다문화가족지원사업 민간위탁방식의 개선방안 = Improvement of the private consignment method of multicultural family business outsourcing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The current Multicultural Families Support Act stipulates that the majority of multicultural family support programs are to be implemented by Multicultural Family Support Centers or private organizations. The national or local governments establish these centers, which are then operated through private consignment by specialized institutions such as corporations or organizations.
However, the existing Multicultural Families Support Act and related municipal ordinances lack sufficient legal provisions regarding private consignment. Particularly, there are inadequate regulations concerning the selection criteria for consignees, evaluation procedures, and post-selection management and supervision. This has led to various issues related to private consignment.
To address these problems, it is imperative to enhance the transparency of the selection process for private consignees. As an alternative, we propose adopting the sealed bid contract award system used in the United States. In the U.S., the selection of contractors for private consignment involves evaluating technical proposals, followed by price proposals from shortlisted applicants. The final contractor is chosen after discussions with all proposers within the competitive range.
Furthermore, the qualification requirements for members of the consignee selection committee should be expanded. Multicultural Family Centers are institutions that carry out multicultural family support projects as mandated by law. Therefore, evaluating the project implementation capacity fundamentally requires expertise and experience in multicultural family issues. We propose including multicultural society experts who have completed the legal training specified by the Minister of Justice as eligible committee members. Additionally, we suggest including supervisors in the committee to assess the adequacy of multicultural family support project operational plans.
To protect existing corporations or private organizations operating Multicultural Centers, we recommend explicitly stating re-contracting provisions in multicultural family-related ordinances. Specifically, we propose amending the current re-contracting clause from when the mayor deems necessary to when performance evaluation results are exceptionally outstanding or when there are no other private organizations capable of implementing multicultural family support projects.
Lastly, to concretize the local government head's authority to guide and supervise Multicultural Family Centers, we propose directly and sufficiently stipulating this authority in the Multicultural Families Support Act or related municipal ordinances.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조한상, "현행 비영리민간단체지원법의 헌법적 의미와 문제점, 개선방안에 관한 고찰" (24) : 2007

2 최철호, "행정권한의 민간위탁에 관한 법적기준의 설정과 한계" 2008

3 김태훈 ; 김은희, "토픽모델링(LDA)을 활용한 다문화가족지원센터 연구동향 분석" (43) : 2023

4 홍정선, "지방자치법상 민간위탁의 개념: 행정실무상 유사개념과의 비교를 중심으로" 13 (13): 2013

5 문상덕, "지방자치단체의 노인복지사무 민간위탁의 현황과 법적 통제" 행정법이론실무학회 (23) : 2009

6 최병근, "지방자치단체 사회복지시설의 민간위탁 현황 및 개선과제" 국회입법조사처 2020

7 최무현, "주요국가 민간위탁 운영 현황 및 사례분석 최종 보고서" 한국행정학회 2021

8 최연실, "인구통계자료에 나타난 한국인 국제결혼의 사회인구학적 특성 분석" 26 (26): 2008

9 고경훈, "비영리민간단체 지원체계 및 제도개선" 한국지방행정연구원 2015

10 김준기, "비영리단체(NPOs)의 생성과 일반적 행태: -주인-대리인이론 관점에서-" 36 (36): 1998

11 강인성 ; 김건위 ; 이병기 ; 류영아, "방자치단체 민간위탁의 실태와 성과만족도 분석에 관한 연구" 국지방자치학회 21 (21): 2009

12 정명임, "민간위탁관련 법제의 문제점에 관한 연구" 6 (6): 2017

13 주성훈, "다문화가족지원사업 문제과 개선과제" 국회예산정책처 2010

14 윤향희 ; 김경제, "「다문화가족지원법」의 개선방안" 21 (21): 2024