban centers of the nation will spin off innovations to peripheral area. They believe that development process will follow stage and cycle as the manner of the innovation diffusion. However less developed countries still stay in poor status, because LDCs do not yet gear in an appropriate stage of development. In order to speed up development in LDCs, they emphasize to interact with more developed countries. In the spatial organization, urban centers are responsible for spreading the innovation diffusion to peripheral regions.
      However, empirical researches do not support that the mechanism of innovation diffusion brings about development in lagging regions, and moreover the mechanism has increased disparities between urban centers and rural areas. Growth center theory is known a device to curb the growth of primate city and to stimulate ba1anced development by means of allocation of propulsive units such as institutions, plants, and industrial complexes in the lagging region.
      The growth pole policy is abandoned by LBCs, because the growth pole did not carry out the role of spread effects to the periphery.
      Dependencia has examined why poor countries stay in poor and rich countries in rich. That is, the rich countries exploit poor peripheral countries in a mechanisn of world market economies. In this context, LDCs inevitably depends upon more developed countries, consequently developed countries have continued their dominance in a relationship with less developed countries, and do not release worthy innovations to peripheral countries. Therefore, they criticize that the more developed countries or regions in a spatial organization remain a dominant situation, and center-periphery relationship perpetuates as time goes by. However, dependecia can not explain regional growth as well as national growth such as Taiwan and Korea which both countries heavily depend on Japan and United States in the world market system.
      Both Diffusion and dependencia theories argue one side of development sets, but did not look into whole sets of mechanism of development. Regional development of peripheral region should be approached by both perspectives alternatively. It implies that measures of market mechanism and government interferences are required simultaneously to carry out successful development. Future research in this field is asked to develope a new model of governmental interference in the market system.
      번역하기

      There are two sources of regional development theories; one is diffusion theory, the other is dependencia. Diffusion theory explains that innovation diffusion takes the role of development, and the mechanism of innovation diffusion will achieve prospe...

      There are two sources of regional development theories; one is diffusion theory, the other is dependencia. Diffusion theory explains that innovation diffusion takes the role of development, and the mechanism of innovation diffusion will achieve prosperity of lagging region in a spatial system in a nation. Urban centers of the nation will spin off innovations to peripheral area. They believe that development process will follow stage and cycle as the manner of the innovation diffusion. However less developed countries still stay in poor status, because LDCs do not yet gear in an appropriate stage of development. In order to speed up development in LDCs, they emphasize to interact with more developed countries. In the spatial organization, urban centers are responsible for spreading the innovation diffusion to peripheral regions.
      However, empirical researches do not support that the mechanism of innovation diffusion brings about development in lagging regions, and moreover the mechanism has increased disparities between urban centers and rural areas. Growth center theory is known a device to curb the growth of primate city and to stimulate ba1anced development by means of allocation of propulsive units such as institutions, plants, and industrial complexes in the lagging region.
      The growth pole policy is abandoned by LBCs, because the growth pole did not carry out the role of spread effects to the periphery.
      Dependencia has examined why poor countries stay in poor and rich countries in rich. That is, the rich countries exploit poor peripheral countries in a mechanisn of world market economies. In this context, LDCs inevitably depends upon more developed countries, consequently developed countries have continued their dominance in a relationship with less developed countries, and do not release worthy innovations to peripheral countries. Therefore, they criticize that the more developed countries or regions in a spatial organization remain a dominant situation, and center-periphery relationship perpetuates as time goes by. However, dependecia can not explain regional growth as well as national growth such as Taiwan and Korea which both countries heavily depend on Japan and United States in the world market system.
      Both Diffusion and dependencia theories argue one side of development sets, but did not look into whole sets of mechanism of development. Regional development of peripheral region should be approached by both perspectives alternatively. It implies that measures of market mechanism and government interferences are required simultaneously to carry out successful development. Future research in this field is asked to develope a new model of governmental interference in the market system.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 硏究意義
      • Ⅱ. 發展의 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 都市 中心 發展理論
      • Ⅳ. 發展의 格差
      • Ⅴ. 中心과 周邊의 關係 論
      • Ⅰ. 硏究意義
      • Ⅱ. 發展의 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 都市 中心 發展理論
      • Ⅳ. 發展의 格差
      • Ⅴ. 中心과 周邊의 關係 論
      • Ⅵ. Growth Pole 論
      • Ⅶ. Dependencia 論
      • Ⅷ. 結言
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼