RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      보청기 착용아와 인공와우 착용아의 어음 변별 특성 = A Study on Speech Discrimination Ability between the Hearing Impaired Children with Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76451696

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to compare the speech discrimination abilities between two groups such as the hearing impaired children with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Total four-to-eight years old thirty hearing impaired children, fifteen children with hearing aids and fifteen children with cochlear implants, participated for this study. The subjects are prelingually hearing impaired and have no problem without hearing loss itself. The test of speech discrimination for this study is conducted in a hearing testing room where was sound proofed and the value of inner noise was less than 30dB SPL. The tools for the test of speech discrimination are 5 sounds(/a/, /u/, /i/ , /s/) and 25 words with primary or secondary stressed syllable. The results of this study are as followings: First, in 5 sounds test, it shows that the average was 4.33 and the standard deviation was .72 for children using hearing aids. While, for children with cochlear implants, it shows that the average was 4.80 and the standard deviation was .41. It indicates that there was the significant differences statistically in the responsive sampling t-test of two groups. In the case of children using hearing aids, it indicates that error was not found in /a/ but i1: was found to only one child in /?/, two children in /u/, three children in /i/ and four children in /s/ among them, while, in the case of children with cochlear implants, it is not found in the sounds of /a/, /i/, /?/ but it founds as error with one child in /u/ and two children in /s/. Therefore, both groups all showed that the discrimination ability of /s/ is the lowest scores. Second, children using hearing aids show in discrimination words with primary or secondary stressed syllable that the average was 75.47 and the standard deviation was 13.51. However, the children with cochlear implants showed that each of them was 77.33 and 14.16. Even though the mean scores between the two groups are different, there was no significant differences statistically in the t-test. The group using hearing aids showed that the percentage of error is 26.67 % in voiceless sounds and 22.22% in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, it is 27.33% in fricatives, 27.33% in plosives, 25.67% in nasals and 17.78% in affricates. Consequently, it indicates that the percentage of error was the highest in fricatives and postives, but the lowest in affricates. White the group with cochlear implants shows that the percentage of error is 24.15% in voiceless sounds and 18.89% in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, it shows that it is 28.34% in fricatives, 26.34% in plosives, 25% in nasals, and 12.23% in affricates. The result of error analysis indicats that the percentage of errors between two groups was 0% in vowels and it was higher in voiceless sounds than in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, both groups showed that discrimination error was the highest in fricatives and plosives but it was the lowest in affricates.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to compare the speech discrimination abilities between two groups such as the hearing impaired children with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Total four-to-eight years old thirty hearing impaired children, fifteen chil...

      The purpose of this study was to compare the speech discrimination abilities between two groups such as the hearing impaired children with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Total four-to-eight years old thirty hearing impaired children, fifteen children with hearing aids and fifteen children with cochlear implants, participated for this study. The subjects are prelingually hearing impaired and have no problem without hearing loss itself. The test of speech discrimination for this study is conducted in a hearing testing room where was sound proofed and the value of inner noise was less than 30dB SPL. The tools for the test of speech discrimination are 5 sounds(/a/, /u/, /i/ , /s/) and 25 words with primary or secondary stressed syllable. The results of this study are as followings: First, in 5 sounds test, it shows that the average was 4.33 and the standard deviation was .72 for children using hearing aids. While, for children with cochlear implants, it shows that the average was 4.80 and the standard deviation was .41. It indicates that there was the significant differences statistically in the responsive sampling t-test of two groups. In the case of children using hearing aids, it indicates that error was not found in /a/ but i1: was found to only one child in /?/, two children in /u/, three children in /i/ and four children in /s/ among them, while, in the case of children with cochlear implants, it is not found in the sounds of /a/, /i/, /?/ but it founds as error with one child in /u/ and two children in /s/. Therefore, both groups all showed that the discrimination ability of /s/ is the lowest scores. Second, children using hearing aids show in discrimination words with primary or secondary stressed syllable that the average was 75.47 and the standard deviation was 13.51. However, the children with cochlear implants showed that each of them was 77.33 and 14.16. Even though the mean scores between the two groups are different, there was no significant differences statistically in the t-test. The group using hearing aids showed that the percentage of error is 26.67 % in voiceless sounds and 22.22% in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, it is 27.33% in fricatives, 27.33% in plosives, 25.67% in nasals and 17.78% in affricates. Consequently, it indicates that the percentage of error was the highest in fricatives and postives, but the lowest in affricates. White the group with cochlear implants shows that the percentage of error is 24.15% in voiceless sounds and 18.89% in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, it shows that it is 28.34% in fricatives, 26.34% in plosives, 25% in nasals, and 12.23% in affricates. The result of error analysis indicats that the percentage of errors between two groups was 0% in vowels and it was higher in voiceless sounds than in voice sounds. In a way of articulation, both groups showed that discrimination error was the highest in fricatives and plosives but it was the lowest in affricates.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      • 부록
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼