RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    주거용 건축물의 녹색건축 인증 취득 현황 및 개선 방향 : 2016년~2023년 인증현황을 중심으로 = G-SEED Certification Status and Improvement Strategies for Residential Buildings: Focusing on 2016 to 2023 Trends

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109473763

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, we analyzed the certification status and scoring trends of residential buildings— particularly multi-residential and general housing—that received Green Standard Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification between 2016 and 2023. The study aimed to identify trends and areas for improvement within the certification system. Certification status was analyzed across multiple factors, including year, rating, region, certification version, number of units, and public/private classification. Certification scores were reviewed by final grade as well as by scores in specialized fields. The findings revealed the characteristics and trends in the evaluation of residential buildings under the G-SEED system. First, most certifications were at the [Green 4] level, with a notably low rate of [Green 1] certifications, suggesting a need for enhanced design and technical support, as well as stronger incentives. Second, the certification data showed that certified buildings were concentrated primarily in the metropolitan area, highlighting the need for regional cooperation and locally tailored policies to promote green building certification in other regions. Third, a higher proportion of certified buildings in the private sector compared with those in public sector indicated a rising interest and demand for green construction within the private sector, suggesting that policy support and tax incentives could further encourage participation. Lastly, an analysis of specialized fields revealed that the “5. Maintenance” category contributed significantly to overall scores, suggesting the need for differentiated approach and adjustments to difficulty levels for this category in future G-SEED updates.
    번역하기

    In this study, we analyzed the certification status and scoring trends of residential buildings— particularly multi-residential and general housing—that received Green Standard Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification between 2016 an...

    In this study, we analyzed the certification status and scoring trends of residential buildings— particularly multi-residential and general housing—that received Green Standard Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification between 2016 and 2023. The study aimed to identify trends and areas for improvement within the certification system. Certification status was analyzed across multiple factors, including year, rating, region, certification version, number of units, and public/private classification. Certification scores were reviewed by final grade as well as by scores in specialized fields. The findings revealed the characteristics and trends in the evaluation of residential buildings under the G-SEED system. First, most certifications were at the [Green 4] level, with a notably low rate of [Green 1] certifications, suggesting a need for enhanced design and technical support, as well as stronger incentives. Second, the certification data showed that certified buildings were concentrated primarily in the metropolitan area, highlighting the need for regional cooperation and locally tailored policies to promote green building certification in other regions. Third, a higher proportion of certified buildings in the private sector compared with those in public sector indicated a rising interest and demand for green construction within the private sector, suggesting that policy support and tax incentives could further encourage participation. Lastly, an analysis of specialized fields revealed that the “5. Maintenance” category contributed significantly to overall scores, suggesting the need for differentiated approach and adjustments to difficulty levels for this category in future G-SEED updates.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 명일 ; 윤혜경, "The Analysis of Evaluation Items in the Indoor Environment Performance Field in G-SEED-Focusing on Indoor Air Quality in Residential Building" 39 (39): 217-224, 2023

    2 김경하 ; 김용현, "Study of the Improvement plans of related to Environmental Factors(E) of ESG" 27 : 55-90, 2021

    3 배채영 ; 장대희, "Proposal on the Improvement of Grading and Planting Type Scoring Standards for Biotope Area Ratio in the G-Seed" 23 (23): 107-112, 2023

    4 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-7"

    5 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-6"

    6 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-5"

    7 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-4"

    8 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-3"

    9 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-2"

    10 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016"

    1 명일 ; 윤혜경, "The Analysis of Evaluation Items in the Indoor Environment Performance Field in G-SEED-Focusing on Indoor Air Quality in Residential Building" 39 (39): 217-224, 2023

    2 김경하 ; 김용현, "Study of the Improvement plans of related to Environmental Factors(E) of ESG" 27 : 55-90, 2021

    3 배채영 ; 장대희, "Proposal on the Improvement of Grading and Planting Type Scoring Standards for Biotope Area Ratio in the G-Seed" 23 (23): 107-112, 2023

    4 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-7"

    5 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-6"

    6 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-5"

    7 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-4"

    8 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-3"

    9 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-2"

    10 KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016"

    11 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Notice of G-SEED"

    12 박병용 ; 임종연 ; 김진호 ; 김소연 ; 윤요선, "Improvement of Green Standard for Energy and Environment Design Criteria With Commissioning" 35 (35): 468-478, 2023

    13 윤요선 ; 정영선 ; 서성모, "G-SEED Innovative Design Statue Analysis and Proposal for Improvement of Evaluation Method" 42 (42): 57-68, 2022

    14 CERIK, "ESG needs and challenges in the construction industry" 1 : 5-8, 2023

    15 배철학 ; 최동호, "Comparative Analysis of Certification Characteristics and Score Ratings of Multi-Unit Dwellings based on Preliminary and Main G-SEED Certifications" 14 (14): 803-816, 2020

    16 정영선 ; 윤요선, "Analysis of Evaluation Results of Energy-related Certification Items by Building Use in Green Building Certification(G-SEED)" 43 (43): 99-112, 2023

    17 윤요선 ; 장대희, "Analysis of Certification Results and Items of G-SEED Multi-Residential Buildings" 42 (42): 115-125, 2022

    18 김형도 ; 이명훈, "A Study on the Scoring Status of the Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) by Certification Item: Subject to Identification in Apartment Housing" 24 (24): 146-163, 2024

    19 최두성 ; 정용호 ; 전흥찬, "A Study on the Improvement of Green Building Certification through LCA Analysis of Office Building" 30 (30): 182-190, 2023

    20 양관섭, "A Study on the Analysis of Obtaining Grades and Improvement in the Sound Environment Performance Field in Green Building Certification" 30 (30): 659-672, 2020

    21 KICT, "2023 G-SEED Annual Report" 2023

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼