RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    동아시아모델 논쟁의 극복: 새로운 발전론을 위하여 = Beyond Debates over the East Asian Model: Searching for New Agendas for Ease Asian Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103964929

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to overcome debates over the East Asian development model and to suggest new agendas for development of East Asia and Korea. The
    paper begins with a critical reexamination
    of a common perception of the haracteristics of East Asian development model. It argues that the old East Asian model is no longer applicable to a future development strategy of
    East Asian countries. The old East Asian model was built during the days when the “four dragons” and Japan were able to pursue neomercanti list trade and industrial
    policies. The conditions of the world system have changed. The neo-liberal trade rules urge further opening of national markets and
    the herd-behavior of financial capitals is capable of triggering a financial crisis.
    After going over theories of the Asian crisis ranging from neo-classical perspective, state-institutionalist perspective, to the world-system perspective, pointing out their
    merits and shortcomings, the paper argues the Asian crisis demonstrated that East Asian countries had failed in adjusting
    themselves to the changes in the world system. Therefore, it argues, East Asia needs to establish a new development model. Concludingly, the paper suggests
    two agendas, regional cooperation and the new East Asian model, as essential themes to explore for a new stage of development
    of East Asia and Korea.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to overcome debates over the East Asian development model and to suggest new agendas for development of East Asia and Korea. The paper begins with a critical reexamination of a common perception of the haracteristics of Ea...

    The purpose of this paper is to overcome debates over the East Asian development model and to suggest new agendas for development of East Asia and Korea. The
    paper begins with a critical reexamination
    of a common perception of the haracteristics of East Asian development model. It argues that the old East Asian model is no longer applicable to a future development strategy of
    East Asian countries. The old East Asian model was built during the days when the “four dragons” and Japan were able to pursue neomercanti list trade and industrial
    policies. The conditions of the world system have changed. The neo-liberal trade rules urge further opening of national markets and
    the herd-behavior of financial capitals is capable of triggering a financial crisis.
    After going over theories of the Asian crisis ranging from neo-classical perspective, state-institutionalist perspective, to the world-system perspective, pointing out their
    merits and shortcomings, the paper argues the Asian crisis demonstrated that East Asian countries had failed in adjusting
    themselves to the changes in the world system. Therefore, it argues, East Asia needs to establish a new development model. Concludingly, the paper suggests
    two agendas, regional cooperation and the new East Asian model, as essential themes to explore for a new stage of development
    of East Asia and Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼