범죄피해자와 형사절차참여에 관한 고찰 = Victims and Criminal Jusitice System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Why should victims ask that the machinery of criminal justice be set into motion on their behalf? Whar do they want? Victims can pursue one, or even some combinations of three distinct goals. They first ist to see to it that criminal is punished. The second possible objective is to use the justice process as leverage to compel the offrender to undergo treatment. The third possible aim is to try to get court to order the wrongdoer to make restitution.
This study examined the realtion with justification of punishment versus criminal victims.
It is punishment that comes to most people's minds first. Most of the deliberations of criminal justice officials concern questions of punishment. Punishment is usually justified on utilitarian grounds as a necessary evil. It is argued nthat punishing wrongdoers curbs furure criminality in a number of ways. The offender who experiences unpleasant consequences learns a lesson and is discouraged from breaking the law again (specific deterrence). Making an example of a convicted criminal also serves as a warning to would-be offenders contemplating the same act (general deterrence).
According to theory of punishment as retribution, it is fair and just to make offenders suffer in proportion to the suffering they inflicted on others. Some victims do not look to the criminal justice system to exact revenge in their name. Instead, they want professionals and experts to help offenders become decent, law-abiding citizens. Some victims seek restitution rather than retribution or rehabilitation.
Wherther they desire that something be done to the offender (punishment), for the offender (treatment), or for themselves (restitution), victims want the criminal justice system to react effectively to violations of law.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 머리말
• 2. 피해자와 형벌의 목적
• 3. 공판절차와 피해자참여
• 4. 결어
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고" 한국피해자학회 14 (14): 5-22, 2006

2 심희기, "형사정책과 사법개혁에 대한 조사·연구 및 평가(I)-[3] 사법개혁에 대한 평가와 전망" 형사정책연구원 2007

3 황지태, "형사정책과 사법개혁에 대한 조사·연구 및 평가(I)-[2] 사법개혁의 방향과 중요 쟁점에 대한 전문가 의식 조사" 형사정책연구원 2007

4 배종대, "형사정책 (제7전정판)" 홍문사 2008

5 도중진, "형사절차에서 범죄피해자에 대한 재고찰" 한국피해자학회 10 (10): 173-209, 2002

6 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률해설" 법원행정처 2007

7 오영근, "형사사법체계상 회복적 사법의 실천방안" 한국형사정책연구원 2006

8 류전철, "형법해석학적 관점에서 응보론의 재조명" 한국비교형사법학회 5 (5): 2001

9 신동운, "형법총론 (제3판)" 법문사 2008

10 이용식, "형벌론과 형사실체법에서 피해자의 역할" 한국피해자학회 15 (15): 93-110, 2007

11 장규원, "피해자학입문" 길안사 1999

12 김용세, "피해자학의 발전과 피해자보호의 최신 동향" 한국피해자학회 10 (10): 137-172, 2002

13 이윤호, "피해자학" 박영사 2007

14 윤동호, "피해자의 의사와 형사절차" 한국피해자학회 14 (14): 117-146, 2006

15 이재상, "신형사소송법 (제2판)" 박영사 2008

16 강경래, "수복적 사법이란" 한국피해자학회 13 (13): 65-75, 2005

17 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술술권에 관한 연구" 한국피해자학회 14 (14): 2006

18 천진호, "범죄피해자의 권리 확보방안" 한국피해자학회 15 (15): 5-36, 2007

19 김완진, "공리주의·개혁주의·자유주의" 서울대학교출판부 1996

20 서병훈, "공리주의" 책세상 2007

21 宮澤浩一, "犯罪被害者と刑事司法" 成文堂 1995

22 松村良之, "刑罰の社會心理學と犯罪被害者" 日本被害者學會 14 : 2004

23 齊藤誠二, "刑罰の正當性の根據をめぐって”, 宮澤浩一先生古稀祝賀論文集 第2卷 -刑法理論の現代的展開" 成文堂 2000

24 小木曾綾, "刑事手續の犯罪被害者" 日本被害者學會 14 : 2004

25 Schunemann, B, "Zur Stellung des Opfers im System der Strafrechtspflege" NStZ 1986

26 Hart,H.L.A, "The Concept of Law" Oxford 1961

27 Johnstone,G, "Restorative Justice" Willan Publishing 2002

28 Pollock,J, "Ethics in Crime and Justice, 3rd ed" Wadsworth 1998

29 Karmen,A.., "Crime Victims, 3rd ed" Wadsworth 1996