공공갈등과 거버넌스 그리고 제도변화:물관리 일원화의 성과와 과제 = Transboundary Water Conflict, Governance, and Institutional Change: Achievements and Challenges of Unifying Water Management

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Due to the nature of water conflict that goes through several administrative districts, the key to the success of water governance lies in public conflict management, and how to reach consensus is a key issue, and the purpose of this study is to solve this issue.
Although an institutional foundation was provided through the enactment of the Framework Act on Water Management and the revision of the Government Organization Act in May 2018, it was found that governance was not actually working due to various limitations of the Water Management Committee. First, among 12 experts, 58.3% disagreed with the statement that ‘conflicts over water have been alleviated since the unification of water management in 2018’ in Korea. Second, 83.3% of the respondents thought that the governance of Korea's National Water Management Committee was not contributing to resolving water conflicts, with the majority giving a negative evaluation. And 75% of experts thought that the governance of Korea's Four Major Rivers Basin Water Management Committee is not contributing to resolving water-related conflicts. Third, because 41.6% of experts did not agree with the opinion that the level of institutional arrangements for water-related conflict management in Korea was high, the negative evaluation was higher than the positive evaluation. Fourth, when asked what institutional measures they thought were desirable in resolving water-related conflicts, the use of the Framework Act on Water Management was evaluated as the most appropriate legal system plan. In relation to water conflict, the mediation method including the formation of a mediation council was evaluated as the most appropriate for conflict management and resolution methods by conflict type.
From the perspective of path creation, changes in water management policy and governance were observed since 2018, but it was confirmed that operational limitations were still encountered. Furthermore, the failure to enact the Framework Act on Conflict Management in Korea was seen since 2005 from the perspective of historical institutionalism and path dependence. And since there are experts who argue for the use of the existing system, we have come to the conclusion that it is necessary to gradually improve the system while preserving the operational excellence.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Dutch Association of Water Boards, 2003

2 환경부, "환경백서" 2023

3 정정길, "행정학의 새로운 이해" 대명출판사 2003

4 김준기 ; 이민호, "한국의 네트워크 거버넌스에 관한 연구 : 사회복지관의 네트워크와 조직 효과성" 44 (44): 91-126, 2006

5 하연섭, "제도분석 : 이론과 쟁점" 다산출판사 2003

6 환경부, "제2차 물환경관리기본계획(2016∼2025)" 2015

7 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 1997

8 환경부(영산강홍수통제소, 영산강유역환경청), "영산강･섬진강 유역 가뭄백서(2022~2023)" 2023

9 김진수, "물관리일원화 후속조치 현황 및 향후 과제" 국회입법조사처 2021

10 김철회, "물 관리 행정체계, 왜 변하지 않는가? : Mahoney의 자기강화모형 관점에서" 51 (51): 167-194, 2013

11 류형철, "대구시 공공갈등관리 개선방안 연구" 대구경북연구원 2019

12 김창수, "다층적 물관리 거버넌스 격차측정과 갈등관리 : 물관리 전문가들의 인식과 비판" 28 (28): 385-409, 2024

13 김창수, "네덜란드 물거버넌스 분석" 25 (25): 211-235, 2018

14 낙동강유역물관리위원회, "낙동강유역 물관리종합계획 주요내용"

15 고상근, "낙동강수계 물관리 및 주민지원 등에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안 검토보고"

16 이승환, "국가물관리위원회 쟁점 및 개선방안 연구: 위원회 법적 성격, 전문성, 독립성, 정책조정 기능을 중심으로" 19 (19): 103-136, 2023

17 은재호, "공론화의 이론과 실제: 건강한 공론형성과 진단을 위한 길라잡이" 박영사 2022

18 이용곤, "공공기관의 갈등 예방 및 해결에 관한 법률안 검토 보고"

19 대통령자문 지속가능발전위원회, "공공갈등관리의 이론과 기법(하)" 논형 2005

20 김창수, "경로의존성과 딜레마 그리고 입법실패 : 물기본법 제정지연 사례의 분석" 20 (20): 135-159, 2016

21 이용곤, "갈등관리기본법안 검토 보고"

22 이용곤, "갈등관리기본법안 검토 보고"

23 Dutch Water Authorities, "Water Governance: The Dutch Water Authority Model" Opmeer BV 2017

24 OECD, "Water Governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the Future?" OECD 2014

25 OECD, "Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach" OECD 2011

26 Rhodes, R. W., "The New Governance : Governing Without Government" 44 (44): 652-667, 1996

27 Acemoglu, Daron, "The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty" Penguin Books 2020

28 Havekes, Herman, "The Governance and Finance Structure of Dutch Water Management"

29 Krasner, S., "Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective" 21 (21): 66-94, 1988

30 Hall, Peter A., "Political Science & the Three New Institutionalism" 44 : 936-957, 1996

31 Sabatier, P. A., "Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach" Westview Press 1993

32 Charbit, Claire, "Mind the Gaps: Managing Mutual Dependence in Relations among Levels of Government" OECD 2009

33 Giordanoa, Mark, "From IWRM back to integrated water resources management" 30 (30): 364-376, 2014

34 Vaughn, Sharon, "Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology" SAGE Publications, Inc 1996

35 Rogers, P., "Effective Water Governance" 2003

36 Dutch Water Authorities, "Dutch Regional Water Authorities"

37 Ikenberry, G. John, "Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy" 42 (42): 219-243, 1988

38 International Office for Water, "Capacity building for better water management: Organization of water management in France"

39 Havekes, Herman, "Building Blocks for Good Water Governance" Water Governance Centre 2016

40 UNDP Water Governance Facility, "Anti-Corruption in the Water Sector"

41 Sabatier, P. A., "An Advocacy Coalition Model of Policy Change and the Role of Policy Oriented Learning Therein" 21 : 129-168, 1988

42 김창수, "4대강 사업의 경로의존성과 낙동강 보 해체와 개방을 둘러싼 딜레마" 25 (25): 245-268, 2021