RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국의 보호법(CARES Act)상 긴급재난지원금 등 법제 검토 = Review of laws such as emergency disaster support fund under the US CARES Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107135400

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The government has prepared and paid emergency disaster support funds to the people to overcome the coronavirus crisis. Emergency disaster subsidies have been implemented in the United States faster than other countries and followed by the Korean government and other countries. In the case of the United States, the laws of emergency disaster subsidies have been established and enforced to help citizens get through the coronavirus. In the United States, the CARES Act was enacted by Congress, which regulates various types of remedies to protect people in the pandemic.
    The CARES Act stipulates that the government should operate various relief systems such as emergency disaster assistance, loan and its repayment delays for small business owners, citizen health care programs, and student loan repayment delays for those who received it under the Higher Education Act.
    All of these assistances are provided by federal finances. The expenditures by the government should be clearly stated in the law to be consistent with the rule of law.
    The rule of law purposes to protect the fundamental rights of the people by definitely stipulating important matters related to people’s basic rights in the law. That is why the rule of law is so called practical law, not formal one.
    Therefore, emergency disaster subsidies are citizens’ taxes, which are provided by the public's financial resources, so distinctly stipulating them in the law is consistent with the rule of law. In Korea, meanwhile, the emergency disaster support funds are paid through the resolution of the National Assembly since the korean legislation does not have any regulations regarding the emergency disaster support funds. It is necessary that the emergency disaster subsidies should be executed by voluntary decision of the government and plus they should be evidently regulated in the law for the protection of people’s basic rights by preventing budget wast.
    This study reviewed the US CARES Act to examine the legislative improvement of emergency disaster assistance funds. The analysis of the emergency disaster fund that the US regulates in the law could help improve the future korean legislation.
    번역하기

    The government has prepared and paid emergency disaster support funds to the people to overcome the coronavirus crisis. Emergency disaster subsidies have been implemented in the United States faster than other countries and followed by the Korean gove...

    The government has prepared and paid emergency disaster support funds to the people to overcome the coronavirus crisis. Emergency disaster subsidies have been implemented in the United States faster than other countries and followed by the Korean government and other countries. In the case of the United States, the laws of emergency disaster subsidies have been established and enforced to help citizens get through the coronavirus. In the United States, the CARES Act was enacted by Congress, which regulates various types of remedies to protect people in the pandemic.
    The CARES Act stipulates that the government should operate various relief systems such as emergency disaster assistance, loan and its repayment delays for small business owners, citizen health care programs, and student loan repayment delays for those who received it under the Higher Education Act.
    All of these assistances are provided by federal finances. The expenditures by the government should be clearly stated in the law to be consistent with the rule of law.
    The rule of law purposes to protect the fundamental rights of the people by definitely stipulating important matters related to people’s basic rights in the law. That is why the rule of law is so called practical law, not formal one.
    Therefore, emergency disaster subsidies are citizens’ taxes, which are provided by the public's financial resources, so distinctly stipulating them in the law is consistent with the rule of law. In Korea, meanwhile, the emergency disaster support funds are paid through the resolution of the National Assembly since the korean legislation does not have any regulations regarding the emergency disaster support funds. It is necessary that the emergency disaster subsidies should be executed by voluntary decision of the government and plus they should be evidently regulated in the law for the protection of people’s basic rights by preventing budget wast.
    This study reviewed the US CARES Act to examine the legislative improvement of emergency disaster assistance funds. The analysis of the emergency disaster fund that the US regulates in the law could help improve the future korean legislation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "헌재2002.12.18.2002헌마52결정"

    2 "헌재1997.7.16. 96헌바36내지49(병합)결정"

    3 "헌재1992.12.24. 92헌가8결정"

    4 "헌재1990.4.2.89헌가113결정"

    5 김철용, "행정법" 고시계사 2020

    6 김원중, "한국과 일본의 재난지원금 법제 개선 방안" 유럽헌법학회 (33) : 329-354, 2020

    7 국회예산정책처, "코로나19대응 긴급재난지원금 관련 사례 분석" (17) : 2020

    8 "https://www.긴급재난지원금.kr/main.jsp"

    9 "https://www.gov.kr"

    10 "https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/text"

    1 "헌재2002.12.18.2002헌마52결정"

    2 "헌재1997.7.16. 96헌바36내지49(병합)결정"

    3 "헌재1992.12.24. 92헌가8결정"

    4 "헌재1990.4.2.89헌가113결정"

    5 김철용, "행정법" 고시계사 2020

    6 김원중, "한국과 일본의 재난지원금 법제 개선 방안" 유럽헌법학회 (33) : 329-354, 2020

    7 국회예산정책처, "코로나19대응 긴급재난지원금 관련 사례 분석" (17) : 2020

    8 "https://www.긴급재난지원금.kr/main.jsp"

    9 "https://www.gov.kr"

    10 "https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/text"

    11 "https://uscode.house.gov"

    12 "https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares"

    13 "https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp"

    14 "https://covidmask.net"

    15 "http://www.moef.go.kr"

    16 "http://www.law.go.kr"

    17 "http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/international/japan/944946.html"

    18 "http://www.bokjiro.go.kr"

    19 "http://news.seoul.go.kr/welfare/archives/517950"

    20 "http://news.kotra.or.kr"

    21 "http://mediahub.seoul.go.kr"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼