RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      비거주자,외국법인의 배당소득에 대한 과세 = Taxation of Dividend Income Derived by Non-Residents and Foreign Corporations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77040512

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper analyzes tax rules for dividend income derived by non-residents and foreign corporations, and clarifies that the OECD Model Tax Treaty, followed by most real world treaties, presupposes the classical system of economic double taxation of dividend income. After a brief introductory Part I, Part II summarizes Korean domestic law of taxing dividend income derived by non-residents and foreign corporations, focusing on the scope or meaning of dividend income and the source rule. Part III reviews tax treaties, focusing on the comparable issues in treaty interpretation. Part IV, the main subject of this paper, addresses the correlation between domestic law and tax treaties for taxing dividend income. It presents the thesis that treaty drafters may not mechanically follow the classical system-based dividend clause of the OECD Model Tax Treaty and a real world bilateral treaty must reflect the domestic law for dividend taxation. This can be well demonstrated by the past experience of EU countries that adopted languages vastly different from the OECD Model when they had imputation system or another form of relief from economic double taxation. Current European treaty practices, however, tend to return to the OECD Model in an aftermath of the ECJ decision that the imputation system is against EU law of non-discrimination to the extent it discriminatingly denies the relief to non-residents.
      번역하기

      This paper analyzes tax rules for dividend income derived by non-residents and foreign corporations, and clarifies that the OECD Model Tax Treaty, followed by most real world treaties, presupposes the classical system of economic double taxation of di...

      This paper analyzes tax rules for dividend income derived by non-residents and foreign corporations, and clarifies that the OECD Model Tax Treaty, followed by most real world treaties, presupposes the classical system of economic double taxation of dividend income. After a brief introductory Part I, Part II summarizes Korean domestic law of taxing dividend income derived by non-residents and foreign corporations, focusing on the scope or meaning of dividend income and the source rule. Part III reviews tax treaties, focusing on the comparable issues in treaty interpretation. Part IV, the main subject of this paper, addresses the correlation between domestic law and tax treaties for taxing dividend income. It presents the thesis that treaty drafters may not mechanically follow the classical system-based dividend clause of the OECD Model Tax Treaty and a real world bilateral treaty must reflect the domestic law for dividend taxation. This can be well demonstrated by the past experience of EU countries that adopted languages vastly different from the OECD Model when they had imputation system or another form of relief from economic double taxation. Current European treaty practices, however, tend to return to the OECD Model in an aftermath of the ECJ decision that the imputation system is against EU law of non-discrimination to the extent it discriminatingly denies the relief to non-residents.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이창희, "조세조약 해석방법" 한국국제조세협회 23 (23): 149-192, 2007

      2 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2009

      3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2009

      4 이창희, "전세계소득 납세의무와 조세조약상 거주자 개념" 법학연구소 49 (49): 53-70, 2008

      5 김재광, "유가증권대차거래의 과세상의 문제점" 3 : 2003

      6 이창희, "세법강의, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      7 김준석, "국제조세실무" 삼일회계법인 2007

      8 이용섭, "국제조세, 개정증보판" 2005

      9 이창희, "과소자본세제의 현황과 전망" 법학연구소 48 (48): 63-87, 2007

      10 이창희, "稅法上 屬人主義와 屬地主義의 대립" 법학연구소 50 (50): 225-264, 2009

      1 이창희, "조세조약 해석방법" 한국국제조세협회 23 (23): 149-192, 2007

      2 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2009

      3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2009

      4 이창희, "전세계소득 납세의무와 조세조약상 거주자 개념" 법학연구소 49 (49): 53-70, 2008

      5 김재광, "유가증권대차거래의 과세상의 문제점" 3 : 2003

      6 이창희, "세법강의, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      7 김준석, "국제조세실무" 삼일회계법인 2007

      8 이용섭, "국제조세, 개정증보판" 2005

      9 이창희, "과소자본세제의 현황과 전망" 법학연구소 48 (48): 63-87, 2007

      10 이창희, "稅法上 屬人主義와 屬地主義의 대립" 법학연구소 50 (50): 225-264, 2009

      11 Rufus von Thulen Rhoades, "U.S. International Taxation and Tax Treaties, v.6" loose-leaf 1996

      12 Joann Martens Weiner, "Practical Aspects of Implementing Formulary Apportionment in the Euripean Union" 8 : 629-, 2007

      13 Carlos Palao, "New Income Tax Law and Anti-Fraud Legislation in Spain" 61 : 139-, 2007

      14 United States Treasury Department, "Integration of the Individual and Corporate Tax Systems: Taxing Business Income Once" 1992

      15 Marcos Valadao, "Income Tax Treaties and the Treatment of Dividends Received by Foreign Shareholders from Domestic Corporations under an Integrated System" North Carolina International Journal of Law and Commercial Regulation, Spring 62 : 2004

      16 Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation of Congress of the United States, "General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, 100th Congress, 1st Session"

      17 Alvin C. Warren, "Federal Income Taxation Project: Integration of the Individual and Corporate Income Taxes" The Americal Law Institute 1993

      18 Klaus Vogel, "Double Taxation conventions, 3rd edition"

      19 Hugh J. Ault, "Corporate Integration, Tax Treaties and the Division of the International Tax Base" 47 : 565-, 1992

      20 John K. McNulty, "Corporate Income Tax Reform in the United States: Proposals for Integretion of the Corporate and Individual Income Taxes and International Aspects" 12 : 161-, 1994

      21 Walter Hellerstein, "Constitutional Restraints on Corporate Tax Integration" 62 : 1-, 2008

      22 International Fiscal Association, "Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International" 88A : 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼