RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대화에서 격률과 함축, 그리고 그 교육적 의미

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101746098

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this study is to explain implication occurring in conversation and to suggest the orientation of its teaching. Today, specially learning of speaking-listening in Korean language education follows Grice`s 4 maxims as important rules. Grice described these expectations in terms of a Co-operative Principle and maxims of Quality (truthfulness), Quantity (informativeness), Relation (relevance) and Manner (clarity) which speakers are expected to observe(Grice 1961). But Grice`s theories have the meaning to explain the implications when they very often occur in everyday-conversation. The interpretation a rational hearer should choose is the one that best satisfies those expectations. The goal of inferential pragmatics is to explain how the hearer infers the speaker`s meaning on the basis of the evidence provided. And implication theory is connected with Sperber & Wilson`s the relevance theories. They share Grice`s intuition that utterances raise expectations of relevance, including the need for a Co-operative Principle and maxims, the focus on pragmatic processes which contribute to implicatures rather than to explicit, truth-conditional content, and the treatment of figurative utterances as deviations from a maxim or convention of truthfulness. In the education of conversation, it is important that students know maxims as the mechanism of implication but in itself.
    번역하기

    The aim of this study is to explain implication occurring in conversation and to suggest the orientation of its teaching. Today, specially learning of speaking-listening in Korean language education follows Grice`s 4 maxims as important rules. Grice d...

    The aim of this study is to explain implication occurring in conversation and to suggest the orientation of its teaching. Today, specially learning of speaking-listening in Korean language education follows Grice`s 4 maxims as important rules. Grice described these expectations in terms of a Co-operative Principle and maxims of Quality (truthfulness), Quantity (informativeness), Relation (relevance) and Manner (clarity) which speakers are expected to observe(Grice 1961). But Grice`s theories have the meaning to explain the implications when they very often occur in everyday-conversation. The interpretation a rational hearer should choose is the one that best satisfies those expectations. The goal of inferential pragmatics is to explain how the hearer infers the speaker`s meaning on the basis of the evidence provided. And implication theory is connected with Sperber & Wilson`s the relevance theories. They share Grice`s intuition that utterances raise expectations of relevance, including the need for a Co-operative Principle and maxims, the focus on pragmatic processes which contribute to implicatures rather than to explicit, truth-conditional content, and the treatment of figurative utterances as deviations from a maxim or convention of truthfulness. In the education of conversation, it is important that students know maxims as the mechanism of implication but in itself.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이성범, "화용론연구" 태학사 2002

    2 이성범, "화용론개관" 한신문화사 2007

    3 최재호, "화용론 백과사전" 한국문화사 2004

    4 이익환, "화용론" 한신문화사 1991

    5 이성범, "추론의 화용론" 한국문화사 2001

    6 김상희, "관여성 이론에 의한 함축의미의 화용적 해석" 30 (30): 735-752, 1995

    7 강미경, "관련성 원리에 입각한 대화함축과 맥락함축" 16 (16): 5-22, 2000

    8 Gordon D., "conversational postulates, In Syntax and Semantics 3 : Speech Acts" Academic Press 83-106, 1975

    9 Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" Blackwell 1986

    10 Levinson,S.C., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" MIT Press 2000

    1 이성범, "화용론연구" 태학사 2002

    2 이성범, "화용론개관" 한신문화사 2007

    3 최재호, "화용론 백과사전" 한국문화사 2004

    4 이익환, "화용론" 한신문화사 1991

    5 이성범, "추론의 화용론" 한국문화사 2001

    6 김상희, "관여성 이론에 의한 함축의미의 화용적 해석" 30 (30): 735-752, 1995

    7 강미경, "관련성 원리에 입각한 대화함축과 맥락함축" 16 (16): 5-22, 2000

    8 Gordon D., "conversational postulates, In Syntax and Semantics 3 : Speech Acts" Academic Press 83-106, 1975

    9 Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" Blackwell 1986

    10 Levinson,S.C., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" MIT Press 2000

    11 Levinson, S.C., "Pragmatics" Cambridge University Press 1983

    12 Sperber, D., "Mutual Knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension, In Mutual Knowledge" Academic Press 61-85, 1982

    13 Levinson, S.C., "Minimization and conversational inference, In The Pragmatic Perspective, Amsterdam" John Benjamins 61-129, 1987

    14 Grice, H.P., "Logic and conversation, In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts" Academic Press 83-106, 1975

    15 Grice, H.P., "Further notes on logic and conversation, In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics" Academic Press 113-127, 1975

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-03-18 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Textlinguistics KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.73 0.8 1.197 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼